2 and 3 star reviews. 1 star reviews, in my observation, are consistently along the lines of "UPS left the package in the rain! 1 star!", which has fuck all to do with the product.
Such things are still part of the overall purchasing experience, though. If I'm about to order a product online and for whatever reason there may be delivery-related challenges involved that others have experienced, I'd certainly like to know beforehand.
Also people who don’t seem to understand how the product, their life and the universe in general work. The “can’t make coffee from cat litter, blames Obama in all seriousness, two typos per word” kind. I always wonder how these people look in real life and if I meet some of them on the street.
Its the outcome of gutting the educational system, poor methods of teaching (instead of teaching critical thinking they teach how to take the test), and just the fact that in a country of ~332 Million the bottom 20% could be like 67 million people(the bottom 20% is not a direct correlation but still you get the point).
In my experience its always best to leave negative reviews in 3 star reviews. 1 star reviews get buried/removed, but if you let that criticism sneak into a 3-star review it's likely not bad enough for the platform to notice.
Fakespot does its best, but Amazon and similar don't expose very much information to determine if a review is fake (be it manual review OR via a service like Fakespot).
Plus there are two kinds of "fake reviews": Automated reviews ("spam"), and then reviewers who got free samples/paid. The second is almost impossible to detect as real people are really writing the reviews (and even calling them "fake" is hard because the person may still give an honest review sometimes).
You can sometimes spot fake reviews, but that is just due to laziness, if they're trying even a little bit it could be very hard to spot in particularly at volume. I will say one good trick is to read "new" reviews rather than most helpful/liked, since they game those too.
I've had two fairly detailed, not low-effort, reviews not approved for publication on Amazon.co.uk recently. After the first I swore I'd never bother again (it was pretty high-effort to be honest, relatively) but something got the better of me.
Neither time has there been any indication of what the problem is (I guessed the first one was my reference to a 'knob', as in for turning, which the product had - but couldn't find any such similar Scunthorpe in the second) and even if they did give you some idea, they invite you to start again from scratch - not edit it, it's not saved, not even your photos. I'd love to see click-through metrics on that, does anyone bother?
I had the same experience. Id say they just don't approve most of the reviews.
I would think most (real) people only leave a good review when things go EXTREMELY WELL. Not the same for bad reviews though, which means real people will more often than not leave reviews pointing problems and shortcomings than praising a product. That, at least in my head, would result in less sales and so making the review workflow painful for the user is by design.
I just checked on my account and I have 126 published reviews on Amazon. I can recall around 10 that were denied, about half of which seemed "OK, that's fair in retrospect" and a modest edit and resubmit got them published. The other half of the denies I couldn't really figure out and just ignored (some of which were solid product, 4 or 5 star reviews).
I have several 1-star reviews among the published.
Online reviews and rating systems do need an overhaul. I once tried to leave a review of a poor experience I had while staying at a short-term rental property, sticking to the facts with no melodrama; and the platform rejected my review as being "against policy". There's clearly no incentive at all for the platform to accept anyone's poor review, since that would mean less business for the platform.
Not to mention all the e-commerce reviews that are along the lines of, "1-star: item was perfect and was everything I wanted it to be but it arrived three days late" or "5-stars: item sucks so bad that I returned it but the platform's return policy is great".
In case of e-commerce reviews are crucial not sure of ratings. If I’m buying an item and couple of reviews point out something wrong in design or usage I avoid it. Without reviews it’s not possible
I was pretty disappointed with Netflix after they canceled the star system. Before they cancelled it they could fit my likes to other people with similar likes, after they cancelled it they could insist their own content was good enough for everyone.
Consequently, the only way I pick what to watch on Netflix is using either ratingraph.com or a browser plugin that shows ratings from other sites directly in Netflix's UI (don't remember what it's called at the moment).
I kind of wish Amazon would have three up/neutral/down vote options... product, seller, amazon platform... so that they can distinguish between customer service experience and the product itself. Then aggregate the scoring into an overall review experience.
Leaving descriptive reviews ranked by positive/negative on the product itself. An leaning heavier on "insightful" feedback to shape rankings a bit.
I see plenty of web stores where all google reviews are from people who didn't buy anything: competitors. You can buy them by the thousands positive or negative, its not very expensive. The worse part is that [for a fee] these services offer guaranteed ratings. If you purchase 100 and one is deleted a new review will be posted, it continues until the count is back to 100.
