Could they though? If Firefox started having giant ad images on the new tab page, sending ad notifications and pushing crypto scams, the users would be outraged.
Is this a new usage of the word "debounce"? When I was in college, debounce is what we did to eliminate repeated inputs from clicky buttons connected directly to the GPIO pins on a microcontroller.
Here it just sounds like they misspelled "redirect".
What if the developers made the informed choice to use AMP? Aren't they going to be hug-of-deathing a lot of sites that thought they had a caching scheme?
11 comments
[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 11.7 ms ] threadI don't think BAT is a scam, but Brave hasn't done the best with it. Regardless, Mozilla previously pushed for crypto [2]
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30665493
[2] https://mobile.twitter.com/mozilla/status/147695103063826022...
https://www.androidheadlines.com/2022/02/mozilla-partners-wi...
[1] https://www.techtimes.com/articles/271832/20220214/mozilla-m...
But that leads to [2]
[2] https://www.prweek.com/article/1740679/mozilla-meta-collabor...
And that "privacy-preserving attribution" thing is all over the googles.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendan_Eich#Appointment_to_CE...
Here it just sounds like they misspelled "redirect".
Words can -- and often do -- have multiple meanings.