3 comments

[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 26.8 ms ] thread
yep, and if reasonably sufficient, a noscript/basic (x)html should be there too.
Definitely! I'm encouraged by the growing number of zero-JS-shipped-by-default frameworks out there. Really nice to see that course-correction within the industry.
Well, I am not hostile to those frameworks providing javascript pretty-fied portals, until they provide working and tested noscript/basic (x)html portals, if it can do a good enough job, ofc (and zillions of services can reasonably be provided over the net using basic (x)html forms).

Usually, it is actually those frameworks which are hostile to noscript/basic (x)html browsers.

The main concern about noscript/basic (x)html portals are the bigtech corpo(=state?) sponsored hackers paid to attack them, because alternatives to google (blink/geeko) or apple (webkit) must not be pertinent.