The good thing of standing up to bullies in a privileged place like SF is that there is essentially no downside, only missed upside.
Also talking about missed upside...once your net worth is 10M (Parag should be there I think) you have "fuck you money" special powers over everybody including people like Musk, Bezos, Gates etc.
There is no amount of money that would convince a mentally stable and financially secure person to deal with these bullies bullshit.
Show them the finger without looking back, never love your passions more than you love yourself and your mental health.
For me that number could be around 100k because I have no problems overriding my passions in order to not deal with bullies BS.
For some people their passions are strong so they need a higher number.
For some unfortunate people there is no number and put up with bullies because some craft has penetrated their brain so much that they cannot stop doing it .
You can definitely spend $150+/yr in passive income in SF (or NYC or Miami), but at some point you have to realize that you're stuck on a hedonic treadmill and greed has graduated to avarice.
$10m is a monumental amount of money for one person to have, even in SF.
Parag is right, it turns out people don't like the feeling of pissing in the ocean. So many don't even bother adding a pic or changing their assigned username.
What you and deluded Musk call "bots" are the same demographics which creates throwaways on Reddit and also on here just to answer a comment which enraged them.
It's logical, and also proven elsewhere. It always amazes me the logical leap that cult members are willing to go through in order to elevate the cult leader who can't do no wrong.
No this was just Parag failing to read the room. You'd think a CEO of his level would appear more strategic when talking directly to a potential private buyer.
Regarding Twitter's failure to disclose the number of bots. Musk is well within his rights to squeeze the tomato before he makes a price offer.
Musk is right though: What are they actually doing? It took them a decade or so to build an edit button despite having a head count of almost 8000. Reddit has less than 1000, and they are supporting a lot more features than Twitter.
I have a hard time seeing Twitter as anything but a communist make-work program & propaganda dissemination platform. The politics are obvious, and extend to other companies as well.
The obvious answer is working on non user facing features. Advertising platform, infrastructure, harmful content filters, propaganda as a service, etc etc
What is Musk actually doing? Tesla is a 20 years old company, supposedly decades ahead of everybody and still hasn't matched the number of Porsches on the road.
And I said Porsche. The quintessential luxury brand, not Ford or GM. Yes I know that people love their Porsches and are willing to spend money to keep them around and also collect them, but still it's crazy that a company which should be the backbone of the industrial economy still hasn't matched the number of Porsches.
Twitter is a Tesla without the shameless hype and constant astroturfing and manufactured consensus.
Musk also launched SpaceX to get humanity to Mars, Starlink for global Internet, Boring Company to decrease traffic congestion, and Neuralink to improve brain I/O
How many of these ventures fit the quadruple requirement of:
1) Being practical, not purely aspirational
2) Not burning more money than they make
3) Not constantly requiring capital raises
4) Not needing government subsides and corporate welfare
Musk is 50 and hasn't managed to light up all the 4 requirements at the same time. Enough with the BS. Especially here people should be skeptical because game recognizes game. In SV all the aspirational stuff is vaporware and BS. Mars, tunnels and brain comms. All BS.
This definitely sounds like a shit take, but I largely agree. Twitter had the original TikTok but was too incompetent to see the potential. I’m not going to say they haven’t added any features this decade, but I will say that none of them have been successful.
Its strange, but I find myself agreeing with Musk heavily on the direction of Twitter.
Twitter has a lot of potential but major cultural and directional change is
needed at the company, it's become too much of echo chamber for one demographic being progressive liberals and cancel culture.
In the early days of twitter, one of my former companies had ALOT of success with niche lead conversions to their SAAS. Twitter used to be a critical part of their sales funnel. I used to be able look at customer conversion data, and tell exactly what year the target market started checking out of twitter.
I think there is still a strong market for extremely short-form content like tips/tricks, daily anecdotes, jokes, etc for users. We all have times in the day , where we are stuck waiting for a couple mins for something like a keurig or starbucks. This is where short-form content is king, and can drive engagement effectively to other services.
> Musk is right though: What are they actually doing? It took them a decade or so to build an edit button despite having a head count of almost 8000
True that they didn't get anything done and that they suck (I mean personally I hate twitter and almost everything about).
But in fairness a statement like 'what did you get done this week' is what would I believe be called 'parental'. Similar to a parent complaining that a child is not cleaning up their room or 'playing games' (back prior to video games).
