13 comments

[ 5.3 ms ] story [ 32.2 ms ] thread
These victories all look rather like failures.
Any victory for anybody in the patent mess is a loss for everybody, period.
Except patent lawyers :(
I love this quote - "We think competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology, not steal ours."

Reminds me of that time when Apple invented the mouse-driven GUI.

You could say that about much of their products.
Apple licensed Xerox's tech. For a song because Xerox didn't know what it was worth.
Pretty small potatoes. I wonder what the Apple executives, canny competitors by most accounts, really expect to accomplish from the legal campaign. Do they mostly intend to raise the stakes for their lower margin competition? Delay major Android phones at a crucial juncture in the race? This gets negative PR in tech circles, but you wonder if it plays well to the broader public - the more respected brand is making serious claims that lesser brands are copying/stealing from them.

It's easy to cast this as a Heart-of-Darkness style deathmarch, but unfortunately, I think Apple is finding value in the whole enterprise, even if there isn't a resounding victory.

"Limited victory" is right, starts with 10 patents and gets reduced to one patent covering automatically linking phone numbers to bring up the dialer on click? Seems to me the result is that Apple lost rather badly in this case. This is the second time I've seen a misleading headline suggesting a Apple victory in a patent case but turns out to be a loss once you've read the details. What's the deal with that?

But really? They have a patent for making telephone numbers in a document click-able to call that number? That seems so obvious a thing to do on a phone why grant the patent? Plus, if HTC can come up with a workaround so easily and quickly doesn't that also support the thought it's an overly obvious (i.e., useless) patent? Did I understand that part correctly?

I'm pretty sure I saw that functionality in devices that existed long before the iPhone.. fucking patents.

But to be fair, an import blockade is a pretty solid victory. Unfortunately for Apple, HTC can release a software update to disable the "infringing" functionality and quite possibly reinvent it in a way that isn't infringing anything.

A blockade now would have been a solid victory. A blockade months into the future for a trivially disabled feature is pretty much a joke.

I worked on a touch pad in '99 that had this functionality, and I'm pretty sure we didn't come up with the idea.

Unfortunately we never got it into mass production, and I doubt sufficient details were released to use it as prior art. Nokia's Screen Phone might have had similar functionality.

(Search for FreePad if interested - still a few articles available)

Honestly, any win for any company in that area is a loss for the whole industry.
It'd be cool if HP would smack apple up a bit with the Palm patents.