Show HN: JavaScript – How much account sharing is happening on your site? (npmjs.com)
Two years ago, I built Classtra, we had an account-sharing problem, and we knew it. But we didn't know how much and didn't know how to address it.
Fast forward two years: we built Sabil, the most accurate account-sharing intelligence tool.
Give it a try and see how much account sharing is costing your website. I'd love to get your feedback. Thanks!
3 comments
[ 2.5 ms ] story [ 19.7 ms ] threadFor example, I share prime and netflix with people...
The reason is that its "time division"
So, for example, youre paying for access to an account with 24/7 access to [RESOURCE] -- but you only personally use it for say 6 hours a day... but paying for 24 hour access... then who cares if it is me that logs in for 6 hours, and the tom dick and harry use the other 6 hours each...
you still got paid for the 24 hours of account access....
stop trying to tie every access to a single person.
I have been sharing accounts for over a decade.
If an account is paid for, GFYS.
So, account sharing, if its paid for account, is none of your business. What if I am supporting a friend who cant afford your service and youre helping out your friend?
you do not need to monetize every BODY you need to provide value to PAYER via your service.
so GFYS if you think that every individual PERSON who accesses your service "owes" you an account or payment.
seriously.
the ONLY argument against account sharing is if you don't have limits on SIMULTANEOUS how many individuals are logged on...
So - thats a better metric.
Real world example:
best friend is a dir at nflx, he has a son, a wife, a good friend and himself.
All live in different states and countries and continents.
He warned that they were going to crack down on this, but many people are like "I am a parent and I have two kids at college (all diff timezones, thus diff access times individually, given the account is active 24/7) and they should be able to access my account, why should each of them pay for access to nflx rather than "mom" just pay for an account and everyone login as we all have different schedules.
youre not paying for a user account, youre paying FOR TIME TO ACCESS WHAT YOU PAY FOR...
Why care for WHOM is accessing the account... its already paid for 24/7.
The policy should be around HOW MANY ppl you can share youre account with from a simultaneous access perspective. period.
but if gets out of control (as one company had 47 people sharing one account), that's plain rip-off and costs companies a lot of money. So it's a good idea to limit the number of devices. Many companies do that, for example Evernote limits how many devices you can use to access your own notes.
On top of that, you pay for 24 access to a device but companies would totally change the structure if they knew everyone would be streaming 24/7 it's a stats and chance game.
Also, not saying everyone has good intetions nor is everyone a bad actor. Manytimes it's just easier to share than add a paid user. Other comapnies allow you to share account for a discounted price. It's not a black and white situation :), but for anyone who wants to control or just monitor that, this library helps them.
So, yeah - a professor/instructor should allow MAXIMUM two people... but for things like PRIME and NTFLX those are usually familial shared and thus if you have ten fn kids... they should all be able to have access, however, maybe NTFLX should just ask "how many people in your family? and then add a dollar for each profile.