Yes the title should be "Could machine learning fuel yet another reproducibility crisis in science?"
There's a bit of denial about the framing of the article, which is maybe telling.
The article is about a slightly different form of reproducibility crisis I think, one more specific to ML studies. But the title maybe isn't quite right.
3 comments
[ 3.7 ms ] story [ 18.4 ms ] threadThere's a bit of denial about the framing of the article, which is maybe telling.
The article is about a slightly different form of reproducibility crisis I think, one more specific to ML studies. But the title maybe isn't quite right.