[–] chaostheory 3y ago ↗ Does this mean that Jay Forester’s simulation is still correct?Edit thank you for proving me wrong and showing that this article was a sham.
[–] cstoner 3y ago ↗ This article has been widely discredited. The author of the paper says they are misrepresenting the research.I'm on mobile or I'd track down more links, but it was pretty easy for me to find several articles about how this is bad science reporting. [–] beloch 3y ago ↗ What research? They link to their "citizen science" website. Their website links to itself and a pre-print article that is unlikely to even pass cursory inspection by a journal referee. This is blog garbage.Flagged.
[–] beloch 3y ago ↗ What research? They link to their "citizen science" website. Their website links to itself and a pre-print article that is unlikely to even pass cursory inspection by a journal referee. This is blog garbage.Flagged.
3 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 17.3 ms ] threadEdit thank you for proving me wrong and showing that this article was a sham.
I'm on mobile or I'd track down more links, but it was pretty easy for me to find several articles about how this is bad science reporting.
Flagged.