2 comments

[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 17.6 ms ] thread
This is the latest of a rapidly growing list of shitty behaviour from Substack.

They seem about as trustworthy as Meta at this point.

The coda at the end makes a great point:

> Finally, I do not think Substack is uniquely shitty. Substack has demonstrated that they are instead typically shitty.

Bad organizational behavior toward reporters and editors is too often the norm across the journalism/media industry, even though it's detrimental to the quality of the actual news products that they are all presumably trying to sell.