Hmm. I've changed it above - but given how confidently the original title says Mithradites and how carefully edited The Believer presumably is (was?), it's not obvious what's going there. Perhaps reading the entire article would clarify but I am le tired.
7 comments
[ 0.27 ms ] story [ 28.6 ms ] threadhttps://archive.ph/YLTmY
Would a "mithradite" be a cultist or a fossil?
Edit: no, you're right - https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Mithridates+of+Fond+du+La...
It's another one of those spelling mistakes: like rouge/rogue, pharoah/ pharaoh, racontuer/ raconteur etc.