6 comments

[ 0.19 ms ] story [ 27.7 ms ] thread
Just because something doesn't pop up in the original trials doesn't mean it's not real, that's why they do post-marketing studies.

Also the mechanism makes sense, women's period timing is notoriously sensitive to threats (critical illness, sickness, trauma).

Pretty bold of you to declare "Disinformation" without at the very least citing your claims that:

1) The background of these women are "antivaxx movements".

2) That theses reports are deliberately false.

3) That these side effects are "so-called".

>There were obviously women in the vaccine trials and they didnt report anything like this

>women falsely reporting these so-called side-effects

which is it? did women report side effects like this or did they not? you have conflicting statements here.

What I had read was that spike proteins in the bloodstream were found to collect in ovaries. Have not seen any follow-up on that. Has there been any?