[–] jerf 14y ago ↗ Please review the guidelines: http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.htmlThis is in violation of a lot of them, as are several of your other submissions. [–] CMartucci 14y ago ↗ Would you be so kind as to tell me which rule you think I'm violating? [–] stfu 14y ago ↗ How about "Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon."A Republican constructing some argument based on a God-reference is not that much of a new phenomenon. [–] CMartucci 14y ago ↗ Yeah, that's not what that rule says. My post is not a story about politics, it's an opinion. I'm not breaking the story, or the rules.Don't vote it up if you don't like it.
[–] CMartucci 14y ago ↗ Would you be so kind as to tell me which rule you think I'm violating? [–] stfu 14y ago ↗ How about "Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon."A Republican constructing some argument based on a God-reference is not that much of a new phenomenon. [–] CMartucci 14y ago ↗ Yeah, that's not what that rule says. My post is not a story about politics, it's an opinion. I'm not breaking the story, or the rules.Don't vote it up if you don't like it.
[–] stfu 14y ago ↗ How about "Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon."A Republican constructing some argument based on a God-reference is not that much of a new phenomenon. [–] CMartucci 14y ago ↗ Yeah, that's not what that rule says. My post is not a story about politics, it's an opinion. I'm not breaking the story, or the rules.Don't vote it up if you don't like it.
[–] CMartucci 14y ago ↗ Yeah, that's not what that rule says. My post is not a story about politics, it's an opinion. I'm not breaking the story, or the rules.Don't vote it up if you don't like it.
4 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 19.9 ms ] threadThis is in violation of a lot of them, as are several of your other submissions.
A Republican constructing some argument based on a God-reference is not that much of a new phenomenon.
Don't vote it up if you don't like it.