The bad reviews are not obvious at all. Even if you could spot them 100% of the time the average customer thinks they are real.
Things are so bad the EU now requires any review system to be able to prove the reviews are from actual customers. Removing negative reviews is also not allowed.
I start with negative reviews, looking for well-written ones with specifics.
The fake ones are often absurdly easy to spot, with mindless cheerleading, lists of features regurgitated verbatim, and fully spelled-out product names. That's my favorite: ridiculously complete product names with taglines, practically only missing the (tm).
I read the 3-star reviews myself. I find the negative ones on Amazon often received the wrong product (a concern to be sure but that's just the chance you take with literally every Amazon product), or misunderstood what the product did. And then I try to find details that are repeated across several reasonable-sounding reviews.
I've not had very much success with this approach, to be honest. I still just feel like I'm rolling the dice.
Fake reviews are not the only problem. It's the fact that most reviews are going to either be from someone who loved the product enough to take the time to write about, or had such a bad experience (which could be anything and maybe not related to the problem) that they feel compelled to write about. So you wind up with 5-stars and 1-stars and not much inbetween.
It seems like this is a thesis that could be tested empirically. It makes intuitive sense to me, but if I’m honest, that kind of inverted bell is not what I actually see very often on Amazon.
I have not done any systematic check, but I often see this type of inverted curve in product reviews. -- Though either the 5-star side or the 1-star side will be significantly higher than the other.
Amazon has a lot of paid-for reviews, so you would likely see it if you remove the paid entries.
In some cases on very bad products, you see tons of 5 star reviews and a lot of 1 star reviews - and if it's high on the fakespot list, I can only conclude it's a bad product.
I've mostly given up on Amazon except where I can't find the product elsewhere (or on time).
I still use amazon a lot.. but not always reviews... often I know the product I'm looking for. I'll also tend to look at the negative reviews.. are the reviewers just not knowledgeable about what they bought, broke in shipping, or actually a bad product/seller. It will vary a bit. What sucks, is competitors will pay for bad reviews too.
I'd go farther with this thought experiment. As long as the reviews are done by consumers that are not trained or practiced at the art of reviewing, you will expect a lot of "worked for me" and "I paid enough that I am compelled to like this" style reviews. It is literally the idea behind luxury pricing.
Turns out, objective reviewing of items is difficult. And will almost certainly lead to a gaming of the reviews if the companies are able to do so.
I'm more inclined to review if it's a technical product and there aren't already (many) quality reviews, good or bad. It's really hard picking certain items from the pack, and sometimes unless you already know, you have no idea.
Most people don't try all the alternatives and so they have no idea if this is good or not. You buy something, it seems to work so cognitive dissonance won't let you give it less than 5 stars as that implies you didn't choose the best.
I really want someone try independently try then all, but that is expensive and a lot of work so few do.
I'd like to think I'm pretty good at spotting which reviews are fake, but I'd love to do a test to find out if the ones I thought were real were actually fake.
It won't be long before someone writes a GPT-3 model that can write hundreds of different reviews indistinguishable from real ones, and that sound and look different from each other, based on a product description and images.
How does this kind of transaction take place? I've bought plenty of things on Amazon that I've left 5 star reviews for, including electronics, but haven't once been approached with refunds or incentives.
I've often received little cards in my orders asking for a screenshot of a 5-star review in exchange for a 90% off coupon for my next purchase, or something like that.
Come to think of it, I believe I've had such material come with some of my purchases but I've ignored them because I'm so advertising-averse. I'll have to pay attention for these next time. haha Though I still won't leave a 5 star review if I don't genuinely think the product is worth that.
I assume all online reviews are faked or at least biased. I don't believe any of them, especially those that appear on the same site or include affiliate links to the product being sold.
I tend to believe the review distribution. For a reasonable product, they're usually normal distributions. For a bad product, they're almost always bimodal.
Lower ratings most of the times are honest reviews and if seller replies to them you can see how much they care about the customer and if they are being honest business
If the seller/owner responds to a negative review, this is a red flag for me. Indicates a sort of hypersensitive, pressuring attitude. I empathize that they might wanna "tell their side" but in the end it betrays a clingy monitoring of Your Image that makes me as a potential customer feel like I may be walking into a spiderweb.
