1 comment

[ 4.3 ms ] story [ 13.6 ms ] thread
Incel is a term invented by the CBC to define something that has been happening/growing for decades; this is a further attempt to villainize men. This is women using sex as a weapon and losing. Women broke the social contract and are now extremely unhappy with the consequences of their actions.

https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/Intel...

The absolutely NOT a paradox reality of female declining happiness. Today we are at record lows for female unhappiness. Mind you, places like Canada, we are one of the happiest countries in the world. This is because men are pushing the average up. Women are disproportionally depressed and medicated. The paradox allegedly being so much great egalitarianism has occurred and women ought to be much more happy. No paradox truly exists.

This egalitarianism has been fantastic for men, and a select elite of women like olivia wilde. Otherwise it has been extremely detrimental to women. The funny thing is the 'solution' to this paradox will NEVER come from men. Why would they change anything? It is women who have to come up with the solution to this problem. It is women who 'paradoxically' are unhappy.

>Alice discovering that the entire Victory community was a simulation run by men set on reaffirming 1950's gender roles. The men in the film follow the pseudo-scientific jargon that misogynistic spokespeople fall back on to protest progress toward equality.

The article focuses heavily on fictional movies, and thus misses the forest through the trees. Authors pushing a political agenda through fiction is great. I've not watched this movie being reference. I expect it's not connected to reality at all though.

>She also drew from incels' belief that "society has now robbed them - that the idea of feminism is working against nature, and that we must be put back into the correct place."

Jordan peterson is 1 of the few men who are trying to remedy the problem. He is obviously very pro-egalitarianism as it will be extremely difficult to find men who are against it. I expect it will be quite difficult to find men who genuinely want to 'put women back in the kitchen' as it were. You would almost exclusively need to find anonymous trolls online. Whereas I expect the 'tradwife' movement to be coming from women.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/pressure-proof/20130...

https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/11/13/20959863/women-...

The interesting thing about this Vox comic. They say things like "One culprit might be" but the wording is revealing. They clearly don't understand why women happiness is declining. But then breaks down into 'women do most of the chores' which in my mind is literally an argument against themselves.

The reality is, if men try to help, they get attacked like Jordan Peterson. Thusly women are on their own to solve this problem.