Ask HN: Hobbies/Skills which can be picked in 30s and compete at world level?

22 points by aryamaan ↗ HN
What are some skills/hobbies you could start in your 30s and there are not many disadvantages to compete at world/regional level?

Many physical things become difficult.

Most of the other things statistically work out when you start as a kid.

What are some sports, creative activities which don't have to be your full time thing but still you could spend years to understand and excel it?

Running comes to the mind, what would be other examples?

79 comments

[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 143 ms ] thread
Bouldering - On lower levels, bouldering is easy, and you can make progress using only physical strength until you reach a plateau that requires you to learn technique. At some levels, you don't even need much strength to begin. Competing is possible with enough practice and fine-tuning of your technique after a couple of years.

In addition, you meet new people by discussing solutions to problems (routes on the wall), which is a major benefit for people in their 30s.

0 Chance of competing at a world level if you start climbing/bouldering in your 30s (unless you're already an athlete of some kind). The training and competition in climbing is insane now compared to when I started in the early 90s.

I guess the more niche the sport, the better and it would be better if you already have a background in something similar. E.g. good surfers turn to hyrdofoiling, kite surfing, SUP, kayaking etc.

> I guess the more niche the sport

Maybe highlining?

The more niche the sport and the easier recovery requirements the better.

I had a colleague many jobs ago who’d made a bet with a friend that they could qualify for the Olympics. Didn’t specify what sport, or for what country, just that they’d qualify.

He then went and did a bunch of research into what sports are most (and of course least) competitive, landing on fencing as the best candidate. He also took advantage of being eligible for Irish citizenship, where the pool of potential competitors is smaller. I don’t know if he ever made it to the Olympics, but he was definitely heading in that direction.

World-class fencers peak in their 30's; they don't start then. (they probably started ~10)
Bruce Dickinson (Iron Maiden singer) famously was a top level fencer as well as a commercial pilot and numerous other things, now a throat cancer survivor and still a top level singer in his mid 60s. I saw him 30 years ago and again this year and I think he was better this year!

My friend represented Uganda in the World Freestyle Kayaking Championships this year. He's English but has lived there for some time and as long as you've never represented your own country you can do this according to ICF rules.

I'd question the likelyhood of a person being able to compete at a world level if they start in their 30s. However, they might experience almost lifelong improvement rather than peaking in their 30s and be able to climb a wide range of grades but I don't expect to see them competing in Innsbruck.
> picked up in 30s and compete at world level

I don't think there's a single person who has competed in the bouldering world cup or olympics over 30, let alone who _started_ over 30.

Every boulderer at a world level started in their teens at least.

I welcome you to provide me a single counter example of someone who has qualified (not even won, just qualified) for a bouldering world cup who started climbing at 30.

Perhaps not possible at a world level, but it's at least possible at a regional level (Depending on where you live).
Pumpkin-growing competition. Competitive dog agility racing. Perler bead art. Woodworking. Professional merkin construction. The list of possibilities is longer than the list of impossibilities.
Video and music production, game development, stock trading, book writing. You've got every prerequisit by the time you hit 30, you can do anything at a global level.
Amateur radio (in particular "Contesting").
I second this. Amateur radio is an amazing hobby where you learn lots about electronics, (virtually and - if you like- physically) meet lots on new people and gain lots of knowledge on our planet, its countries and their people. You can participate in contests and compete with others many times a year and all this from home - if you are lucky enough to be able to put up antennas.

I amazes me evertime over and over again to have a conversation with someone living 10000km away from me without having to rely on other peoples/companies infrastructure. Especially when you are able to power your station with solar energy.

I've picked up this hobby with 40 and the only thing I regret is not having it picked up earlier. Also a great hobby for parents since you can operate from home at night times when everybody else is asleep.

Interesting. You may have inspired me to give it a go.

So where the hell do I start? Any recommendations for a beginner?

I'm in the UK if it makes a difference.

