It doesn't render well on Firefox 2 on Kubuntu (FWIW). The white text in the header is offset and is hard to read. And there is a big gap between that top image and buttons below it.
Design looks great in general. I clicked on Xbox360. Suggestions:
1. Don't show an item in the results if there are no sellers. Or at least say "None available" on the results page.
2. For items that have multiple sellers, indicate the price range (rather than just the lowest price) as well as # of sellers. Similar to how the Amazon.com marketplace does it.
General Q: how will you compete against entrenched players like Amazon.com and Half.com? There's a couple of benefits on your about page (shipping included in price, ability to filter by seller rating + price), but just those probably won't be enough.
I'm not the OP, but this would be competitive with Amazon.com if they go the individual seller angle. It's a fair amount of work to become a 3rd party seller on Amazon, which excludes all but dedicated businesses.
I think the concept is sound, if only as a meas to replace eBay, which as of late has been stagnant, unsafe for users, and just a pain to use.
We have access to inventory that no one else does through our partnerships with in-store point of sale partners. Dawdle is the first marketplace, in any vertical, to let retailers list their items online with one click from within their existing POS systems.
Also, our ability to let buyers create StandingOffers - "I know what I want and what I'm willing to pay" - is the first time any marketplace, in any vertical, has allowed buyers to initiate transactions. We're really proud of this technology - there's no back and forth. If a listing comes in that matches your criteria, you buy it automagically.
Excellent stuff! I'll be pointing my friends to this site from here on out.
My few notes:
1) I concur with the others, excellent design that is clean and intuitive to navigate.
2) Your seller rating stars in the left column on pages have a grey BG and for cleanliness these need to be on white. I understand you used the same pics from the standard ratings section which is on grey
3) There're two glitches with the top search bar where on some pages it is too long and overlaps the search button (FF3 on Mac). Also on FF3 on Mac if someone activates the thickbox, the grey overlay is under the search bar so it remains white and thus looks odd.
4) Kudos for not diving in head first to the gaming sphere. Most people would add forums and news sources and such and when you're starting out all that does is clutter the site and require more work on your part.
Overall I think it's a sound concept, and the site is very well done. The question becomes how the money is made? Is it per transaction? Ads?
We process all the payments and take a 11.99% commission for our services. That's less than eBay's 15% plus 5 cents listings for 30 day fixed price and less than Amazon's 15% plus $0.99 for Marketplace listings.
Great design, easily one of the best I've seen on a 'rate my startup' here. Browsing is also easy to use and simple to understand. I filtered down to PC games > less than $10 and got no results, but figured out within a few seconds how to remove the 'less than $10' filter (before I resorted to just clicking 'back'). Great stuff.
XMLReader::open(http://feeds.feedburner.com/DawdleBlog) [<a href='function.XMLReader-open'>function.XMLReader-open</a>]: failed to open stream: Connection timed out
Very mature product, I was impressed. Some of the things I noticed:
1) This many sound stupid, but I couldn't for the life of me figure out what the logo was (is it a button?). That's probably just me though.
2) I agree with zhyder that it would be best if you don't show games that have no sellers. The whole offering a price to a seller was a little weird for me.
3) You have an impressive amount of games on the site, and the homepage banner (the guy holding the wiimotes) is very good. Anyone just dropping by gets the feeling that the site is very active, and that's great.
4) How does the 100% guarantee affect the company's bottom line? As a potential buyer I think "Great!" but as an entrepreneur I think "uh oh." How does that work out?
Again, excellent site. My brother's a huge gamer, and I'll tell him to check it out the next time he's looking to buy the next title.
Couldn't enter a standing offer for a game. Tried before I created an account and after. Both times, it would only do anything when I clicked "no" on the offer box.
Other than that... It was fairly easy to figure out and use (until the problem above. ;-).
The website is most probably designed in Mac and the designer forgot that Lucida Sans and Lucida Grande do not exist in Windows by default. Although the Arial and Verdana are also declared in the CSS, however for some weird buggy reason, Windows fails to perfectly render the text in either Arial or Verdana, or any other sans-serif font. That's why it looks like sh*t.
In my Linux, the text seems okay and perfect although my computer lacks any Lucida typefaces.
My only gripe is that the narrow down box doesn't contain a "By Platform" selection. You have to start at the platform of choice then select the genre to get results for Genre X for Platform Y.
Not a huge deal, but I had clicked "By Genre: Role-Playing" link on the home page and couldn't narrow down to platform.
