Ask HN: Why is Apple Music lightyears behind Spotify from a technical POV?
I used Spotify briefly on an iPhone 13 Pro and I immediately felt how responsive everything was. Loading playlists, playing a track, searching, loading other types of content. It's shocking how good Spotify's streaming tech is. Then I went back to Apple Music again and I immediately felt how slow and unoptimised everything was in comparison.
From a technical perspective, how is Spotify, which has a 100 times smaller market cap, able to completely demolish Apple in streaming technology?
7 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 29.3 ms ] threadApple: Bring iTunes to the cloud Spotify: Start with the cloud and bring Music on
I still like the way Apple "views" Music, I like browsing Artists etc. on Apple Music, but I love you responsive Spotify is.
Anecdote: I've been a paying Spotify premium subscriber for the past 10 years. I finally switched to Apple Music recently. Why? My favorite song, from my favorite artist (well known, national U.S. artist) is inexplicably unavailable on Spotify - but available on Apple Music.
So maybe Apple is light years behind technically because they see it as a partnerships game as opposed to a technical game.
The portfolio available on Spotify (and any other streaming service) is so huge, even if one major artist is missing, you’re still pretty much guaranteed to find something you enjoy.
This is purely anecdotal, but looking at me and many of my peers: many people don’t even have a favorite artist anymore. At least no artist they care enough about to switch streaming platforms for.
As someone with a background in QA, I can only assume they do all their testing under "ideal conditions" so they do not notice the (sometimes frustrating) lag time for end-users.