How do fake reviews on something like Amazon work? Wouldn't they only allow you to leave a review if you have purchased the item?
I get that for a cheap product a seller could have a bunch of dummies buy it and then leave reviews, but that... doesn't seem very viable for most things.
Or are normal people getting paid to leave high reviews for something they bought and would not normally review?
Easy. Check out some telegram channels. There, people get offers for specific products. You order them, write a review, send in a proof and then get reimbursed for the item. So you can keep items for free. In some cases you even get some extra money on top.
They do allow you to leave reviews for things you didn’t buy from them (there’s a “verified buyer” tag for people who did buy it directly) but here are two other very common scams:
1. I receive emails offering to give me free stuff in exchange for reviews, with the promise of more if they’re good. You can also find job site posting which are similar: get paid to review products, strongly implying that you get more for 5 star reviews. I haven’t actually done this but I’d be shocked if they gave people time or latitude for fairly reviewing anything.
2. I’ve had cards included in Amazon purchases offering freebies for positive reviews - just include a link in your email and get an Amazon gift certificate.
Amazon makes reporting these difficult and the frontline support tend to be confused if you try, and nothing visibly happened when I did. Clearly they do not care about this problem.
Since you're intending to fake the review, you don't have to actually send the product. You only lose the shipping costs and the platform fees. And even if the platform handles fulfilment, since you control both sides of the exchange, you can take your unopened product and re-stock it at only marginally increased cost.
What I'm curious of is how reliably people can identify fake reviews. Is it that ~30% of customers suck at distinguishing them, or is it fuzzier than that and there's an overall 30% chance the review you think is trustworthy actually isn't?
I've bought a lot of stuff on Amazon, and while I do think there's tons of fake reviews and craptacular products for sale, I've yet to come away with the same opinion of Amazon that many people have here. That is, the idea that Amazon is basically an unnavigable swamp of a marketplace. Somehow, I've avoided bad products to such an extent that I can't name a bad purchase off the top of my head. Ok, there was _one_ time I got an air filter that was used and repackaged (eww!) but it wasn't obvious and Amazon didn't know about it, and that's different than flimsy Chinese goods with fake 5 star reviews. I feel like I can spot fake reviews and other nonsense from a mile away, but I don't know if that feeling is real or not.
You are more savvy than most consumers. If you’ve been using Amazon for years you probably have sixth sense for navigating around site and content. How to interpret the reviews. All the meta data.
I suspect many on HN can too. They are likely annoyed by it and use hyperbole to express their frustration
Amazon gets away with a lot of shit because they have top notch fulfillment capability along with good customer service
There is no need to write credible reviews at the moment. When this need arises they will all be exactly the same as real reviews. Bots are already writing entire articles. Creating templates from "real" reviews is barely a challenge.
Many items from Amazon come with a “gift card for reviewing” note and they follow through (I tried it once because the item worked and was something I’d have left a review for anyway). Sometimes the gift card is worth more than the item.
You know the practice of giving incentives for reviews was banned years ago by Amazon?
You can argue it was real but can still be used to skew the results. People are more likely to give good reviews plus review sooner before it breaks or they discover something wrong with it.
It definitely still happens because I received a follow up in the mail after a purchase on amazon, more than once, in just the past few weeks offering a gift card for a good review.
I would argue that paying for reviews is inherently dishonest. So is giving away items for free for reviews.
My guess is that amazons algo internal flags users who accept faulty products, and reroutes returned products from opinionated users to the "garbage cans" who will swallow the returns generating profits from what should be trash.
They've made 100% of their customer base the garbage cans then. They commingle their inventory with fly by night resellers' inventory so counterfeits are plentiful. They combine products together. That indicates it's just a way to make customers feel comfortable clicking buy not actually allowing customers to share useful opinions.
People will happily accept fake reviews if the product is cheeper than alternatives.
Spoting fake reviews is “easy” but very hard is you know the product is 20% cheaper than alternative.
It also depends heavily on what exactly you are buying. If you are buying health supplements, expect way more than 30% fake reviews and expect a lot of products to be fake themselves. On the other hand, if you are buying something like a rice cooker, you won't run into many fake products and the number of fake reviews will be closer to 30%.
For that reason, I avoid buying supplements on Amazon unless it comes from a few brands that only use one trusted seller to push their stuff.
