Ask HN: Do you think many posts don't get the front page attention they deserve?
But I think HN is suffering from a slightly different problem. There are so many good posts that often extremely relevant and well received content never even hits my front page, and I am on this site a lot. I often use the "Search" feature to surface articles I am interested about, and many times I happen upon posts in the 100+ votes from the past day or two that somehow I didn't even see.
I wonder if the really quick decaying algorithm paired with the amount of quality posts creates the unfortunate situation that reaching the front page or the intended audience is just a matter of pure luck. Have we reached a singularity point where Hacker News has become too popular and on average too interesting that content relevant to your interests rarely reaches you?
EDIT: ironically, this post is now on the front page. If there's one thing I love about this site, is how it's slightly biased in favour of Ask HN and Show HN posts. Even in such a massive forum, everybody gets their 15 minutes in the spotlight.
113 comments
[ 7.3 ms ] story [ 293 ms ] threadI never use the front page because I have little interest in what the collective finds interesting. I only ever check the newest page and I have showdead set to true so I can see things as they come in, and I think that's a far more interesting way of consuming HN, if you can tolerate the occasional spam imploring you to buy earthmoving equipment.
To use a movie analogy. The top half of the first page are all blockbuster superhero movies. Everybody likes them, they sell more than any other movie, but it's not exactly the cool niche indie movie you're looking for that drives you to this place every day.
I hate blockbuster superhero movies. I must be an outlier, otherwise they wouldn't be making them.
/new could be good, but there's far too much spam to go through. Checking out new posts quickly turns you into a janitor where you spend too much time vouching or flagging stuff instead of just looking for something interesting.
I really don't want to pile even more work on dang's shoulders :-)
Upvoting/downvoting tags would encourage memeing and create even more spam. Steam has community tags w/ voting, and sometimes you find very hard games tagged with "Relaxing".
Perhaps people tend to assume that the size of the front page reflects the volume of posts that deserve attention.
Maybe front page size should be configurable; someone could make a browser extension for that.
That's an oversimplification, of course, because every user has a different fitness function for what's interesting. So the optimal front page would be something like the front page that aggregates everyone's fitness functions in an optimal way, whatever that is.
I'm not saying HN gets there, or close. But it's not for want of trying, and we at least know what we're trying for.
For example, a layer over the basic front page might offer stories thought to be of greater interest to each individual user - essentially, a recommendation algorithm. Maybe submission/commenting patterns (which are basically available [0] via the API) could be harnessed towards this - taking the hypothesis that users interact with stories which most interest them, and there are patterns of similar interest between people?
Or maybe there are other opportunities; for example, if story voting was made available per user via the API, this would add an additional stream that roughly signals "this interests me". (Although of course this miight consequently cause other problems...)
[0] https://hacker-news.firebaseio.com/v0/user/jl.json?print=pre...
I still want to figure out how to build software for everyone to participate in this system, but have been stuck for years on "how would that not just be a clone of the upvoting system". That said, anyone who wants to nominate a story for a second chance is welcome to email us at hn@ycombinator.com. People do this, and we always take a look and usually put the submission in the pool.
The only thing that's kind of a bummer is that well over 90% of the time, people are just asking for their own material to be put in the second-chance pool. That's fine to ask, and we're fine to do it if the article passes muster, but it's not really in the spirit of the thing to use it for promotional purposes. I always feel better when people email about an article they have no personal stake in, but just found interesting.
An example is: "Rust 2024 the Year of Everywhere?" — https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32945978. Decently well received, yet completely missed my radar, and I'm in total Rust immersion this week. That's just an example from today, I don't have other examples for you because I don't write them down.
Could it be possible that this one didn't last long on the front page because of #comments > #votes, and HN tends to downrank these as hot topics?
Lists of front page stories, ordered by the amount of time they spent on the front page, can be found by clicking 'past' in the top bar.
I'll guess that you're trying to stay on some sort of "I want to read all the interesting stuff...that makes the cut at HN" (and maybe a few other sites) diet. Vs. read everything interesting on the internet, which is hopeless. HN's size still makes that a pretty large intake.
> "Have we reached a ...point where...content relevant to your interests [emphasis mine] rarely reaches you?"
In theory, HN could try to categorize stories, so users could focus more on their own interests. How HN did that wouldn't need to resemble how "mainstream tech news" sites do it. Say, create a few categories that many stories fit into, and many folks often don't want to see. Then put some checkboxes in the user profile - "Hide these story categories on the front/second/etc. pages". Maybe add an "invert" feature, so when you're bored you can look at all the stuff normally hidden from you. With a limited number of categories, that might not imposed much server-side load. (Just cache all possible versions of the front page, and add "&categories=0x.." to the URL for each user?)
