This seems to be unverified? imho sketchy article without any real links to back things up.

Dupe of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32718327

A dupe of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32718327 from a week ago with no new info whatsoever.

Edit: Oh, TFA is from a week ago too.

Is this the same leak as last week? In that case, this article does nothing to confirm it more than previously.

Last weeks leak was weak because the sample data was exclusively public info.

FTA:

> Troy Hunt, creator of data breach information site haveibeenpwned, posted a thread on Twitter to verify if the sample data is genuine or not. For him, the evidence is “so far pretty inconclusive”.

Troy Hunt's Twitter thread:

https://nitter.net/troyhunt/status/1566565409939427328

And the reference:

> This is so far pretty inconclusive; some data matches production info, albeit publicly accessible info. Some data is junk, but it could be non-production or test data. It's a bit of a mixed bag so far.

Edit: Twitter -> Nitter

Debunked over and over. This is just more clickbait.