59 comments

[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 116 ms ] thread
I am so jealous. Not only that he test drove this but that he can afford it.
I hold a lot of respect for Elon Musk. He's making a lot of great contributions with the work he's doing, and it's exciting to see someone addressing some serious issues.
If one of my startups is ever successful this will be one of my very few "I'm rich bitches" purchases.
I'm not sure about the point of having a car I'd drive only 10 days in a year.

Why not creating a company that leases Tesla cars? and the company would also have a racing circuit nearby. Now, that would be fun.

I'll drive the Tesla every day, as I do with my Lotus. Why drive a boring car to work?

-W

Let's also give Wil tons of credit. No VC it seems and a great piece of software with delicious monster.
I'm surprised he can even afford a Lotus Elise. But do you think he was able to afford those cars by Delicious MOnster alone? Or were they a purchase from his earnings at Omni?
a lotus elise isn't that expensive a car; brand new they're only about $45-50k. my lotus exige was only $57k new.

though the tesla roadster, while initially based on the lotus elise chassis and body, is about double the price of an elise. i'd be more surprised if he was actually able to find one for sale since i thought all 2008 models were spoken for. though i don't think his article actually said he was buying one, just that he took one out on an autocross course.

Well, he did say:

"The Tesla I drove was an engineering prototype but is said to be very close to the one I'll get next year."

So I guess he's getting a 2009 model or something.

The 2008's are being delivered in 2009 because Tesla is so far behind schedule.
He's done quite well. Delicious Library has sold ridiculously well, and Wil still owns a large portion of Omni, I believe.
I'll stick with my gallardo and continental gt. nothing compares to listening to a v10/12 rip the road apart! although admittedly, I do miss a stick shift.
Tesla is incredibly awesome. First electric-car-project that I believe in. Deisgn is awesome. I have never even been interested in cars but I really want a Tesla.
I guess it's Elon Musk Day today. Good news from his two most ambitious projects.
My brother used to race his Porsche, so after reading the article I found myself wondering "How long til people start trying to circuit race these things"

Anyone care to put an estimation on a time frame? I'm thinking somewhere around 2010-2012.

I think someone putting some serious effort in trying to set up a series would help in a greater adoption of the electric car.

The whole quiet thing creeps me out about the Tesla. Its a sports car you are supposed to hear the engine roar. + the whole quiet thing greatly increases your chances of some soccer mom side swiping you
So I assume smug geeks are immune against bad driving?
when a guy crashes its because he is in the process of doing something stupid. When a woman crashes its because she isn't paying attention.

Women are just horrible drivers from my experience. I've been hit 5 times and members of my family were hit 3 times. In ALL but one cases the other person was a woman. And that doesn't count the hundreds of times I had to scramble to get out of the way because some woman suddenly decided that she liked my lane better

1-side swipe w/o her using any turn signals. Usually not a problem since I'm used to this, but this one was dodging rear ending another car

2-sitting at a red light and the woman thought the light turned green, caused about 4 grand in damage(she must have had the pedal to the metal)

3-entering driveway and the woman thought my turn signal was flashing the other way, so she decided to pass on a shoulder and t-boned me as I was entering

4-t-bone in a parking lot because the woman decided to look back at her kids and hit gas instead of brakes

5-rear end at a red light because the woman thought I'd run the red light and didn't

6/7-2 major hits at a parking lot because the woman didn't slow down enough entering the space

the one time I got hit by a guy it was when we were both pushing the limit at the racetrack, and was due to him understeering.

Until I modified my car's exhaust I had to avoid careless women almost daily. Now that they can actually hear me thats been cut down to once a week. An aftermarket exhaust is the best investment you can make to avoid major repairs to your car.

I don't drive, but when I'm out cycling -- and I do a lot of cycling (something like 900km this summer) -- I behave like a car on the roads. I've never been hit myself, but I've had many close calls:

1) About two months back I saw a girl on a bike get hit by a guy who "didn't see her" because, as he claims, he was watching me (I was about 10m back). He was on a minor street crossing a major street. We were on the major street, and she got hit side-on. She was fine, by the way, just scrapes on her legs and hands (a doctor happened to be nearby, and he checked her over).

2) I almost got sideswiped by a guy turning right off a minor highway. Had to pull on the brakes and swerve left into the lane to avoid him. Thankfully there were no cars there.

3) As I was stopping at a stoplight, a pickup truck pulled up behind me. The guy inside apparently didn't like how far from the curb I was. He stuck his head out the window, swearing about how he's going to run me over. I yell back, tell him to mind his own business, then make a quick right turn to avoid him.

I could go on. In fact, of all the times I've gotten a look at the driver, it was a woman driver very few times. To use a word I saw here recently, my anecdata contradicts your anecdata.

