I'll ignore that, by your own standard, you shouldn't have made this one.
I think the more interesting point is that your standard (or a similar one - top level replies require extraordinary information) could improve discussion here, maybe by a lot.
4 comments
[ 5.8 ms ] story [ 57.6 ms ] threadI think the more interesting point is that your standard (or a similar one - top level replies require extraordinary information) could improve discussion here, maybe by a lot.
And it's true - I had to decide between a long, ungainly title and violating my own rule and chose the latter.