Funny you say that. I think I did get just that a couple years ago, a fake rice cooker. We tried to order a relatively-pricey Japanese brand and what came was clearly a no-name imitation in plain packaging. First time I think I noticed getting a fake.
Unfortunately, fake products have infiltrated just about every product segment. Even though there are relatively fewer fake products in some categories, the overall percentage of fake products is uncomfortably high and only getting higher over time it feels like.
Similarly, I wonder how many HN posts are made by shills or fake accounts to push certain technologies or tools. I know reddit gets astroturfed pretty heavily, so I'd imagine something similar happens elsewhere.
Certain technologies can appear a lot more popular than reality due to how much exposure they get on sites like HN, leading to a skewed perspective of the industry.
Seems much harder to fake an Airbnb review. You actually have to stay at the place. And since Airbnb charges a lot of fees and taxes, it’s fairly expensive to have a friend do that in order to leave a 5 star review.
In case anyone wants an example of how challenging this actually is: try to find a sleep mask on Amazon that doesn't let a bunch of light in somewhere, isn't so thick it makes your face sweat, is comfortable while sleeping on your side, and has elastic that won't fail in 2 months.
After around a dozen failed attempts I finally found a great solution 9 months ago. Of course two days back I accidentally left it in a hotel room. Trying to buy a new one by clicking the link from my purchase history brings me to a listing with completely different pictures that look nothing like my beloved mask, now includes bluetooth music playback functionality, and of course costs about 3 times more. Pretty sure I won't get the same product if I bought it again.
So really I'm wondering if my previous 5 star review counts as a "fake review" based on this study's metrics and if not what percentage on top of that 30% is earnest reviews that are for completely different products.
Had the same experience one time. I had bought something many years ago on amazon like a cable or tool and I remember needing to replace it. I clicked on the link in my orders and it took me to a spark plug or something. Vendors definitely reuse links to get traffic. It's insane.
A little bit of a digression from the original topic but I have found sleeplikethedead[1] useful in the past for sleep related products (not affiliated with them). I hope it helps your search :)
You are talking about real problems, but as an aside, judging the overall veracity of reviews based off of the fit of a sleeping mask that is usually a "one size fits all" is possibly one of the worst ways to go about it.
I can attest to that. Several I tried before went bad soon, or were impossible to keep on because they were too warm or pushing against my eyes. Although I'd still rather sleep without when feasible, this one saves the night sometimes. Shout out to @searls for praising it on Twitter. A single trusted critic is way more reliable than a bunch of random strangers with unknown intentions.
If you want something guaranteed to fit it should be bespoke. A one-size-fits-all solution for your head is almost certainly not possible. You may need to investigate custom made options.
> Trying to buy a new one by clicking the link from my purchase history brings me to a listing with completely different pictures
This is entirely Amazon's fault. Scammers have exploited it, but amazon is the cause and the only party capable of putting a stop to it. They seem to want the quality of the products they sell to be a total crapshoot
When i recall my experiences with Amazon consumer products (not AWS), it really makes me hesitate to use their products or ever work for them. I can just imagine my Product person or Manager chastising me for trying to give the customer a better experience
for example: Amazon music and audible regularly crashed on my android device (Pixel, not so bizarre brand). After getting 3 USB based cables that burnt themselves out (overheated), I refuse to buy electronics from Amazon.com and now only use best buy (their brands, not the marketplace).
The thing that offends me is when it’s BLOODY OBVIOUS that an account owner has taken a listing and switched the product while keeping all the reviews.
I went looking for a pulse oximeter and the highest rated one had reviews that were all about a bicycle storage rack.
Amazon could trivially delete these but they simply don’t give a shit.
Even in the realm of "real" reviews, there's a filtering problem.
As others have mentioned in this thread, many services will just not post a poor review. They have an incentive to make a sale, and a low star rating is going to turn a buyer away. Why push you away from the buy button when you're already on the page?
There's also the problem of incentivized reviews. I'm currently working on self-publishing a book. Standard practice is sending out "advanced reader copies" before you launch. The readers get a free book, you hopefully get some reviews to prime the pump on launch day. So far, somewhat reasonable.
But many of the platforms let you block reviewers. If you're a major publisher using something like NetGalley, you would be foolish not to filter out anyone who's ever handed out a bad review.
At best, the result is honest reviews from a non-representative sample. But it's even worse than that. The reviewers know the game; a bad review will take them off the free book gravy train. So they bias their reviews to not get cut off.