I can't tell you how many times a large truck accelerated up behind me with the horn blaring and guys yeehawing in a not so pleasant manner interrupting a nice, quite bike ride in the countryside. Sometimes they throw can's or cigarettes.

Never had this happen with a truck full of females.

Glad to hear I'm not the only person who's had that happen to them. But with me, it happens in the city (I don't do much biking in the country).

In fact, it happened this afternoon, since I wrote my last post. Strange, eh?

See, this is one of those cases where an anecdote does not render fact.

If women actually did cause more accidents; hence they are worse drivers, they wouldn't be paying less for insurance than us males now would they?

Males drive more miles than females.

...Yet another reason to charge insurance by the mile and/or minute.

  .
By the way, this is interesting (though I don't know how accurate it is):

http://christianparty.net/womendrivers.htm

Women Drivers: Hidden Health Risk To Men

Women drive only 30% of miles driven but are in 37% of the fatal accidents ...

NHTSA data suggests that ... if only women drove:

There would be 23,879 more traffic fatalities each year.

There would be 7,674 more women killed each year.

Thats because most of their accidents are less severe. A guy's accident usually happens when they go beyond their limit and they end up totalling their cars. For women most of their accidents are due to carelessness and usually happen at a much lower speed. All of the accidents I had, were done at less than 10 mph.

+ I think the whole insurance industry is lagging, it'll probably be another decade before they adjust women's rates.

I mean right now the whole thing is unfair as hell when it comes to insurance. When I was in college, a girl I knew had 8 at fault accidents. She totaled 3 cars and the rest were fender benders. Her insurance paid out close to $150,000. And her insurance was STILL lower for full coverage for a new 330ci than what I paid for liability on my old Civic. And I had a clean record, no at fault accidents or points on my license. Not exactly fair.

Don't you just plug in the audio and a big speaker system? You could choose the engine to imitate and make any noise you want. (sure I've read that in an article somewhere, though can't find the link!)
As a car nut that has spent time on a race track (exhibit a: http://flickr.com/photos/pauls/sets/72157594286920410/ ) in various sports cars, I see a strong dichotomy between Tesla owners/gawkers and real car guys. Yeah the Tesla accelerates faster than most people will have ever experienced before and it's neat with its whole 1 gear thing, instant torque and of course being all electric. But it will be the laughing stock of any track day.

First off, as Wil pointed out, it doesn't like staying at 100mph+ for very long. That naturally makes it not a track friendly car. It will get passed up easily on the straightaways at some tracks (ex you can hit 140+ on the back straight at Road Atlanta). And the brakes will get roasted and it will run out of battery after just a few sessions. Not to mention that there's no fun in driving a car and not shifting gears and toying with the clutch, and of course being deafened by the loud sound of a free flowing V-8,10,12,whathaveyou

Okay, just my little rant. In summary the Tesla is not a car guy's car, it's a SV show-off car.

you don't have to be a track guy to be a car guy. some people genuinely enjoy cars that are terrible track performers.
Yeah ... it's neat with its whole 1 gear thing, instant torque

...The same as a Corvette ZR1 (and also the same price) in third gear.

http://www.digitalcorvettes.com/forums/showthread.php?t=9212...

2009 ZR1 . Max rpm 6500 . Tire Dia 26.4 . Tire Circumference 6.9115' . Rear End 3.42

  Gear  Ratios  Max speed(mph)
   1     2.29        65.2
   2     1.61        92.7
   3     1.21       123.4
   4     1.00       149.3
   5     0.81       184.3
   6     0.67       222.8
I could have given a massive list of examples of cars faster than the Tesla but figured "most people" covered me there. I was at NAIAS 2008 during press week and watched Jeff Gordon unveil the ZR1 at GM Style. pics elsewhere on my flickr account.
I was referring to the Tesla's wide torqueband -- "its whole 1 gear thing". It is not an exclusive feature. A ZR1 can also be driven in 1 gear only and still achieve both 0-60 in 4 seconds and a top speed over 100 mph.
I agree that it's not going to hang with a lot of normal gasoline cars, but considering how far electric cars have come in such a short time (momentarily exclude the fact that there were electric cars in the early 1900s that were an evolutionary dead end), I think that may change before too long.

Also, I believe that monkeying with a manual clutch is a misfeature (witness twin clutch type sequential manuals) and that loud engines are also just a matter of opinion, or only so popular because of the fast cars they represent, not the other way around. I think if/when electric cars are the fastest thing around there will be a lot of car guys who want nothing to do with the current side-effect of performance.

(Also, big ups for track time. I haven't worked up the courage to get out there with mine yet.)

"No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame." --- Just because it doesn't have the features you expect - doesn't mean it's not a killer product.

It's the first car they've ever built! Do you honestly think there will never be an electric track ready car? Surely this a pretty damn impressive first step.

