NB original title is "LOSE 10.6 POUNDS in FOUR WEEKS with this ONE WEIRD TRICK Discovered by Local Slime Hive Mind! Doctors GRUDGINGLY RESPECT Them, Hope to Become Friends", but I felt that was a bit linkbaity for HN.
I typically hew to the "existing title" rule but I find it often obscures the whole point of the article to the HN viewer. Someone who already reads that blog would probably find the title perfectly reasonable and funny.
Holy shit this thing badly needs both an editor and a tl;dr.
Also, losing 10 lbs in a month is nothing to write home about as most diets will have you shed water weight, up to 8 lbs in less than a week. Reducing carbs or salt are the two easiest way of doing so. Something most experienced/serial dieters would know, but makes for excellent clickbait.
> Reducing carbs or salt are the two easiest way of doing so.
This diet specifically did the opposite of this "advice". Potatoes are pretty high up on the complex carbs list and one of the takeaways in the article was a finding that some people needed to increase salt consumption in this diet. Their figures also showed a linear relationship in weight loss over time that seems, at least with four weeks of data, to much more sustainable than many other diets and suggests what was lost wasn't just "water weight".
In general a lot of the article is about how much this diet is about ignoring usual experienced/serial dieter "advice".
This article was definitely clickbait to get a lot of people asking these questions about what about this diet makes it "remarkable", especially because it ignores so much "experienced" dieter advice. The working theory is that it may lower a person's lipostat, but that's just a working theory and the article acknowledges it will be a few months of follow ups to best evaluate that working theory.
An article can be both clickbait and thoughtful discussion.
> one of the takeaways in the article was a finding that some people needed to increase salt consumption in this diet
They need to increase salt because they were losing salt thus water, it's what happens when you cut all processed food. Even the added salt is still much lower than what you'd ingest in a normal SAD diet.
On a ketogenic diet (which is more extreme that this, but to prove my point) the best solution not to feel crap the first few weeks is putting a little salt in your water. Whenever you feel a little weak, have a little salt. Works fantastically, then about a month in your body learns to retain the smaller amount of sodium better, so you don't pee as much nor need to supplement any salt.
> Holy shit this thing badly needs both an editor and a tl;dr.
I noticed the size of my scrollbar and thought to myself "oh this will be the typical dieting blog post that is 10% blog post and 90% comment section with every Dick and Harry writing about their own personal experience".
I like how they focused on the boredom factor of the participants. Not surprised with the weight loss results though, potatoes are mostly water and carbs
16 comments
[ 2.1 ms ] story [ 21.5 ms ] threadI typically hew to the "existing title" rule but I find it often obscures the whole point of the article to the HN viewer. Someone who already reads that blog would probably find the title perfectly reasonable and funny.
Also, losing 10 lbs in a month is nothing to write home about as most diets will have you shed water weight, up to 8 lbs in less than a week. Reducing carbs or salt are the two easiest way of doing so. Something most experienced/serial dieters would know, but makes for excellent clickbait.
This diet specifically did the opposite of this "advice". Potatoes are pretty high up on the complex carbs list and one of the takeaways in the article was a finding that some people needed to increase salt consumption in this diet. Their figures also showed a linear relationship in weight loss over time that seems, at least with four weeks of data, to much more sustainable than many other diets and suggests what was lost wasn't just "water weight".
In general a lot of the article is about how much this diet is about ignoring usual experienced/serial dieter "advice".
This article was definitely clickbait to get a lot of people asking these questions about what about this diet makes it "remarkable", especially because it ignores so much "experienced" dieter advice. The working theory is that it may lower a person's lipostat, but that's just a working theory and the article acknowledges it will be a few months of follow ups to best evaluate that working theory.
An article can be both clickbait and thoughtful discussion.
Potatoes are absurdly good at this.
You basically can’t over eat boiled / baked potatoes.
https://optimisingnutrition.com/calculating-satiety/amp/
I tried this with sweet potatoes once. Best I ever felt. Super boring.
They need to increase salt because they were losing salt thus water, it's what happens when you cut all processed food. Even the added salt is still much lower than what you'd ingest in a normal SAD diet.
On a ketogenic diet (which is more extreme that this, but to prove my point) the best solution not to feel crap the first few weeks is putting a little salt in your water. Whenever you feel a little weak, have a little salt. Works fantastically, then about a month in your body learns to retain the smaller amount of sodium better, so you don't pee as much nor need to supplement any salt.
I noticed the size of my scrollbar and thought to myself "oh this will be the typical dieting blog post that is 10% blog post and 90% comment section with every Dick and Harry writing about their own personal experience".
Nope, it's all blog post. Sheesh!
I think the author does a good job addressing this in the section "Actually Why Not Just Look at All The Data".
To me, visually, the slope of weight lost does not flatten out significantly either after 7 days or 10 lbs.
https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/health/diet-nutrition/news/...
He wrote a book about it. Color me skeptical.