I myself did not know any amateur radio operator but read about it on the internet. I then did some research on what is needed to get on air - which is a license. Without a license, you can buy gear and listen to the airwaves (but are not allowed to press the PTT button) or listen to shortwave communications via WebSDR. Some people visit local amateur radio clubs, learn stuff there and get help. I went the following route:

* I decided that I want to get the beginner license first, then do a second exam for the big license

* bought some books for exam preparation

* bought a cheap 30€ handheld radio to listen to local repeater traffic while studying

* downloaded an exam preparation training tool

* worked through the material halfway through

* have registered for an exam

* stood up every morning at 5 and learned 2h before the family woke up for two months

* did the exam, got the beginner license

* studied another two months

* got the big license

* met other amateur radio operators a year after that ;)

Here are some links:

* this is the site of your country's club: https://rsgb.org/main/clubs/club-finder/

* the amateur radio subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/amateurradio/

There is so much more to write and I don't know where to start, but here are some fun facts:

* you don't have to learn morse code anymore for the license in most countries

* for local communicaiton, a budget of 30-100€ is sufficient

* for world wide shortwave communication, a budget of 400 to 700 can be sufficient when buying used

* you can do digi modes (computer to computer communication) instead of talking to people. This helped me the first year to get into it since i was mic shy.

* the community is awesome, people share their knowledge and help each other

* you can buy a digital handheld radio for around 200€ and work the world without any antennas over the internet. For some not the real thing, for others a blast.

Start your hobby at http://www.arrl.org/. The American Radio Relay League, if you are in North America. Every other country will also have a National Amateur Radio Association. Except north korea…
The way radio contesting requires you to collaborate with your competitors is fascinating to me. Both stations my struggle to pull their competitor out of the noise because you both get points or a new multiple for doing so. Then there is no out of band way to verify logs, they just have to line up with what's in your competitor's logs.

And if you dig around the rules there are _lots_ of awards. e.g. I was the highest scoring QRP station in the Illinois QSO Party a few years ago.

If you haven’t done it by the time you’re 30, you can apparently become a world-class archwizard.
And if you do it eight times afterwards, your son can become a sourcerer.
Woodworking. Where competing means making the most beautiful (for whatever style you want).
I picked up wood working in my late 40's when I was on a soul crushing IT project, and could no longer code recreationally in the evening. Wood working uses a different part of my brain and feels very cathartic. I don't think I'm "world class", but I'm decent and continue to improve.
30 is pretty old
Now listen here young thing, show some respect for your elders!
I'm 30, at this age life is simply mehhhhhhh.
At that age I decided to quit my tech job and live in China for an intensive language program. That opened my eyes to so many other things.

I'm currently working on learning Korean. Also working on my private pilot license. And then there is my constant work towards a sub 3 hour marathon (I'm almost there). Dabbling with music production too.

My 20s were mostly boring, but my 30s are awesome - adventurously and intellectually so. (I'm 36)

Sure, I'll never be world class at anything, but I will constantly challenge myself. That is enough for me.

My 30s were great. People stopped expecting me to grow up¹ and begrudgingly accepted that this is how things are going to be!

----

[1] Or grow up again… I grew up too much in late teens / very early 20s and have been working my way down since.

Mountain biking, depending on where you live.
I second this. My friend picked it up in his late 40s and is competing at the regional level.
One might think that chess would qualify. People become grandmasters in their 20s, with less than 20 years total experience, so surely if you quit your job and focus on only chess from 30 to 50, you can gain enough skill and experience to compete at the world level...

And yet, in practice, almost all chess grandmasters have started young. I don't know of any grandmaster who started playing chess seriously past 30 (and chess.com didn't have any concrete examples that I saw: https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/gmsims-who-started-...)

Physical sports are obviously out, as the world level is dominated by people under 30 for all of them.

I'll also comment further on two things you wrote in your original question:

1. "compete at world level" and 2. "don't have to be your full time thing"

In practice, the majority of things that have world competitions will also have people who will devote themselves, body and soul, to it, so if you are intent at not spending all your time on this, not making it your passion, then you should not reasonably expect to "compete at world level".

