> the actor Jerry Carroll, often mistaken for the mysterious Eddie, would rattle off a sales pitch ending with the vibrating, bug-eyed assurance: “His prices are INSANE!”
I always assumed that individual was Eddie himself.
Is this what the multidimensional cable advertising guy with ants in his eyes in Rick and Morty was satirising? I always felt I was missing a cultural reference.
Yes-ish. That part was improvised, and Justin Roiland is from California so is unlikely to have seen the actual commercials. They were widely parodied and imitated though, so the segment likely was inspired be Crazy Eddie.
> And when there was no more room under the radiator, he started bringing the money to Antar’s father’s house, where he hid as much as $3.5m — ~$11m today — in a false ceiling.
Wouldn’t that make it a true ceiling?
(Technically, they would be hiding the money above a false ceiling.)
I sincerely thought there might be something here related to The Mote in God's Eye [0], a pretty good book by Niven and Pournelle about far off future alien contact.
I was dead wrong, but I'll still take the time to link it for the heck of the coincident names.
I thought exactly the same thing before I remembered the article from a few month previous.
Mentions of that book still makes me laugh because my local library had purchased two copies of the sequel. "The Gripping Hand" was also released as "The Moat around Murcheson's Eye" in the UK. The library purchased one of each not realising they were the same book.
And I still wonder 30 years later about why there were two names and which one was the authors' first choice.
I'm currently reading The Gripping Hand years after having first read The Moat in God's Eye. There's further exposition on the concept of "Crazy Eddie." Nothing to do with computer-business Crazy Eddie. The Motie Crazy Eddie is an apocryphal figure who embodies the misguided notion all problems have solutions.
Some quotes, from the 2nd book:
"We will call him Crazy Eddie, if you like. He is a ... he is like me, sometimes, and he a Brown, an idiot savant tinker, sometimes. Always he does the wrong things for excellent reasons. He does the same things over and over, and they always bring disaster, and he never learns."
...
"So why did you say that Crazy Eddie is supposed to fail? Don't the Moties admire Crazy Eddie? (...)" "(...) But yes, I think they all admire anyone mad enough to think that all problems have solutions. Which doesn't mean that they expect the universe to cooperate."
I like the concept of Motie "Crazy Eddie" because it's fun to in turn imagine if humans ever had the need and opportunity to explain our concept of "Murphy's Law" to aliens who have a different default outlook. It's interesting to compare and contrast the two. They're similar in that they both express a tongue-in-cheek pessimism, but the Motie parable is a defeatist justification of not trying. The human version is defeatist acceptance of the suffering that comes from trying. Crazy Eddie is someone else to watch and learn what not to do. Murphy is you, and you never learn. From the perspective of the Moties, all humans are Crazy Eddie.
Edit: another compare/and contrast is Motie Crazy Eddie causes his problems due to his own choices being self-defeating attempts at solutions to problems. An example given is melting down all of your stock of screws to cast a screwdriver. In contrast Murphy's problems are caused by events (at least partially) outside his control, with the implication that all choices lead to (the potential of) ruin.
I clicked the comments to make a comment about The Mote in God's Eye, probably some cryptic comment about old crazy eddy and his starship drive that just made him vanish forever.
25 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 59.3 ms ] thread> the actor Jerry Carroll, often mistaken for the mysterious Eddie, would rattle off a sales pitch ending with the vibrating, bug-eyed assurance: “His prices are INSANE!”
I always assumed that individual was Eddie himself.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJ9yBgTp9UQ
https://futurama.fandom.com/wiki/Malfunctioning_Eddie
Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30829593
Wouldn’t that make it a true ceiling?
(Technically, they would be hiding the money above a false ceiling.)
https://whitecollarfraud.blogspot.com/
https://whitecollarfraud.blogspot.com/p/blog-post-index.html
I was dead wrong, but I'll still take the time to link it for the heck of the coincident names.
0 - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mote_in_God's_Eye#Crazy_...
Mentions of that book still makes me laugh because my local library had purchased two copies of the sequel. "The Gripping Hand" was also released as "The Moat around Murcheson's Eye" in the UK. The library purchased one of each not realising they were the same book.
And I still wonder 30 years later about why there were two names and which one was the authors' first choice.
Famous one being the Philosopher’s Stone.
Some quotes, from the 2nd book:
"We will call him Crazy Eddie, if you like. He is a ... he is like me, sometimes, and he a Brown, an idiot savant tinker, sometimes. Always he does the wrong things for excellent reasons. He does the same things over and over, and they always bring disaster, and he never learns."
...
"So why did you say that Crazy Eddie is supposed to fail? Don't the Moties admire Crazy Eddie? (...)" "(...) But yes, I think they all admire anyone mad enough to think that all problems have solutions. Which doesn't mean that they expect the universe to cooperate."
I like the concept of Motie "Crazy Eddie" because it's fun to in turn imagine if humans ever had the need and opportunity to explain our concept of "Murphy's Law" to aliens who have a different default outlook. It's interesting to compare and contrast the two. They're similar in that they both express a tongue-in-cheek pessimism, but the Motie parable is a defeatist justification of not trying. The human version is defeatist acceptance of the suffering that comes from trying. Crazy Eddie is someone else to watch and learn what not to do. Murphy is you, and you never learn. From the perspective of the Moties, all humans are Crazy Eddie.
Edit: another compare/and contrast is Motie Crazy Eddie causes his problems due to his own choices being self-defeating attempts at solutions to problems. An example given is melting down all of your stock of screws to cast a screwdriver. In contrast Murphy's problems are caused by events (at least partially) outside his control, with the implication that all choices lead to (the potential of) ruin.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oghd8vgfAL8
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxFq5_zjY4Q
[3] idky yt poster split this short scene into two shorter yt posts ><