This is so brilliant because it's funny and persuasive, and the fact that it's funny is essential to what makes it persuasive. Just a wonderful piece of self-referential writing, that also serves a serious purpose.
Well, the Court's right wing now has a secure majority that doesn't even need Roberts, and their opinions smashing precedents are not stellar works of legal reasoning.
Is this different from FBI reaching out directly to facebook and making them remove content. Mark admitted that FB was(is?) guided by the FBI on their content policy. I find that more insidious and 'dangerous' than the case above. I find it even more surprising that there is no commotion about this.
12 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 39.9 ms ] threadIt used to be a lot more edgy. And cynical.
I guess you can’t take risks once you’ve achieved a certain amount of fame.
The phrasing of this is very odd indeed
> He was charged with disrupting a public service
> sets dangerous precedent undermining free speech
Is this different from FBI reaching out directly to facebook and making them remove content. Mark admitted that FB was(is?) guided by the FBI on their content policy. I find that more insidious and 'dangerous' than the case above. I find it even more surprising that there is no commotion about this.
Persuasive, funny, well-reasoned, learned -- absolutely amazing.