So, is this person seriously thinking that, after a prolonged legal tussle between Twitter and Elon Musk, he should have left the head of legal in place? I doubt she would even want to remain, and being fired probably gives her more "golden parachute" bonuses than if she quit, but regardless of that, there was absolutely zero chance of a person in such a position remaining in place, and I would expect that all sides were aware of this.
The assertion is laughable at best. Political propaganda at worst. Not entirely sure the author thought this one through. She was almost certainly singlehandedly responsible for the thought crime filter.
Free speech for ONE side of the political spectrum. So glad Elon fired the horrible leadership team. They have not innovated in a long time, the stock was a massive under-performer (until the takeover arbitrage trade), and the platform had been decidedly biased.
5 comments
[ 6.9 ms ] story [ 28.3 ms ] thread>Gadde did more for free speech on the internet than almost anyone else I can think of.
Call an ambulance! Medical emergency! I'm dying right now of laughter.