I don't know how you solve the review problem; the financial incentive for getting good reviews is huge. If you're willing to spend money, it is 100% possible to get non-representative or outright fake reviews that are indistinguishable from the real thing.
but the reviewer will notice that the negative review wasn't published. I would seriously consider to leave a platform which doesn't publish negative reviews. Even more so if the review appears to be published, but other users can't see it.
That a review is fake is my default position when researching. Review needs to be critical of the product or service in substantial ways, otherwise there is a high bar.
132 comments
[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 198 ms ] threadPlus there are two kinds of "fake reviews": Automated reviews ("spam"), and then reviewers who got free samples/paid. The second is almost impossible to detect as real people are really writing the reviews (and even calling them "fake" is hard because the person may still give an honest review sometimes).
You can sometimes spot fake reviews, but that is just due to laziness, if they're trying even a little bit it could be very hard to spot in particularly at volume. I will say one good trick is to read "new" reviews rather than most helpful/liked, since they game those too.
Neither time has there been any indication of what the problem is (I guessed the first one was my reference to a 'knob', as in for turning, which the product had - but couldn't find any such similar Scunthorpe in the second) and even if they did give you some idea, they invite you to start again from scratch - not edit it, it's not saved, not even your photos. I'd love to see click-through metrics on that, does anyone bother?
I have several 1-star reviews among the published.
It was sort of surprising amazon rejects reviews - the more you know. Only 30% being fake seems like a very low estimate
Not to mention all the e-commerce reviews that are along the lines of, "1-star: item was perfect and was everything I wanted it to be but it arrived three days late" or "5-stars: item sucks so bad that I returned it but the platform's return policy is great".
Seems like it hasn't impacted the user experience. Arguably improved the experience.
Perhaps other sites like Amazon and AirBnb should remove ratings and reviews too?
On other platforms you're spending time and money, on Netflix only time.
But when it comes to product reviews, accounts of hardware failures is super important imo.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Schumer:_The_Leather_Speci...
Leaving descriptive reviews ranked by positive/negative on the product itself. An leaning heavier on "insightful" feedback to shape rankings a bit.
The bad reviews are not obvious at all. Even if you could spot them 100% of the time the average customer thinks they are real.
Things are so bad the EU now requires any review system to be able to prove the reviews are from actual customers. Removing negative reviews is also not allowed.
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_...
It was so delicious.
(Hey, I am not a bot, these are my current experience of what I am actually reading on Amazon reviews).
More funny Amazon reviews that I found: https://eliteseller.com/blog/funny-amazon-reviews/
The fake ones are often absurdly easy to spot, with mindless cheerleading, lists of features regurgitated verbatim, and fully spelled-out product names. That's my favorite: ridiculously complete product names with taglines, practically only missing the (tm).
I've not had very much success with this approach, to be honest. I still just feel like I'm rolling the dice.
In some cases on very bad products, you see tons of 5 star reviews and a lot of 1 star reviews - and if it's high on the fakespot list, I can only conclude it's a bad product.
I've mostly given up on Amazon except where I can't find the product elsewhere (or on time).
Turns out, objective reviewing of items is difficult. And will almost certainly lead to a gaming of the reviews if the companies are able to do so.
I really want someone try independently try then all, but that is expensive and a lot of work so few do.
It won't be long before someone writes a GPT-3 model that can write hundreds of different reviews indistinguishable from real ones, and that sound and look different from each other, based on a product description and images.
How many times have I seen that on various reviews. I kind of like it somewhat, at least it means they didn’t delete it.
60% are fake but don't fool shoppers.
9% are fake but so good they fooled the researchers, too.
I get that for a cheap product a seller could have a bunch of dummies buy it and then leave reviews, but that... doesn't seem very viable for most things.
Or are normal people getting paid to leave high reviews for something they bought and would not normally review?
1. I receive emails offering to give me free stuff in exchange for reviews, with the promise of more if they’re good. You can also find job site posting which are similar: get paid to review products, strongly implying that you get more for 5 star reviews. I haven’t actually done this but I’d be shocked if they gave people time or latitude for fairly reviewing anything.
2. I’ve had cards included in Amazon purchases offering freebies for positive reviews - just include a link in your email and get an Amazon gift certificate.
