Ask HN: How influential can physical appearance be in professional environments?
I'm talking about ugly/good-looking, fat/fit, skinny/strong, tall/short... etc.
Do you think physical appearance plays an important role to define hierarchies inside organizations and can decide who has the upper hand in debates?
171 comments
[ 4.9 ms ] story [ 229 ms ] threadHowever, there are obviously many possible arguments on subtle cause/effects with correlated characteristics etc.
I provide no references, but plenty exist if you search.
( Sardinians are the shortest population in Europe,and Lithuanians one of the tallest )
Here in Lithuania Engineers are paid very well and are in high demand. For "very well" I mean compared to the average salary in the country, obviously you will get less money compared to UK or Germany. Cost of life is way cheaper than UK or Italy, both food and rent/mortgage is less than the other two countries
People who take care of themselves tend to have their life together. Correlation vs causation and all that.
Works well in careers where interacting with people might be more important than proficiency at the job.
> Here the authors find that inferences of power from photos of the faces of the managing partners of America’s top 100 law firms significantly corresponded to their success as leaders, as measured by the amounts of profits that their firms earned. More interesting, this relationship was also observed when judgments were made based on photos of the leaders taken from their undergraduate yearbooks, before they began their careers or entered law school. Facial cues to success may therefore be consistent across much of the lifespan (approximately 20–50 years).
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258189428_Judgments...
There is also - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halo_effect - which is different from the above but obviously related.
https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/33197/1/Ru...
It's already shown that facial attractiveness can predict athletic prowess:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1474704918801369
So it's likely that people's abilities can influence their appearance. There was a lot of evolutionary pressure to develop abilities to judge people based on appearance, so we would expect humans to be really good at it.
It what now? What athleticism cues other than body-fat are you getting from a face?
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.22.453412v1....
Pro athletes are also a tiny, tiny, tiny fraction of the world's athletic population.
Presentation has a lot of power. We're all shallower than we'd like.
You can game this with little effort. Dress well, maintain a good haircut and pretend to be confident.
Smell is a very primal sense, pretty much linked to our "you are in danger" response.
Are you stating that all scents are fear inducing?
Forcing someone to consciously suppress that impression upfront is fighting against some pretty basic "am I safe?" instincts.
When is the last time smells helped you avoid a toxic human?
Of course the effect is subjective and varied, but oftentimes I've found that people that claim a decision being down to appearance to be those that blame their computer when their code doesn't run :)
Perhaps some fields demand this like marketing where certain sorts of marketing are hard to quantify/value objectively so you need to show confidence so that the department keeps its funding!
People who are by their own admission lack confidence will not enter situations where the probability of rejection is high. Confident people will enter a greater number of these situations, and will continue to enter them even if they were rejected previously.
Yes it exists and think it's incredibly important for people to be aware of the power of their own physicality and not to abuse it.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-discrepancy_theory
I just wonder where we were today without those favorable attributes?
I am certain it is a net positive without trying to abuse it, but I've been thinking about it a lot since graduating. Everyone just treats me really well and places a lot of completely unwarranted trust in me.
I've had a situation where I was asking a tall/attractive/charismatic acquaintance for technical advice and he stoped me and said something like "Why are you asking me for advice, you are way more experienced than I am". It's not that I shouldn't have talked with him about the technical matter, just that it was funny that I slid so naturally into the 'underling' role.
And a warning: in your situation you may not know if "you are way more experienced" than he is (he may just be stroking your ego to divert you). I've been in the same situation where time revealed the other guy was hoarding information to his advantage. I talked him into a bit of a reveal.
I think the fact that most people would not seriously consider short guys as a marginalized group is proof itself of how marginalized it is. It’s hard not to be resigned to it. The biological marker that associates height with (physical and mental) fitness is just too strong.
At the end of the day, we are all blessed to have an opportunity on this mortal realm and we all have to move on and live life, but sometimes I wish that more people had the same empathy that you’re showing.
I think society thinks its important to socialize men in particular to "listen to authority without complaining" and this not-so-subtly tells certain men that if people don't treat you with respect then its your problem, not theirs.
One thing I hate about the contemporary American political landscape is that its all in on the false dichotomy between personal responsibility and a well conceived society. Both things can coexist and in fact require one another.
In fact, even though republicans love to talk about "personal responsibility," in a free market it is one of the least required things: the market tells you what to do with yourself on pain of penury. Its really in a society where conventions like social welfware can be abused where people's personal responsibility, character and civic virtues really matter.
The market isnt some ethereal thing that magically coerces people to do things. The market is made up of other people, all of whom are also exercising their personal responsibility to look after their self interests. Game theory is the best way to look at this.
Certainly the shift to remote work and remote interviews has helped though.
I’ve mostly been remote for the past decade so it’s hard to quantify what things would be like now.
I never thought of sailing as the perfect hobby for short people, except in boring weather conditions.
Maybe headroom for sleeping, not actually sailing as a sport?
What if you're only short on some weekdays; do you time-share a boat?
Around people you spend time around it's pretty easy to lance that perception if you carry yourself w/ confidence, make good eye contact, say smart things, etc.