As has been noted by others - the clutch is a misfeature - it's fun (I only drive manuals) - but I don't see it as being essential for the Tesla.

And as for the noise - agree but also disagree - a big engine sounds awesome - but honestly - the important thing about a car is how it drives - not how it sounds.. It's going to take a few years for that to happen - but it will.

I love my 335i coupe, but I think I would trade it for a Tesla in a heartbeat. I am so excited that a company is embracing alternative fuels (electricity especially) in aims of making a supercar.

Gear shifting slows down a vehicle, regardless of how fast it is, since you're disconnecting the engine from the powertrain. It also is another thing you have to bother with while driving.

"It also is another thing you have to bother with while driving."

I think that's what makes driving fun.. you have greater control of your cars actions and are in touch with it. I could never see myself driving something where I never have to touch the shifter once its in a forward gear.

As for the speed issue, you're right, it is slowing it down. (granted new paddle systems make that 60 milliseconds like the F430 Scuderia) But the Tesla only has 1 gear, which doesn't like going much past 100mph.

the Tesla only has 1 gear, which doesn't like going much past 100mph.

It is a 2-speed car. Tesla is planning on performing a recall to upgrade the transmissions of all of the delivered 1-speed cars to 2-speed.

http://www.teslamotors.com/media/press_room.php?id=803

No, they originally delivered 2-speed cars that were locked in 2nd gear -- and now they're replacing that gearbox with a one-speed gearbox that's a lot stronger.

They increased the power of the engine while waiting to fix the gearbox, and found the car now accelerates fine with only one gear.

-W

Thanks for clearing that up for me, Wil. (And welcome to HN, though I am new here, also.)

Do I understand correctly that the 1.5 drivetrain tends to get hot at high speeds and is automatically throttled to prevent overheating (thermal throttled, like some CPU's) and that that is the reason that though the car can indeed reach 120 or more MPH, it cannot sustain it for very long?

I agree wholeheartedly. There's nothing like the thrill of attacking some twisties and pushing it to the limit.

Nobody here is Michael Schumacher, but a manual car with a good sound will damn sure make you feel like him.

"It also is another thing you have to bother with while driving."

It still surprises me how few manuals you see in the US, It's as if people aren't interested in driving + getting the most out of the car. If you don't enjoy driving, why not get a driver. If you enjoy driving, you want a manual.

Nothing worse than speeding up an on-ramp, and the car refusing to budge out of 2nd.

Curiously enough, many Americans see cars as transportation.

They don't get drivers for the same reason they don't have chefs and other personal assistants.

In about twelve seconds from a standing start, my 350Z will get me to "lose your license" speeds. Even if I had an automatic transmission, I would still never be able to get the "most" out of the car without taking it to the track. Anyway, I agree that manual transmissions are outdated and sequential shift should be standard equipment on sports cars. Motorcycles have had clutchless shifting forever, why not cars?

OTOH, I live out in the country and about 5 miles of my commute is on winding gravel roads. Turn off Traction Control and I have a blast without ever exceeding the speed limit!

Motorcycles have had clutchless shifting forever

There is a motorcycle model with clutchless shifting?

Guess it depends on your definition of "motorcycle" but my Honda Foreman 400 (a 4-wheeler) and so do many others.
Oh, I highly enjoy driving, I just don't enjoy having another pedal to mash and fiddling around with a stick while in traffic. I live in Los Angeles. You ride the 405 freeway during rush hour in a manual.

Regardless, I still wouldn't buy a manual. I drive my brother's old turbo Z and my dad's manual pickup sometimes. I've driven a friend's manual Porsche Cayman S on the tracks too. Clutches just aren't fun.

An added bonus is the speed of SMG transmissions today. My 335i's "steptronic" transmission has a clutch-lock for that real direct connection to the engine feel, plus it shifts in 100ms; which I don't think any human could actually do. The perfect throttle blipping makes it extremely smooth. Further, the fun of using paddle shifters is a huge thrill as a FIA F1 fan! :D

I love my 1991 Golf "coupe", but I think I would trade it for a Tesla in a heartbeat. I am so excited that a...
I don't love my 1999 Ford Windstar. When will Tesla come out with a minivan?
How is the recharging done by the way? Do you need a recharging-station at home? How long does it take? I couldn't find that info on the homepage.
It will plug into a standard wall socket, but if you can plug into a 220v socket (like a washing machine) it will charge in half the time.
Cool, how long is that time?
I think it was around 8 hours for an empty to full charge on 220v.
Does the battery need to be completely empty before recharging?
That black roadster is a black swan. 1) We've been duped into thinking the technology was not practical, 2) The only reason it's not massively disruptive is its price, and 3) Years from now new drivers will find what we have to do to maintain our current rolling crap completely ridiculous.