[–] swayvil 3y ago ↗ The more naive the observer, the simpler the pseudorandom algorithm necessary for apparent randomness.For a paramecium a=a+1 might do. [–] 082349872349872 3y ago ↗ Humans attempting to be random are not that much more sophisticated than the putative paramecium; they can be predicted with a 16 bit model: https://this1that1whatever.com/miscellany/mind-reader/Shanno... [–] osculum 3y ago ↗ Online version for those who want to try it: https://web.media.mit.edu/~guysatat/MindReader/index.htmlI ended up doing better by choosing the answer myself, than by using a die. Go figure.
[–] 082349872349872 3y ago ↗ Humans attempting to be random are not that much more sophisticated than the putative paramecium; they can be predicted with a 16 bit model: https://this1that1whatever.com/miscellany/mind-reader/Shanno... [–] osculum 3y ago ↗ Online version for those who want to try it: https://web.media.mit.edu/~guysatat/MindReader/index.htmlI ended up doing better by choosing the answer myself, than by using a die. Go figure.
[–] osculum 3y ago ↗ Online version for those who want to try it: https://web.media.mit.edu/~guysatat/MindReader/index.htmlI ended up doing better by choosing the answer myself, than by using a die. Go figure.
[–] kelsolaar 3y ago ↗ Excellent and well written reading, really liked the graphs to illustrate how the various algorithms loop.
[–] matt_attack 3y ago ↗ For some reason I thought this was about https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamond-square_algorithm
5 comments
[ 0.21 ms ] story [ 14.3 ms ] threadFor a paramecium a=a+1 might do.
I ended up doing better by choosing the answer myself, than by using a die. Go figure.