Amazon makes reporting these difficult and the frontline support tend to be confused if you try, and nothing visibly happened when I did. Clearly they do not care about this problem.
I've bought a lot of stuff on Amazon, and while I do think there's tons of fake reviews and craptacular products for sale, I've yet to come away with the same opinion of Amazon that many people have here. That is, the idea that Amazon is basically an unnavigable swamp of a marketplace. Somehow, I've avoided bad products to such an extent that I can't name a bad purchase off the top of my head. Ok, there was _one_ time I got an air filter that was used and repackaged (eww!) but it wasn't obvious and Amazon didn't know about it, and that's different than flimsy Chinese goods with fake 5 star reviews. I feel like I can spot fake reviews and other nonsense from a mile away, but I don't know if that feeling is real or not.
I suspect many on HN can too. They are likely annoyed by it and use hyperbole to express their frustration
Amazon gets away with a lot of shit because they have top notch fulfillment capability along with good customer service
Was my review a real one?
You can argue it was real but can still be used to skew the results. People are more likely to give good reviews plus review sooner before it breaks or they discover something wrong with it.
(I didn’t bother reviewing the subsequent one I purchased)
I would argue that paying for reviews is inherently dishonest. So is giving away items for free for reviews.
Completely fake reviews have always been banned on Amazon and this is an article about how rampant they are.
For that reason, I avoid buying supplements on Amazon unless it comes from a few brands that only use one trusted seller to push their stuff.
Certain technologies can appear a lot more popular than reality due to how much exposure they get on sites like HN, leading to a skewed perspective of the industry.
I want to see some stay history to gauge the experience, but have seen review padding recently (tons of positive reviews to hide Bad reviews).
it seems to be a new trend
Source: Airbnb host since 2007
After around a dozen failed attempts I finally found a great solution 9 months ago. Of course two days back I accidentally left it in a hotel room. Trying to buy a new one by clicking the link from my purchase history brings me to a listing with completely different pictures that look nothing like my beloved mask, now includes bluetooth music playback functionality, and of course costs about 3 times more. Pretty sure I won't get the same product if I bought it again.
So really I'm wondering if my previous 5 star review counts as a "fake review" based on this study's metrics and if not what percentage on top of that 30% is earnest reviews that are for completely different products.
[1] https://www.sleeplikethedead.com/
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B095C7H62X?
https://www.fakespot.com/product/sleep-mask-3d-deep-contoure...
It does a pretty decent job of sorting out the obvious garbage w/ fake reviews, though it can't help with Amazon's co-mingling inventory.
0 light, no sweat and generally unnoticeable from and position after a minute or two.
Yes, you will look like a zombie.
This is entirely Amazon's fault. Scammers have exploited it, but amazon is the cause and the only party capable of putting a stop to it. They seem to want the quality of the products they sell to be a total crapshoot
for example: Amazon music and audible regularly crashed on my android device (Pixel, not so bizarre brand). After getting 3 USB based cables that burnt themselves out (overheated), I refuse to buy electronics from Amazon.com and now only use best buy (their brands, not the marketplace).
I went looking for a pulse oximeter and the highest rated one had reviews that were all about a bicycle storage rack.
Amazon could trivially delete these but they simply don’t give a shit.
Shameful company to work for.
As others have mentioned in this thread, many services will just not post a poor review. They have an incentive to make a sale, and a low star rating is going to turn a buyer away. Why push you away from the buy button when you're already on the page?
There's also the problem of incentivized reviews. I'm currently working on self-publishing a book. Standard practice is sending out "advanced reader copies" before you launch. The readers get a free book, you hopefully get some reviews to prime the pump on launch day. So far, somewhat reasonable.
But many of the platforms let you block reviewers. If you're a major publisher using something like NetGalley, you would be foolish not to filter out anyone who's ever handed out a bad review.
At best, the result is honest reviews from a non-representative sample. But it's even worse than that. The reviewers know the game; a bad review will take them off the free book gravy train. So they bias their reviews to not get cut off.
I don't know how you solve the review problem; the financial incentive for getting good reviews is huge. If you're willing to spend money, it is 100% possible to get non-representative or outright fake reviews that are indistinguishable from the real thing.
but the reviewer will notice that the negative review wasn't published. I would seriously consider to leave a platform which doesn't publish negative reviews. Even more so if the review appears to be published, but other users can't see it.