Must doesn't want to actually have a conversation and understand what is going on he just wants to display his power in a stupid way. With a put down as if there is even going to be an answer to 'in a week'.
A: You are causing harm.
B: What did you get done this week, tho?
And here are the cheerleaders saying B is right, B's a hero, B's our man.
Leaving whether or not Parag Agrawal is worth the suit he wears for another comment, he was definitely right that Musk was causing harm with his tweets. Again.
Also highlighting how all-over-the-place Musk has been from the beginning re: twitter. Signing an accelerated contract for $44B one day and wanting out the next is nothing new in this process, which has been chaotic from the get-go.
32 comments
[ 4.9 ms ] story [ 55.6 ms ] threadThe good thing of standing up to bullies in a privileged place like SF is that there is essentially no downside, only missed upside.
Also talking about missed upside...once your net worth is 10M (Parag should be there I think) you have "fuck you money" special powers over everybody including people like Musk, Bezos, Gates etc.
There is no amount of money that would convince a mentally stable and financially secure person to deal with these bullies bullshit.
Show them the finger without looking back, never love your passions more than you love yourself and your mental health.
For me that number could be around 100k because I have no problems overriding my passions in order to not deal with bullies BS.
For some people their passions are strong so they need a higher number.
For some unfortunate people there is no number and put up with bullies because some craft has penetrated their brain so much that they cannot stop doing it .
10m is not fuck you money in sf.
$10m is a monumental amount of money for one person to have, even in SF.
But I guess in that case you might as well take the bag of money and go live not in sf.
That's way less than even yearly compensation as Twitter CEO.
You’re being caught.
What you and deluded Musk call "bots" are the same demographics which creates throwaways on Reddit and also on here just to answer a comment which enraged them.
It's logical, and also proven elsewhere. It always amazes me the logical leap that cult members are willing to go through in order to elevate the cult leader who can't do no wrong.
Regarding Twitter's failure to disclose the number of bots. Musk is well within his rights to squeeze the tomato before he makes a price offer.
And I said Porsche. The quintessential luxury brand, not Ford or GM. Yes I know that people love their Porsches and are willing to spend money to keep them around and also collect them, but still it's crazy that a company which should be the backbone of the industrial economy still hasn't matched the number of Porsches.
Twitter is a Tesla without the shameless hype and constant astroturfing and manufactured consensus.
1) Being practical, not purely aspirational
2) Not burning more money than they make
3) Not constantly requiring capital raises
4) Not needing government subsides and corporate welfare
Musk is 50 and hasn't managed to light up all the 4 requirements at the same time. Enough with the BS. Especially here people should be skeptical because game recognizes game. In SV all the aspirational stuff is vaporware and BS. Mars, tunnels and brain comms. All BS.
Twitter has a lot of potential but major cultural and directional change is needed at the company, it's become too much of echo chamber for one demographic being progressive liberals and cancel culture.
In the early days of twitter, one of my former companies had ALOT of success with niche lead conversions to their SAAS. Twitter used to be a critical part of their sales funnel. I used to be able look at customer conversion data, and tell exactly what year the target market started checking out of twitter.
I think there is still a strong market for extremely short-form content like tips/tricks, daily anecdotes, jokes, etc for users. We all have times in the day , where we are stuck waiting for a couple mins for something like a keurig or starbucks. This is where short-form content is king, and can drive engagement effectively to other services.
10/10
True that they didn't get anything done and that they suck (I mean personally I hate twitter and almost everything about).
But in fairness a statement like 'what did you get done this week' is what would I believe be called 'parental'. Similar to a parent complaining that a child is not cleaning up their room or 'playing games' (back prior to video games).
Must doesn't want to actually have a conversation and understand what is going on he just wants to display his power in a stupid way. With a put down as if there is even going to be an answer to 'in a week'.
And here are the cheerleaders saying B is right, B's a hero, B's our man.
Leaving whether or not Parag Agrawal is worth the suit he wears for another comment, he was definitely right that Musk was causing harm with his tweets. Again.
Also highlighting how all-over-the-place Musk has been from the beginning re: twitter. Signing an accelerated contract for $44B one day and wanting out the next is nothing new in this process, which has been chaotic from the get-go.