The sarcastic fringehead's broad-mouthed display is reserved for fighting (nytimes.com) 81 points by Petiver 3y ago ↗ HN
[–] cecilpl2 3y ago ↗ I have to admit this is not what I expected to be reading about when I clicked on it. [–] imoverclocked 3y ago ↗ It got me too. At least the title doesn’t have an illicit reference to Stripers. [–] guerrilla 3y ago ↗ This is the kind of clickbait I can get behind :) [–] DonHopkins 3y ago ↗ It was so much better than I imagined it would be! [–] allochthon 3y ago ↗ Sometimes the New York Times editors have fun with the titles of lighter articles, in a good way [–] rootusrootus 3y ago ↗ Yeah I was thinking "oh crap, sarcastic fringehead is probably not a totally inaccurate description of me, I wonder what it says..." [–] tomrod 3y ago ↗ I mean, it still applies to me even though it is shared with a fish :DThis was a fun article! Thanks OP!
[–] imoverclocked 3y ago ↗ It got me too. At least the title doesn’t have an illicit reference to Stripers. [–] guerrilla 3y ago ↗ This is the kind of clickbait I can get behind :) [–] DonHopkins 3y ago ↗ It was so much better than I imagined it would be! [–] allochthon 3y ago ↗ Sometimes the New York Times editors have fun with the titles of lighter articles, in a good way
[–] guerrilla 3y ago ↗ This is the kind of clickbait I can get behind :) [–] DonHopkins 3y ago ↗ It was so much better than I imagined it would be! [–] allochthon 3y ago ↗ Sometimes the New York Times editors have fun with the titles of lighter articles, in a good way
[–] allochthon 3y ago ↗ Sometimes the New York Times editors have fun with the titles of lighter articles, in a good way
[–] rootusrootus 3y ago ↗ Yeah I was thinking "oh crap, sarcastic fringehead is probably not a totally inaccurate description of me, I wonder what it says..." [–] tomrod 3y ago ↗ I mean, it still applies to me even though it is shared with a fish :DThis was a fun article! Thanks OP!
[–] tomrod 3y ago ↗ I mean, it still applies to me even though it is shared with a fish :DThis was a fun article! Thanks OP!
[–] thisisauserid 3y ago ↗ It's a fish. New meaning of clickbait. [–] themitigating 3y ago ↗ It's in the science section of the paper and the article features a picture of the fish on top. I've also never heard the term "Sarcastic Fringehead" use to describe a type of personality and that's the actual name of the fishhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcastic_fringehead [–] Croftengea 3y ago ↗ Thanks, this saved me from figuring how to bypass their "free article limit". [–] pharrington 3y ago ↗ op made a pun [–] blaser-waffle 3y ago ↗ As in, literally a fish, called the sarcastic fringehead.Headline is kind of a pun / clickbate. [–] [deleted] 3y ago ↗ (comment deleted)
[–] themitigating 3y ago ↗ It's in the science section of the paper and the article features a picture of the fish on top. I've also never heard the term "Sarcastic Fringehead" use to describe a type of personality and that's the actual name of the fishhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcastic_fringehead [–] Croftengea 3y ago ↗ Thanks, this saved me from figuring how to bypass their "free article limit". [–] pharrington 3y ago ↗ op made a pun
[–] Croftengea 3y ago ↗ Thanks, this saved me from figuring how to bypass their "free article limit".
[–] blaser-waffle 3y ago ↗ As in, literally a fish, called the sarcastic fringehead.Headline is kind of a pun / clickbate.
[–] emptyfile 3y ago ↗ When subscription based "premium" newspapers start doling out the click bait, you know the end is near ... [–] unethical_ban 3y ago ↗ NYT is premium, and newspapers have always had articles on sciences. [–] [dead] biggoodwolf 3y ago ↗ [–] reaperducer 3y ago ↗ It's not clickbait. It's called being clever, and something that newspapers have done for centuries before internet griefers came along. [–] systemvoltage 3y ago ↗ Idk, there is not much cleverness is finding some random obscure thing and trying to shoehorn that to propel an ideological message. [–] cocacola1 3y ago ↗ The article is entirely focused on the fish, though. Where's the ideological message? [–] systemvoltage 3y ago ↗ In the headline, and the entire article is not about fish. It’s a commentary about society. It dog whistles to their readerbase. [–] volleygman180 3y ago ↗ And it's even nearer when links to those articles are posted on HN [–] benj111 3y ago ↗ It isn't click bait.The fish is literally called the sarcastic fridgehead.If the title was "the goldfishes broad mouthed display is reserved for fighting" would that too be clickbait? [–] bombcar 3y ago ↗ The title on HN changed, it was originally posted as something like "When Sarcastic Fringemouths open, beware" [–] [deleted] 3y ago ↗ (comment deleted)
[–] unethical_ban 3y ago ↗ NYT is premium, and newspapers have always had articles on sciences. [–] [dead] biggoodwolf 3y ago ↗
[–] reaperducer 3y ago ↗ It's not clickbait. It's called being clever, and something that newspapers have done for centuries before internet griefers came along. [–] systemvoltage 3y ago ↗ Idk, there is not much cleverness is finding some random obscure thing and trying to shoehorn that to propel an ideological message. [–] cocacola1 3y ago ↗ The article is entirely focused on the fish, though. Where's the ideological message? [–] systemvoltage 3y ago ↗ In the headline, and the entire article is not about fish. It’s a commentary about society. It dog whistles to their readerbase.
[–] systemvoltage 3y ago ↗ Idk, there is not much cleverness is finding some random obscure thing and trying to shoehorn that to propel an ideological message. [–] cocacola1 3y ago ↗ The article is entirely focused on the fish, though. Where's the ideological message? [–] systemvoltage 3y ago ↗ In the headline, and the entire article is not about fish. It’s a commentary about society. It dog whistles to their readerbase.
[–] cocacola1 3y ago ↗ The article is entirely focused on the fish, though. Where's the ideological message? [–] systemvoltage 3y ago ↗ In the headline, and the entire article is not about fish. It’s a commentary about society. It dog whistles to their readerbase.
[–] systemvoltage 3y ago ↗ In the headline, and the entire article is not about fish. It’s a commentary about society. It dog whistles to their readerbase.
[–] benj111 3y ago ↗ It isn't click bait.The fish is literally called the sarcastic fridgehead.If the title was "the goldfishes broad mouthed display is reserved for fighting" would that too be clickbait? [–] bombcar 3y ago ↗ The title on HN changed, it was originally posted as something like "When Sarcastic Fringemouths open, beware" [–] [deleted] 3y ago ↗ (comment deleted)
[–] bombcar 3y ago ↗ The title on HN changed, it was originally posted as something like "When Sarcastic Fringemouths open, beware"
[–] swayvil 3y ago ↗ This is a fabulous "Did they actually read the article?" test. [–] [deleted] 3y ago ↗ (comment deleted)
[–] MichaelCollins 3y ago ↗ I feel kinship with this fish. [–] dudeinjapan 3y ago ↗ OMG I've found my spirit animal.
[–] ck2 3y ago ↗ ah "sarcastic" in the literal - ancient Greeks had great words for so many thingsMy (un)favorite is "demagogue" they knew it even then.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demagogue#History_and_definiti...
33 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 92.8 ms ] threadThis was a fun article! Thanks OP!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcastic_fringehead
Headline is kind of a pun / clickbate.
The fish is literally called the sarcastic fridgehead.
If the title was "the goldfishes broad mouthed display is reserved for fighting" would that too be clickbait?
My (un)favorite is "demagogue" they knew it even then.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demagogue#History_and_definiti...