[–] r721 4y ago ↗ I like the "hallucination" theory (called "Transcranial magnetic stimulation" in wiki article):>Magnetically Induced Hallucinations Explain Ball Lightning, Say Physicists>Powerful magnetic fields can induce hallucinations in the lab, so why not in the real world, too?https://www.technologyreview.com/2010/05/11/203417/magnetica...(2010) [–] trasz 4y ago ↗ Doesn’t explain occurrences with multiple witnesses though? [–] r721 4y ago ↗ Yeah, it doesn't explain all observations (when there is objective physical damage too). Just an original one, which I wouldn't come up with on my own when first reading about ball lightnings in 90s.
[–] trasz 4y ago ↗ Doesn’t explain occurrences with multiple witnesses though? [–] r721 4y ago ↗ Yeah, it doesn't explain all observations (when there is objective physical damage too). Just an original one, which I wouldn't come up with on my own when first reading about ball lightnings in 90s.
[–] r721 4y ago ↗ Yeah, it doesn't explain all observations (when there is objective physical damage too). Just an original one, which I wouldn't come up with on my own when first reading about ball lightnings in 90s.
3 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 15.8 ms ] thread>Magnetically Induced Hallucinations Explain Ball Lightning, Say Physicists
>Powerful magnetic fields can induce hallucinations in the lab, so why not in the real world, too?
https://www.technologyreview.com/2010/05/11/203417/magnetica...
(2010)