Ask HN: What jobs will be big in the future that don't exist yet?
I'm writing a kids' book for my daughter about future jobs. All the books that she currently has talk only about current jobs (chef, firefighter, librarian, etc etc). I'm putting together a list of future jobs that she can think about (space mining engineer, neural lace technologist, prompt engineer, etc). I'll probably throw some jobs in the list that exist but are still rapidly growing, like data scientist.
Fun ideas appreciated!
107 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 159 ms ] threadRobot Janitor: as more and more robots take over menial jobs someone’s gotta clean and maintain them.
Virtual Friend: become a friend to a random person online. Chat with them, play games, etc. will be more and more common as the loneliness epidemic grows exponentially over the next few decades.
Prompt Expert: a person who comes up with better and more creative prompts for AI generated content. Including AI generated images, music, and likely movies and shows, architecture and design in the future.
How about "Virtual Non-Romantic Matchmaker". Pair up lonely people with similar interests who just want to be friends and play games, etc.
Wonder how much of this could be solved by removing the automation around matchmaking in online games. I used to find a server with a good ping and mods / rules that I liked and then I'd usually see the same people day after day, eventually people would start saying "hi" to me or laughing at my gameplay even though I made minimal effort to connect with them.
Someone recently commented on HN that online cheating is a social problem, and can be solved by playing with a curated group of players. I agree, and think this could also help with cheating.
I think this could be a job for the same people who work when a tree fall in the middle of the road and they remove it.
> Another equally depressing tech-inspired service in Maniac is called FriendProxy, a fictional company that lets you hire random strangers to pretend to be your close friends. As one customer notes, “I have real friends, this is just more convenient.”
Let's go ahead and add AdBuddy to your list:
> Targeted advertising takes its logical next step in Maniac with AdBuddy, a company that lets you pay for other products and services by listening to some schlub read advertisements to you. Can’t afford a train ticket? Ride with an AdBuddy. Hungry? AdBuddy will pay for your lunch — if you listen to advertisements while you eat.
1. https://www.inverse.com/article/49305-maniac-netflix-adbuddy...
Virtual AI Friends that are better than humans on how they deal with you are more likely to exist.
https://www.theverge.com/2021/10/14/22726534/waymo-autonomou...
hasn't that happened already?
Reminds me of those services in Japan where you can hire people to act as relatives or simply be there to talk to.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rental_family_service
I suspect online versions either exist already, or will exist soon enough.
Lunar colonist? (Similar, though "colonist" might be a bit less hyper-optimistic a title.)
Fusion power plant operator.
Nanoengineer.
"Impossible food" flavor/texture/etc. artist. (Kinda like a chef, with not-quite-Star-Trek food-making technology.)
These jobs are not going to be given to anyone but the overqualified and irreplaceable anytime soon, a massive failure of space programs. Personally think the boring inconsequential types who society won't fulminate for years over their loss should undertake such risks and them alone. There's more at stake than some idiotic bad press here.
> Nanoengineer
Degrees in nanotechnology have been available for 2 decades now, it's basically a combination of materials science heavy physics and chemistry combined. We also had a bit of biotech thrown in, which I think is probably the most exciting future of nanotech as it stands today.
Here are the assumptions it's based on:
1. Not content with having burned through earth's resources, transmuting them in to garbage and pollution, we fly to space, a hugely energy intensive enterprise which sources even more raw materials to convert in to garbage and pollution.
2. Having had unlimited energy in the form of fossil fuels, humanity causes climate change bad enough to eventually wipe out most species and all of civilisation, driving humans to the very brink of survival. Now, given a new unlimited power source, what next? Escape all responsibility and push forward business-as-usual for a few more decades, maybe a lifetime, to ensure that we eventually asset-strip everything in reach and wipe out all hope for humanity to ever rebuild a civilisation.
3. ???
4. But as all the cattle die off due to the heat, we'll still have burgers with a satisfying mouthfeel, so that'll be nice.