You had me at "moronically something for gamers" :)
As others said - a viable idea and it is already very well executed. One major functional issue I see is this:
# Having games and systems and accessories all mixed up is confusing. I would divorce these into separate parts of the website. At the very least I would ensure that games and systems/accessories won't show up on any list (i.e. For Sale) together, at least by default.
Few comments on the appearance and visual design:
# Logo needs to be redone. Right now it's completely unmemorable and bland looking. In fact replacing it with just a word "Dawdle" would improve the appearance of the page. Tag line needs to be removed from the logo too. I'd aim at something simple and similar to GameTap and Valve's Steam logos.
# Front page feels "busy". The "For Gamers, By Gamers" insert is a high-contrast item with too much text. It's largely useless, no one is going to read it. I'd go with a more saturated background color and remove the text.
# Font in the top menu looks funny. One pixel size too small.
# Shaded buttons on the same page are nice. But they are inconsistent with the top menu - I'd style the menu the same way the buttons are.
Lastly, a feature suggestion if I may (I haven't registered an account, so perhaps you already have it). Consider the fact that most gamers are kids/teens and have very little money of their own. It would make sense to allow their parents to fill their dawdle accounts with "buying credits". This is not easy to implement by any means, but it may prove to be a great way to facilitate buying part of the business.
Thanks - we have to use the TM because we intend on protecting the mark. It's a key technical differentiation that we offer that Amazon and eBay don't.
Great design, but Fonts look awful in windows. The text is unreadable. You are probably using a Mac, but I should remind you that most gamers use PCs. So you should make sure the site looks good in Windows.
The white text on the main image is a little rough to read, especially the last word "gaming". Also, the blue to the left of it being so bright makes the white text there a little hard to read as well. I'm on my laptop which isn't properly adjusted, so it might look better elsewhere, but I'd be willing to be most users aren't properly adjusted either.
OK, we did a brute force change of making everything Arial while we work out the "Lucida on Mac/Arial on else" stuff. Maybe we'll keep Lucida out forever, who knows?
Very nice design...for all the others that love the design and can't quite place their finger on why, visit apple.com. Same font, layout, and a very similar color scheme. (I'm not ripping on dawdle...apple's design deserves to be emulated.)
One quick thing is I would change the tagline to "Buy Games. Sell Games." The reason is that the eye isn't really drawn to "Buy & Sell Video Games, Systems, and Accessories with other Gamers Online."
I don't like the middle panel either. The text doesn't say anything meaningful, and the buttons don't really add anything. I would change the buttons to something like "Games", "Consoles", and "Accessories".
remember, when marketing to morons, you have to make sure not to let the morons know you know they are morons, or you have to distract them with shiny stuff so they quickly forget the insult. :)
the main splash image looks like a broadway dancer holding onto suspenders or something. It took me longer to figure out the point of the site because of this.
"Buy Now" takes me to a big page full of text rather than to stuff I can buy! And when I scroll down (without reading anything of course) I see a price of $19.99 which I assume is a subscription price so I leave your site never to return...
I'll bet that's how it's going for quite a few of your potential customers.
Here's a bug: I'm looking at Xbox 360 games and I click on "under $10" and the criteria to remove in the box on the top left says "under $25".
I clicked on Bargain Bin on the home page and couldn't find out how to restrict the listing to Xbox 360 games. The links I found removed the bargain bin restriction. When I clicked in Xbox 360, I immediately got a listing which started off with the systems, which I am definitely not interested in. A landing page with recent releases and recent top sellers would be more appropriate, especially if it made it easier to separate the systems and games.
I assume your business is a game-specific price comparison portal. It's not a bad idea, but you may need more content before you provide value over game store sites (ebworld.com) or game review sites (gamespot.com). Along those lines, why would I log in? There doesn't seem to be any community content that would require me to identify myself.
70 comments
[ 6.4 ms ] story [ 165 ms ] thread1. Don't show an item in the results if there are no sellers. Or at least say "None available" on the results page.
2. For items that have multiple sellers, indicate the price range (rather than just the lowest price) as well as # of sellers. Similar to how the Amazon.com marketplace does it.
General Q: how will you compete against entrenched players like Amazon.com and Half.com? There's a couple of benefits on your about page (shipping included in price, ability to filter by seller rating + price), but just those probably won't be enough.
I think the concept is sound, if only as a meas to replace eBay, which as of late has been stagnant, unsafe for users, and just a pain to use.
Also, our ability to let buyers create StandingOffers - "I know what I want and what I'm willing to pay" - is the first time any marketplace, in any vertical, has allowed buyers to initiate transactions. We're really proud of this technology - there's no back and forth. If a listing comes in that matches your criteria, you buy it automagically.
