Ask HN: What is your go-to backup system for Linux servers?

1 points by dom9301k ↗ HN
Except the evergreen rsync

6 comments

[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 30.4 ms ] thread
I have been using duplicity so far and it does the job
duplicity also. it's the default on most distros, and it's way better than pure rsync.
Currently I would recommend Restic <https://restic.net/>, which I use it both for personal and professional backups. It can have some rough edges, but all-in-all it's the "best" (as in a good balance between ease of use, complexity and sustainability) for my own use-case.

In the past I've used `rdiff-backup` due to the lack of a better suited (to my use-case) alternative.

Please note the emphasis on "my use-case"! Thus, a good backup solution must make sense for your own context. Choosing the most "popular" solution might not be a good option if it's too complex (or expensive) for you to use, or the worst case scenario to recover data from.

Perhaps start small: even a copy (i.e. `rsync`) of your data on an external hard-drive is good enough than nothing at all, or if using OSX then try TimeMachine first. Then gradually move to better suited solutions.

Another vote here for restic along with hot rsyncs as needed to a TrueNas
Kopia is nice (kopia.io)
ZFS send to a TrueNAS server if you can have it, otherwise Restic to anywhere.