2. Nuclear is the only obvious alternative to fossil fuels.
3. ¿¿¿
4. There's no reason to believe handling climate change is hopeless, and there's reason to believe it's hopeful. The biosphere's natural lifespan[0] not so much.
0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_far_future "500–600 million -- By this time, carbon dioxide levels will fall to the point at which C3 photosynthesis is no longer possible. All plants that utilize C3 photosynthesis (≈99 percent of present-day species) will die.[76] The extinction of C3 plant life is likely to be a long-term decline rather than a sharp drop. It is likely that plant groups will die one by one well before the critical carbon dioxide level is reached. The first plants to disappear will be C3 herbaceous plants, followed by deciduous forests, evergreen broad-leaf forests and finally evergreen conifers.[69]"
I have a dystopian view of the future world so I think a lot of tech work will focus on monitoring, analyzing and predicting. AI is going to play a big part of it but I don't think General AI is going to be easy. Most likely people will simply train AI accordingly, like the mainframe operators. Low pay but stable work.
Tech archaeologist?
Going forward a hundred years probably someone has to dig some tech and manual out and re-create them. A lot of the material is online now but imagine what happens if archive.org is forced to shutdown and the data is lost forever to the general public.
They are called “Amazon Mechanical Turks.”
The dystopian future is already here. It just isn’t evenly distributed.
Like.. Imagine Yellowstone blowing. Whoever survives the winter is gonna be the ones who knap.
eMUA - someone who can spruce up your online avatar with the latest looks or graphical techniques/trends. Like going to a IRL stylist.
Privacy Agent - someone you pay when your personal/online details has been hacked into to resolve the situation. Or someone you pay to do a periodic check-up to mitigate them being stolen. Similar to a lawyer who you call when you’re in trouble or a bodyguard to stop you getting into trouble in the first place.
(In the context of finding innovative ways to recycle garbage for rare resources.)
- Landfill miner;
- Waterfighter (like firefighters, but to quash leaks in barriers built to contain rising seas);
- Antarctic illegal migrant (after temperatures rise and becomes too dangerous to move into the global north due to xenophobia);
It's extremely dangerous to go out during flooding when water is more than ankle or knee deep or so. I suspect that what a waterfighters job would be is more like going out in amphibious vehicles to rescue humans ala https://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/1...
Maybe Landfill archeologist too!
A person with a small electric (Ford Transit, etc) sized van that drives around dense urban area and retrieves sidewalk based/pedestrian area, stuck/failed/inoperable food/parcel delivery robots from public places and returns them to some regional repair depot.
2028: “You want to write a prompt? First you need to hire 10-15 promptOps Engineers to build out your PromptFlow pipelines which sends promptjobs to your PromptLake from the PromptQueue using the EventPrompt stream”"
https://twitter.com/chrisalbon/status/1567688342124503040?s=...
We don’t think too carefully today about optimizing water usage, or protecting houses from wildfire. But there’s billions of dollars in assets that rely heavily on those things. So jobs linked to preserving their value will increase.
I think the problem with this is that it is very optimistic. The costs of doing all this work has to outpace (by some margin) the economic value of the asset being protected multiplied by how long the asset will be protected for. For that equation to work out positively depends on climate change being slow and gradual, not rapid and sudden.
However, the CO2 outputs and temperature rises are exponential, not linear. Because they're a function of exponential population and economic growth.
Many in-place fixed assets which are vulnerable will simply be abandoned, and the huge infra projects will never be viable (or the window of viability passed decades ago).
You are already seeing it in New York (where no serious protection plan is in place) or Miami, where you're seeing deadly apartment building collapses because they couldn't spend $15m quickly enough to do the protection work (and, of course, if the apartment block was in a poor area and less profitable, it would never be economically viable to fix the problems).
Edit: just to say though, I think you are quite right, jobs related to this will increase, just wanted to point out that the economics of many of them are complex/fraught propositions.
ex. Person who remote controls a fleet of a dozen trucks to get them unstuck or person who approves AI drawings to verify they’re not offensive