Ask HN: Math books you recommend just for the way they are written?
I have a favourite.
Probability Theory: The Logic of Science by E.T. Jaynes.
I just love it for the writing and the way it teaches probability. I haven't encountered any book in probability that is like this book. Every other book I have encountered are just axiom listing behemoths. This book have strengthened my understanding of probability.
Does any book come to your mind along these lines? Books that stop being pedantic where needed to first convey the topic to the reader. Then they worry about rigor.
73 comments
[ 6.0 ms ] story [ 130 ms ] thread> Does any book come to your mind along these lines? Books that stop being pedantic where needed to first convey the topic to the reader.
Mathematics books by physicists tend to be just that.
https://calculusmadeeasy.org/
The book is worth a peek just for this one chapter: https://calculusmadeeasy.org/1.html
Also, James Gleick's Chaos is a classic, as is the big original beast, Gödel Escher Bach by Douglas Hofstadter.
Since you've already got Jaynes: David Mackay's inference book is also a good: http://www.inference.org.uk/itila/ even if not quite pure maths.
Garrity's "All the Math You Missed". Brings you up to speed fast, and has great references.
In logic, "Introduction to Logic: and to the Methodology of Deductive Sciences" - Tarski.
I wish that I started studying these three books before college, in order: 1) Tarski's 2) Strang's 3) Jaynes'
If it wasn't because it's a text introducing a somewhat niche approach to quantum mechanics that didn't gain broad traction, this book would totally have been the Kernighan & Ritchie of quantum mechanics.
https://cdn.preterhuman.net/texts/math/Mathematics%20-%20An%...
Similarly, Proofs from THE BOOK, by Aigner and Ziegler presents some interesting subject matter (short, elegant, and instructive proofs) all in one volume that you'd have to comb through large amounts of mathematical literature to encounter otherwise. The results themselves should be mostly familiar to any grad student or advanced undergrad in mathematics, but the proofs are sure to amuse as well as enlighten. The one unfortunate thing about this book is that the last edition was published almost 25 years ago.
https://archive.org/details/mathematics-made-difficult
"Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers: Asymptotic Methods and Perturbation Theory" by Bender and Orszag.
I'm not sure if they meet your definition of being well-written exactly as you say above, but these are extremely well-written math books.
This isn't a math book, but I was also a big fan of "Vector Quantization and Signal Compression" by Gersho and Gray.
It’s a classic in the field(s). Available as free pdf. Sets an example for how technical books should be written.
website: https://www.inference.org.uk/mackay/itila/
- Infinite Powers and The Joy of X by Steven Strogatz
- Godel, Escher, Bach by Hofstadter
(Avoiding text books as one's mileage might vary, and having fun depends on the readers' levels as well.)
> David Tranah ... suggested that a different title would help [sales]. For once, I did not take his advice and the title The Joy of x remains available.
(to understand this locution it may help to know that, in a more prudish century, The Joy of Sex made a big impression when it came on the scene)
* The Joy of TeX: A Gourmet Guide to Typesetting with the AMS-TeX Macro Package
* The Joy of Sets: Fundamentals of Contemporary Set Theory
* X and the City: Modeling Aspects of Urban Life