6 comments

[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 31.5 ms ] thread
A spectral signature of the light emitted from the object might help to decide if an object is “man-made”. Military aircraft should be carrying hyperspectral sensors, I believe.
The "Nimitz" incidents all happened in the most highly instrumented naval test range in the world.

And all we got were fuzzy pics.

Clickbait.

Congress does NOT admit UFOs are aliens or any such nonsense. What they say is clear. Once a UFO can be positively determined to be a manmade object it no longer a UFO and would be passed off to other appropriate agencies to investigate.

Temporary nonattributed objects, or those that are positively identified as man-made after analysis, will be passed to appropriate offices and should not be considered under the definition as unidentified aerospace-undersea phenomena

The article might as well claim that a ring and dash where you can't find the 10 year old kid who did it as being an proof that bigfoot exists.

Well, actually I wouldn't say it's clickbait. They are saying that 'unidentified aerospace-undersea phenomena' is not man-made.
How do they know if said thingamajig is unidentified ?
>There ain't no difference between a flying saucer and a time machine

Maybe Miller from the movie Repo Man was right after all ...