40 comments

[ 3.5 ms ] story [ 88.0 ms ] thread
aka "with sufficiently clever software you can turn innocent and charming children's drawings into nightmare fuel!"
Except the photo-manipulation suite, they are not done by software.
Interesting, so software plus sufficiently clever user of it. :)
It's a good thing he got his fifteen minutes of fame before an AI was created to do exactly the same thing.
I actually thought this was an AI
Mad Magazine did this in 1963... "If kids designed their own Xmas toys": https://imgur.com/gallery/45RGR
Thank you! I know Maddox did a similar gag in the early 2000's, but I always think of the Mad version.
I got a lot more than what I expected
The pictures look the like were generated by ML
Yes, equally disturbing.
Some sort of uncanny valley poes law of pictures.
I wish Dall-e was more like this.
This is fun and cool. Also, I kind of expect that DALL-E (or, a variation thereof) will be able to do this with the right prompts. Hope he doesn't get too attached to the manual process and keeps the project going when the AI comes for his jerb ;)
How can I take my kid’s drawings and do the same?
Considering all the Dall-e stuff it's a bit ironic that the sites font shows the artist name "Al" almost the exact same way as it would the acronym "AI".
I was very confused by that. I only realized that Al is one of the two children when I saw his picture further down on the about page. Before that, I assumed it was an awkward attempt of claiming to have an AI “in the family”.
OT: Please don't use hover interactions for displaying titles on mobile phones. I thought this was a gallery and then realised I had to tap and check what these are.
Also see the absolutely absurd episode of Dexter's Laboratory "Dexter and Computress Get Mandark!" It was written and narrated by a six year old fan of the show and hilariously brought to life by Genndy Tartakovsky and crew.
Unpopular opinion, but here goes ... The pictures are absolutely charming. This is because they distill the essential qualities of the object (from the child's POV), which is lost when you have perfect representation art. But turning them into real objects results in things that are often terrifying and grotesque, not charming. I don't believe the kids wanted their object to look like that in real life. They may be proud that their creation is realized, but I doubt their drawing is an expression of desire. They just have imperfect skills in representation. In contrast, there is imaginative art that kids excel at (e.g. a puppy with wings and a goatee). That's something that is really cool to see as a real object.
That whale/seal was very disturbing