> Nvidia CFO Colette Kress insisted that the company is "unable to accurately quantify the extent to which reduced crypto mining contributed to the decline in gaming demand," notably because Nvidia has gotten into trouble with the SEC for obscuring the number of GPUs it was selling to cryptocurrency miners in the past.
This sentence is confusing. Is "because" the right word here? If Nvidia got into trouble for obscuring the number of GPUs used in mining, wouldn't that motivate the company to get a handle on this number as part of its obligation to disclose risks to shareholders? Especially because Ethereum is about to render most mining rigs useless with the upcoming "merge"?
Nvidia apparently got into a contract to produce a huge amount of 40-series GPUs and couldn't back out of it after the mining crash. Pretty sure we'll have plenty of them.
Sorry I'm not buying into this. Unless you can show me where I can buy an RTX 3070 for $350 cause that's how much I paid for my GTX 1070 7 months after the release (and that was brand new not second hand market)
hear hear, my desktop died a few months back and I keep waiting for exactly this to build a new one. it always seems like it's going to be right around the corner but still, no such luck…
If you're short a graphics card, why do you need to build an entirely new desktop? Unless there was a fire, flood or catastrophic PSU failure that took out everything, in which case, Rust In Pieces (and also insurance or warranty?)
an ancient power cord that I've had since the first desktop I built—which I loved because it had a female connector on the back of the male connector, so you could plug a tower and monitor into the same outlet—finally bit the dust, the ground snapped off and I'm assuming the whole thing is fried. I'm using my fiancée's laptop in the interim but I was overdue for a whole new PC anyway—the GTX 980 TI wasn't quite cutting it anymore anyway
yeah I have many spares, but this seems to have killed at least my PSU, possibly also my motherboard, and I'm not really in the mood to trial-and-error what's broken and what isn't lol
In my experience of being the neighborhood computer fix it guy, there's a really good chance that your motherboard is fine and the PSU is all that's dead. PSU's have a lot of protection circuitry in them.
> To deal with this, according to Huang, Nvidia will reduce the number of GPUs it sells to manufacturers of graphics cards and laptops so that those manufacturers can clear out their existing inventory.
So what happens to the abundance of cards? They have to sell them sometime, don't they? Will they sell those to integrators and other B2B partners as a tactic to keep the supply for gamers restricted in an effort to keep the high MSRPs?
In 2017 it was practical to get an entry-mid (GTX 1060, RX 480) level GPU for <$200 USD. Now the MSRPs for similar cards are a solid 50% more and the gains from each generation haven't been that significant.
I think the long term strategy is to price GPUs so ridiculously that services like GeForce Now for $200 per year start to look like a good deal. If Intel ARC wasn't around I'm convinced we'd see reductions in supply, increases in prices, and a bigger push for game streaming.
It wouldn't even surprise me to see AMD and Intel get into game streaming deals and for the whole industry to trend in that direction.
26 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 67.1 ms ] threadThis sentence is confusing. Is "because" the right word here? If Nvidia got into trouble for obscuring the number of GPUs used in mining, wouldn't that motivate the company to get a handle on this number as part of its obligation to disclose risks to shareholders? Especially because Ethereum is about to render most mining rigs useless with the upcoming "merge"?
if you really want them: https://old.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/wqyu5b/com...
https://www.amazon.com/3090Ti/dp/B09R9G57GK --> 1149
So what happens to the abundance of cards? They have to sell them sometime, don't they? Will they sell those to integrators and other B2B partners as a tactic to keep the supply for gamers restricted in an effort to keep the high MSRPs?
In 2017 it was practical to get an entry-mid (GTX 1060, RX 480) level GPU for <$200 USD. Now the MSRPs for similar cards are a solid 50% more and the gains from each generation haven't been that significant.
I think the long term strategy is to price GPUs so ridiculously that services like GeForce Now for $200 per year start to look like a good deal. If Intel ARC wasn't around I'm convinced we'd see reductions in supply, increases in prices, and a bigger push for game streaming.
It wouldn't even surprise me to see AMD and Intel get into game streaming deals and for the whole industry to trend in that direction.