Genuine question, if Amazon is knowingly selling this product to minors and they are aware if its intended use, how is this being “blown out of proportion”?
She’s representing a client and putting up what she thinks is the most effective way to argue their case. Amazon will put up whatever they think their best defense is. A court will decide who is correct.
I personally found the repetitive "no household uses" to be a weak and sensational argument. There are any number of uses for something like this for someone who might have a hobby involving these chemicals.
Plus, it's not like there aren't many things _with_ household uses that can be used for suicide too.
10 comments
[ 4.5 ms ] story [ 34.6 ms ] threadNobody likes lawyers.
It's a regrettable system, but it's hard to blame the lawyer for having to work within it.
She’s representing a client and putting up what she thinks is the most effective way to argue their case. Amazon will put up whatever they think their best defense is. A court will decide who is correct.
Plus, it's not like there aren't many things _with_ household uses that can be used for suicide too.
This is some better call Saul lawyering
Might as well go after them for selling caffeine powder..