My few notes:
1) I concur with the others, excellent design that is clean and intuitive to navigate.
2) Your seller rating stars in the left column on pages have a grey BG and for cleanliness these need to be on white. I understand you used the same pics from the standard ratings section which is on grey
3) There're two glitches with the top search bar where on some pages it is too long and overlaps the search button (FF3 on Mac). Also on FF3 on Mac if someone activates the thickbox, the grey overlay is under the search bar so it remains white and thus looks odd.
4) Kudos for not diving in head first to the gaming sphere. Most people would add forums and news sources and such and when you're starting out all that does is clutter the site and require more work on your part.
Overall I think it's a sound concept, and the site is very well done. The question becomes how the money is made? Is it per transaction? Ads?
if(isset($assoc[0]['val'][1]['val'][4]['val'][0]['val'][0]['val']) && isset($assoc[0]['val'][1]['val'][4]['val'][0]['val'][0]['val'])) {
That's a hell of an if statement on line 235, which is funny because you're running an isset() on the same array key twice.
Ah accidental public code reviews.
- good idea, the ebay for gamers. Marketing is going to be the challenge here, of course.
1) This many sound stupid, but I couldn't for the life of me figure out what the logo was (is it a button?). That's probably just me though.
2) I agree with zhyder that it would be best if you don't show games that have no sellers. The whole offering a price to a seller was a little weird for me.
3) You have an impressive amount of games on the site, and the homepage banner (the guy holding the wiimotes) is very good. Anyone just dropping by gets the feeling that the site is very active, and that's great.
4) How does the 100% guarantee affect the company's bottom line? As a potential buyer I think "Great!" but as an entrepreneur I think "uh oh." How does that work out?
Again, excellent site. My brother's a huge gamer, and I'll tell him to check it out the next time he's looking to buy the next title.
http://blog.dawdle.com
Other than that... It was fairly easy to figure out and use (until the problem above. ;-).
In my Linux, the text seems okay and perfect although my computer lacks any Lucida typefaces.
Not a huge deal, but I had clicked "By Genre: Role-Playing" link on the home page and couldn't narrow down to platform.
As others said - a viable idea and it is already very well executed. One major functional issue I see is this:
# Having games and systems and accessories all mixed up is confusing. I would divorce these into separate parts of the website. At the very least I would ensure that games and systems/accessories won't show up on any list (i.e. For Sale) together, at least by default.
Few comments on the appearance and visual design:
# Logo needs to be redone. Right now it's completely unmemorable and bland looking. In fact replacing it with just a word "Dawdle" would improve the appearance of the page. Tag line needs to be removed from the logo too. I'd aim at something simple and similar to GameTap and Valve's Steam logos.
# Front page feels "busy". The "For Gamers, By Gamers" insert is a high-contrast item with too much text. It's largely useless, no one is going to read it. I'd go with a more saturated background color and remove the text.
# Font in the top menu looks funny. One pixel size too small.
# Putting "TM" after a StandingOffer is cheesy.
# Looking at this page - http://www.dawdle.com/product.php/resident-evil-outbreak-pla... - Seller rating in the top-left corner says "3 stars", the rating at the bottom of the page - "4.5 stars". And I am not clear who this seller is to begin with.
# Shaded buttons on the same page are nice. But they are inconsistent with the top menu - I'd style the menu the same way the buttons are.
Lastly, a feature suggestion if I may (I haven't registered an account, so perhaps you already have it). Consider the fact that most gamers are kids/teens and have very little money of their own. It would make sense to allow their parents to fill their dawdle accounts with "buying credits". This is not easy to implement by any means, but it may prove to be a great way to facilitate buying part of the business.
Again, great idea and implementation. Good luck !
Stupid lawyers.
Curious, is there any motivation for someone to sort by the 1-star rating?
I don't like the middle panel either. The text doesn't say anything meaningful, and the buttons don't really add anything. I would change the buttons to something like "Games", "Consoles", and "Accessories".
This is a good example of the second strategy.
I'll bet that's how it's going for quite a few of your potential customers.
I clicked on Bargain Bin on the home page and couldn't find out how to restrict the listing to Xbox 360 games. The links I found removed the bargain bin restriction. When I clicked in Xbox 360, I immediately got a listing which started off with the systems, which I am definitely not interested in. A landing page with recent releases and recent top sellers would be more appropriate, especially if it made it easier to separate the systems and games.
I assume your business is a game-specific price comparison portal. It's not a bad idea, but you may need more content before you provide value over game store sites (ebworld.com) or game review sites (gamespot.com). Along those lines, why would I log in? There doesn't seem to be any community content that would require me to identify myself.