Definitely, but you're hand waving how hard that is (not that I would know, being a tall white person like OP). It's like saying "just be funny."
Edit: I'm sorry, I glossed over the "force of personality" part. This might take you a few years to get right, but since it boils down to "be more assertive" the only way to get better is to consciously work at doing it. It is the same as building any other habit.
My shoulder doctor is short but a godsend for diagnosing and fixing my shoulders worn out from bad swimming habits.
I don't quite get the "physical fitness" thing b/c someone who is short can be in excellent shape. On measures of sheer mass and strength such as football, bench press or reach (e.g., basketball) perhaps they don't score as high. But for example, the short guys can usually run your ass off, come back and laugh at you while you can barely breathe. So there are sports where they excel.
We had a short guy in high school who could play basketball like Bob Cousy: he could beat the opposing team almost by himself! He was unbelievable. But his dad wanted him to help run his service station so we just had him for a few games.
Honestly, it seems that men get more of their problems from social aspects of their fathers than they do from their physical aspects (e.g.,physique).
In reality I think people working remote haven’t worse off.
While I think height does play a role, as a slightly below average height male I’ve personally never had an issue dominating / being defaulted to after brief interactions.
While this trend / tendency does exist and imo is extremely strong genetically (looking to the “alpha”), a few words can shake that tendency in most rooms.
I think being better groomed, fit, etc probably plays an overall larger role in terms of projecting competence.
Being confident and speaking with conviction in statements likely outweighs everything
I've been successful in my career (I think) because I've (often) used my physical presence and all the advantages it gives me to give the floor to quieter voices, marginalized opinions and I really feel like my teams have been great teams because of that. When you enable great people, great things happen. I was looking forward to that just being the norm.
However, at this company I found myself marginalized and discriminated against. I think because of my age, maybe because of my social class or maybe because of all the accidental advantages I have. I don't know and I don't really care.
Anyway I left them.
So it can swing both ways, just enjoy the ride. Good luck.
BUT…
Amongst the vast majority of the most capable, successful, and broadly well-respected people I have worked with, their status has had little to do with their beauty. I am thinking of folks that are not “attractive” in any conventional sense, yet their wits and competence and heart makes them so.
In certain professions, the effect of beauty is outsized. I hardly need name these; look for shallow aesthetes and cameras. In technical professions that value actual competence, I have found that it doesn’t matter (much.)
I've witnessed very competent and attractive female colleagues get discredited for their appearance, every comment implying that they fucked their way up to their position, or being unable to be close friends with any male coworker for the same reason.
But all in all dressing appropriately to your body, being clean and well groomed is a positive for everyone.
Similar to the statistical correlation with tallness (though again whether that's a matter of taller than average people doing well because they are taller or because physical height is correlated with better diet/socio-economic group as a child etc).
This stuff is always so blurry because of confounding factors and inability to control for other factors.
How Earlobes Can Signify Leadership Potential (https://hbr.org/2011/11/how-earlobes-can-signify-leadership-...)
It will be interesting how much of a shift we'll see with more work from home. Do the same effects carry over in calls and async communication? Will "more video calls" mean attractiveness plays a larger role? Will doing voice calls weaken that (or focus it on the voice alone)?
These are biases. They can be overriden by the experiences of people in a community quite easily, but towards unfamiliar people these biases can be quite strong.
Dating pretty people in New York quickly illustrated how dull most "pretty" women are. The one thing I'll never understand is how shaving my head actually increased my perceived attractiveness with women - admittedly I'm a weird somewhat unattractive person.
- https://www.premiumtimesng.com/entertainment/naija-fashion/2...
- https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/the-necktie-syndrome-wh...
Attractiveness:
- https://www.geekwire.com/2014/study-ugly-men-tougher-time-ra...
I think a lot of people are using studies like this to justify some shortcomings in their life when you can easily look around the people you know and see hugely varied outcomes regardless of looks. And good looks can be a career trap too, especially if you actively rely on them.
And one more thing: by far one of the most important physical appearance factors is youth. Which goes away for the best looking. And it also clearly shows the importance of other factors as we don't have a world full of 22 year old CEOs.
Here are a couple of seed links for further investigation (I have no clue about their quality):
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=pretty+privileg...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiOI4tF2uo&ab_channel=zoeun...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiOI4tF2uo&ab_channel=zoeun...
--
I have some ideas, anecdotes and personal experiences on the topic (as I'm traveling a lot as a digital nomad and I tend to talk to people wherever/whenever since I solo travel).
I'm sorry that I can't make this comment razor sharp (also in brevity, it's tough to do). The reason I'm sorry for that is because I know that this is a sensitive topic and I might step on some toes. I don't intend to, but it might be a bit inevitable. Some people might think that speaking from personal experience is not enough. And yes, it's definitely biased, but I am noticing I am learning a lot more about European/western society (as a Dutch person even) than I was in the past 10 years simply because I talk to a lot of people.
