Supreme Court: 4th Amendment void within 100 miles of coast (latimes.com) 6 points by electic 4y ago ↗ HN
[–] legitster 4y ago ↗ This title is wrong.Federal agents can still be charged criminally with violating constitutional rights. This ruling is about seeking damages in a civil court separately. [–] legitster 4y ago ↗ Remember when the Supreme Court (supposedly) gave away half of Oklahoma last year?News coverage of rulings is almost universally awful, so take simplified headlines with a grain of salt. [–] cato_the_elder 4y ago ↗ Right, and the ACLU has been pushing that distorted narrative for quite a while: https://www.techdirt.com/2013/02/12/do-you-live-constitution... [–] [deleted] 4y ago ↗ (comment deleted)
[–] legitster 4y ago ↗ Remember when the Supreme Court (supposedly) gave away half of Oklahoma last year?News coverage of rulings is almost universally awful, so take simplified headlines with a grain of salt.
[–] cato_the_elder 4y ago ↗ Right, and the ACLU has been pushing that distorted narrative for quite a while: https://www.techdirt.com/2013/02/12/do-you-live-constitution... [–] [deleted] 4y ago ↗ (comment deleted)
5 comments
[ 3.7 ms ] story [ 24.5 ms ] threadFederal agents can still be charged criminally with violating constitutional rights. This ruling is about seeking damages in a civil court separately.
News coverage of rulings is almost universally awful, so take simplified headlines with a grain of salt.