Some people may like it though (to adequate limit).
Anyway, isn’t a headline already a good summary? Tbh, 50%+ of my comments go into threads which I never tapped the link of, or at least I check comments first. Partly because a discussion is more interesting than an article and the latter can be seen simply as a pretext for chatting about something relevant (often not).
Edit: Also some users, either author or someone else, may write a summary as a comment and/or warn about lengthy post style. Seen it, done it.
When I realize I have fallen into one of these articles I usually write a TL;DR, not something the authors might like but it makes me feel better by converting my time wasted into good for others
2 comments
[ 0.24 ms ] story [ 11.4 ms ] threadAnyway, isn’t a headline already a good summary? Tbh, 50%+ of my comments go into threads which I never tapped the link of, or at least I check comments first. Partly because a discussion is more interesting than an article and the latter can be seen simply as a pretext for chatting about something relevant (often not).
Edit: Also some users, either author or someone else, may write a summary as a comment and/or warn about lengthy post style. Seen it, done it.