I'm currently traveling a lot and in daily life I see a huge difference to how people treat you when attractive. In The Netherlands I'm at best average in attractiveness (I've asked for brutal feedback from multiple people, and I'm averaging 6 out of 10). However, in other countries I'm seen as slightly more attractive because I'm about 190 cm, which is 6.23 feet/inches (whatever you Americans use). Dutch people are one of the tallest if not the tallest in the world. So I'm more common there. Already in Germany, I'm seen as more attractive due to my "language skills" (Dutch people speak better English than Germans, on average, I definitely do; combined with some conversational German/Italian and some basic French). And I do notice the difference. And I'm beginning to get a hunch that in Southern Europe I'm even seen as more attractive since they're a lot shorter on average.
All of this is based on how I interact with women. I've noticed that men don't really act that differently around me. I've been in Lisbon and Berlin recently and met all kinds of people. But yea, I'm seeing my own "pretty privilege" (however marginal) in the dating market. People treat me differently whereas I stay the same.
And I'm definitely hearing stories of how very stereotypically attractive women are getting whatever they want (even if they don't want it). I'm also hearing how stereotypically attractive women are more prone to having experienced sexual violence. So if you think they have it easy: I'm not going to compare, I'm not going to judge. I know too little, but what I do see is that less stereotypical attractive women seem to talk less about having experienced sexual violence (again, I might be biased, my sample might be biased, something else might be off - it's just my personal experience and it does beg the question to formulate a hypothesis and investigate if one would be an academic feminist/psychologist, provided there is no research on it).
But looks influence stuff in daily life so hard that it must have a strong effect in corporate culture as well. This is especially the case since men are the assertive sex when it comes to the mating game, and men are holding more economic/political power than women.
Humans are not robots. We can't keep our emotions fully hidden or suppressed. ...
>But compared to my untrained self, I'm an order to two order of magnitudes better, and it has definitely helped me to make my inner world more relatable to other people. Knowing how you present yourself in a: 1 on 1 conversation, group conversation and presentation... It's important and has little to do with personality and looks
Do you think people would care as much about your inner world if you weren't tall?
A lot right? I have been rejected at least thousands of times. You get desensitized and go after what you want.
Before I got any date, it was first 3 years of pure rejection. Some people don’t have the heart and courage to carry on. But when you get through that period, not much is stopping you.
And I don’t think that would matter much, except for the first 5 minutes. I was highly fantastical in my speech when I showed my inner world. People mentioned I should try writing fiction.
Thank you for an interesting self-assessment. While you're closer to the the average reported height there, I would think that height, as a desirable trait tops out at around 6'7" (~200cm) as back problems or bumping into doorframes becomes more likely.
And given what you've said about yourself, what height, build, and features are considered attractive in the Netherlands? Any notable differences between the men and women there in traits they find desirable whether stated or actual? What about along the along the lines of age groups and marital status (i.e. single, in a relationship, married, divorced)?
Who would be a common example of the "societally attractive" 10/10 in the Netherlands?
What emotional traits are considered desirable(e.g. stoic, relaxed, agressive, etc.)?
How "loose" are the people in Amsterdam? Popular culture stateside exaggerates it out to be a libertine utopia with an unlimited supply of sex drugs, but from what I've read through first- and second-hand accounts, many of them tend to be "shy" (at least relative to Americans) or "friendly, but reserved".
https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/715141
Unfortunately voice is just another factor that comes to genetics. I've been training to lower my rather high-pitched voice and voice projection for years now, albeit without much to show. Guess I hit the limit of my genetic potential.
There are definite obvious advantages in certain physical characteristics.
But it’s trivial to overshadow those with either
a. being really good at what you do
b. Being socially approachable
c. Deft at playing the political game
I do not foresee a future where an American political party nominates a 5ft3in (1.6m) man as a Presidential, or even Senate candidate. Similar for playing professional level sports, or lead actor in movies.
If he was auditioning for his roles today, I doubt he gets them. Especially because actresses are nowadays just as tall or taller with heels, why bother having to do all the work to make the actor look a little taller than the actress, when you can just hire another actor.
>Sports will lean towards whatever physical characteristics benefits the sport.
Of course, but in many popular sports, being taller and bigger makes you so much faster and stronger such that if you are first percentile in size, no realistic amount of talent will give you an advantage.
For sports, I think it's better to look at the reverse. Not every 7' person makes it to the NBA or is even good at basketball. But, there are plenty of relatively smaller players in the NBA who do well and some are even super stars. The classic example was Mugsy Bogues, but Steph Curry is 6'2" in sport where height is so important.
Pick a sport where height isn't necessarily a dominating factor like the NHL and there are plenty of players under 6'.
It is not a hard cutoff, but the probability of success with a certain height can decrease exponentially as height decreases.
Kevin Hart is not a leading actor either, he is the comic relief. In the movies I have seen, Dwayne Johnson is the lead actor. For example, Kevin Hart would not be Captain America, or even Black Panther. In fact, I think one of the Captain America movies showed the guy being short before he was enhanced and turned into Captain America.
You would not be able to sell a 5ft 3in actor as the fantasy escape for who people who want to fantasize about who they could be or the leader they would have.
This is wishful thinking.
You're looking at it the other way around. You wouldn't get fired for being 'ugly', but you could be treated less well than your co-workers, or not be offered a pathway to a higher-level job with better compensation.