I think you might do better by classifying "compete at world level" as being very broad, like considering writing a "new york times best seller" to be competing at writing at the world level (in which case, yes, some authors started after 30). If you broaden it to simply "be able to have fun", I think you'll have a far better time of it, and at that point almost any physical activity now becomes something you can start past 30.

I think you're right. It feels like if the problem is phrased as an activity you can become world class in while doing part time without having started before your thirties, you're pretty much restricted to things that are more subjective in their measurements. Arts and crafts have been mentioned. Otherwise the alternative is something of a niche character that there arent really any full time practitioners and the pool of practitioners is fairly small. Maybe something like air rifle shooting or drone racing?
> if you quit your job and focus on only chess from 30 to 50

To add to this, I think most people don't understand how incredibly exhausting, mentally (in the sense of mental strain) and physically, high level chess is. A 40 year old chess player may have enough knowledge and skill to compete, but not enough mental and physical stamina to do so.

(comment deleted)
Paragliding. Physically not too difficult. It is more a mental game - chess in the sky.
Somebody also suggested paramotoring in another comment, which is less like chess against the sky, but may be more accessible depending on where you live.

However they also warned, and this applies just as much for paragliding, that competiting in this sport is significantly more dangerous than practicing as a hobby.

A lot of art is like that. Or pick one of tabletop games - kind of warhammer or something like that. Less popular video games have the same property too.
(comment deleted)
Compete wouldn't be the right word but there have been people starting art later in life that are world class.

Bjj tournaments have age brackets. Check the IBJJF worlds masters. If you win your bracket you do technically get the titles of world champ.

“fight like an old man, you will be one some day”

BJJ also has a culture of action and community. OP, look for that. Where are people +30 getting together)

Yoyo / kendama

Although I'm of the opinion they're more fun as an activity than to do competitively.. but for many that's the fun part.

Paramotoring. Bear in mind that elite-level competition is considerably more dangerous than paramotoring as a leisure activity.
Famous art collectors tend to be old (and rich).
Writing is one of the skills that you get better at later in life, because of accumulated experiences broadening the range of situations and interactions your characters are placed into.
Architecture, boat building.
Programming and Painting
I don't think you can become competitive programmer if you haven't started at young age and went to good math schools and won a few local competitions/olympiads. Learning this at 30 will get you only so far
A lot of sports have competitions for "masters" only which is typically 40+ years old

So you could learn to sail in your 30s, spend 10 years getting good (need plenty of time on the water and coaching) and then enter the masters.

Sailing is a sport where you need lots of time on the water, coaching and some luck.

But a lot of people drop out of it in the 20s and 30s due to families and work.

So over the pandemic, I (in my mid 40's) went through ViBE's B2GM videos [1], and spending a couple of hours a week over six months or so managed to get up to Platinum 3 on the Starcraft 2 ladder; which, if I'm reading the stats right, means that (at that point) I would have been able to beat 50% of the people playing SC2 on the ladder. And there was still a lot of low-hanging fruit for me to deliberately practice when I moved on to some other projects in my precious free time.

Now, you're not going to compete in SC2 with people who practice 10-20 hours a week unless you also practice 10-20 hours a week; but you can certainly get pretty good and have a lot of fun. (Maybe neurological limitations from being older would prevent you from being top-tier even if you did practice 10-20 hours a week; but I'm inclined to believe it's more that older people are less likely to practice 10-20 hours a week for whatever reason.)

[1] https://youtu.be/mfFas8p5g7M

It becomes exponentially harder to climb the ladder. To be "world level" or "top tier" in SC2 it most definitely has to be your main thing and you need to dedicate a significant amount of time to it.

Would not advise OP to pick SC2.

Sure, but is there anything in the world to which that doesn't apply? If OP wants to be "world-tier", he's going to have to put in time commensurate with other "world-tier" people, no matter what he's doing.