And since a few/most comments don't understand this post check out 'past" and see if it represents what you thought HN was talking about yesterday
https://news.ycombinator.com/front
I've tried recently to click into the Ask sections more because I think that is the place that can have more value, collective discussion and the knowledge pool that is available here is incredible, this is what I find most disappointing about a lot of other resources, such as reddit, it often just becomes trash when the potential to discuss ideas and develop concepts / learn from others is the reason any of these tools excite me to begin with.
There are so many things I wish I had people to talk to with, to help try and figure them out, not necessary just tech issues, often places like stack overflow etc is a good place for that, but more, life, personal, career etc.
HOWEVER I don't think this means they need to (or even should) appear on the home page!
In general, though, it seems like the first hour or two after the post is crucial, and if it doesn't receive enough upvotes in that window, it never will. So there's a lot of timing and "luck" involved.
I don’t think this is entirely true. Posts can be flagged as an indication of downvoting (though there could be other reasons for flagging as well). When more people flag posts, they do go down in ranking. That’s my understanding and I do use flagging as a mechanism to push posts that I’d rather not have featured.
Personally I use 10 points as the minimum limit, that's usually a good indicator that a post already got some traction (yet it might be still removed or flagged later) https://hnrss.org/newest?points=10
Even 100+ vote threshold is still too much content, and at the same time you lose a lot of cool, niche articles.
If the issue is posts that drop off the front page before they are seen, you might like using Wayne Larsen's https://hckrnews.com as an interface. It gives you a chronological list of all posts that get enough votes to break out of "new".
A few months later I got an email from the mods inviting me to submit it again, since they saw it could interest folks in here. I did it and it got hundreds of comments.
So at least there's some mechanism to "salvage" potentially interesting stories, although it's a black-box to me :)
There's been a few blog posts about the best time to post. For example:
https://blog.rmotr.com/the-best-time-to-post-on-hacker-news-...
In fact, sharing this information encourages others to game the system, lowering the overall quality of the content.
I remember pool because I visit it daily (after I found it mentioned in some thread).
From that point on, we continued to research this problem and are working on an improved HN frontpage website right now, which takes live data from HN and factors out the feedback loops. It should be ready to use soon. If you want to get early access or get notified, please write me an email.
Consider two posts, with upvote rates p1 and p2 with p1 =2p2. That is the first is twice as good as the second.
Now if the second post is half as old as the first it would actually have about 2x the score of the first, despite being half as good.
This suggests more quality posts will get a chance to sit on the front page but each may stay less time — if so this would exacerbate the OP’s concern.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28405819
Joking aside, the only way to get to the front page is either via pure luck, and lots of it, or on a bring-your-own-upvoters basis. I think it's normal with the amount of traffic, users, and submitted posts that we see here. The front page became, over time, an expression of what the "general audience" of techies like - an intersection of their interests, not a sum. It's perfectly natural given that there are only 30 articles on the front page - the competition is fierce, and you can't get there by relying solely on people interested in particular content. It reminds me of elections: while you may be able to get something by relying on your die-hard electorate, to actually win you need to appeal to just about anyone and their cat...
I don't agree. I hit the front page with ~50% of my own content submitted by me or others and I know others who also had good success tailoring their posts for HN users. Sure, luck plays its part as does the time of the day/week. But you can help the luck a lot by considering your audience.
Then again, I'm a sample of 1, so don't listen to me :-)
How many submissions are you talking about? I only found this:
https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=github.com/viraptor
But I guess I didn't go back far enough, because there are a couple of posts from 2015 with 200+ votes: https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=viraptor.info
Is there another domain?
I rarely post, and when I do it's in early EU morning. 90% of the time, I don't get more than a single upvote, while I've found late US afternoon to have better luck. Not sure if European early birds are a tough crowd, or if Western evening/night time users are more generous.
That will probably get automatically and/or manually detected and get the submission flagged or killed and the user/site banned if they do it too much. From the FAQ: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html
> Can I ask people to upvote my submission?
> No. Users should vote for a story because they personally find it intellectually interesting, not because someone has content to promote. We penalize or ban submissions, accounts, and sites that break this rule, so please don't.
> Can I ask people to comment on my submission?
> No, for the same reason. It's also not in your interest: HN readers are sensitive to this and will detect it, flag it, and use unkind words like 'spam'.
They didn't ask for comments or votes.
Users may notice and then flag and/or email the mods.
Also, if the new users make a lot of silly comments like
> This is great! Is the best post/app I've ever seen!!!
it will increase the chance of making people angry and flagging the post.