I have been unable to gain access to my Twitter account for months. It says I need to upload my photo identification to prove I own it, but the upload form fails with a 500 error message and no information. Emails to twitter support (in response to the thread requesting I upload it) with the photo attached go unanswered. It's pretty insane.
Is this some public bug ticket system? Or is it some “Mommy said no, so ask Daddy” kind of thing. People are too self-important these days…
The logical conclusion of this is to eventually have some biometric data that ties you to something a little more secure than an email. I’m not sure tweeting about academic absurdities would warrant me allowing a corporation access to my fingerprint, but different strokes.
When companies don't respond through their deliberately underfunded channels, people reach out through other channels. There's nothing wrong reaching out, nor "too self-important" with doing so. Every time it happens, you should blame the company and not the person looking for help.
This is victim blaming. It's obvious who's the hacker and who's the rightful owner, but there's a Kafkaesque process blocking resolution of the issue, and apparently no access to any humans with authority to override the automated systems.
Same here. And the worst is that they made much much more than what they will ever be fined. We can see the same with Uber and other brigand "tech" companies.
That really annoyed me to so I refused, complained, and they allowed me to login again with just my Twitter Id and password. A bit of a pain, but I was pleasantly surprised.
I was confused because the username has been flipped back to @AcademicsSay, @Adidas_Web3 no longer takes you to the account. You're right that the tweets are still up though.
There’s a trade off between preventing social engineering and giving people access to their lost account. And then add the issue that people don’t want to link online account to their real identity, so verification is hard.
I don’t really know how Twitter could have done better.
17 comments
[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 50.2 ms ] threadThe logical conclusion of this is to eventually have some biometric data that ties you to something a little more secure than an email. I’m not sure tweeting about academic absurdities would warrant me allowing a corporation access to my fingerprint, but different strokes.
Sometimes it works, if you're well known enough.
Anybody check out the contract yet to see what it steals? since its a free mint
Turns out I was right about why they wanted it:
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/05/...
I don’t really know how Twitter could have done better.