Ask HN: How do you feel about Meta's name?
When I first heard the name, I thought, "Great for Facebook/Meta, bad for everyone/everything else."
My thinking is that I do not want one of the most powerful companies in the world owning and/or controlling the metaverse, either in actuality or 'just' ideologically/brand-wise.
I'm guessing folks don't care much because of one of the following reasons:
- nothing we/they can do about it
- there are still other, if less attractive, words for the metaverse (multiverse, etc.)
- props to Zuck for doing the rename - it was a brilliant maneuver, there's nothing more to say about it.
- the metaverse is not a thing yet, so nothing to worry about yet.
- it's not ideal, but now facebook/meta will own the metaverse, good and bad, whether they want to or not
- something else?
8 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 28.2 ms ] threadIn the last few weeks I call it Meta all the time because with a stock chart like
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/META/chart?p=META
calling it "Meta" is the greatest humiliation I can inflict on them. It steams me that META is a big part of the S&P 500 index so I can't help holding it in my index funds. I wonder if we can get a shareholder lawsuit to stop Zuckerberg from setting the controls to the heart of the sun.
My guess is that by the time VR and AR are widely adopted, it will just be called "the internet."
But seriously: it’s a name that will make Metaverse as a term impossible to use as the default name for whatever AR/VR world we are collectively creating. Googalaxy or Applearth, or whatever… Meta compromised the term Metaverse by claiming it.
Also, there will be no Metaverse. Gaming in VR will become better, some interesting use cases for AR will emerge (e.g. virtual office). If Zuckerberg will announce tomorrow that they pivot to 3D displays, the whole Metaverse delusion will promptly fade away.
So for me is "meta" is like an unfinished word/sentence. No context, no meaning.