Women said Covid shots affect periods. A new study shows they’re right (washingtonpost.com) 23 points by nosianu 4y ago ↗ HN
[–] [dead] puffoflogic 4y ago ↗ [–] oaktrout 4y ago ↗ Just because something doesn't pop up in the original trials doesn't mean it's not real, that's why they do post-marketing studies.Also the mechanism makes sense, women's period timing is notoriously sensitive to threats (critical illness, sickness, trauma). [–] lp0_on_fire 4y ago ↗ Pretty bold of you to declare "Disinformation" without at the very least citing your claims that:1) The background of these women are "antivaxx movements".2) That theses reports are deliberately false.3) That these side effects are "so-called". [–] chimineycricket 4y ago ↗ >There were obviously women in the vaccine trials and they didnt report anything like this>women falsely reporting these so-called side-effectswhich is it? did women report side effects like this or did they not? you have conflicting statements here.
[–] oaktrout 4y ago ↗ Just because something doesn't pop up in the original trials doesn't mean it's not real, that's why they do post-marketing studies.Also the mechanism makes sense, women's period timing is notoriously sensitive to threats (critical illness, sickness, trauma).
[–] lp0_on_fire 4y ago ↗ Pretty bold of you to declare "Disinformation" without at the very least citing your claims that:1) The background of these women are "antivaxx movements".2) That theses reports are deliberately false.3) That these side effects are "so-called".
[–] chimineycricket 4y ago ↗ >There were obviously women in the vaccine trials and they didnt report anything like this>women falsely reporting these so-called side-effectswhich is it? did women report side effects like this or did they not? you have conflicting statements here.
[–] ncmncm 4y ago ↗ What I had read was that spike proteins in the bloodstream were found to collect in ovaries. Have not seen any follow-up on that. Has there been any?
6 comments
[ 4.7 ms ] story [ 22.9 ms ] threadAlso the mechanism makes sense, women's period timing is notoriously sensitive to threats (critical illness, sickness, trauma).
1) The background of these women are "antivaxx movements".
2) That theses reports are deliberately false.
3) That these side effects are "so-called".
>women falsely reporting these so-called side-effects
which is it? did women report side effects like this or did they not? you have conflicting statements here.