As has been discussed to death at this point, reserves are only half the story. In order to get a sense of solvency, you'd need to understand what Binance's liabilities are. They only have calculated a tiny subset of this: user deposits.
To clarify, Binance/nor anybody else are disclosing their liabilities at all, right?
Like, as a customer, you have 0 insight/auditing into whether their reserves are 1:1 with liabilities, 2:1, 1:2, etc. etc.
It's almost like... dishonest?
Saying "look! our reserves! we're above water! we're not over-leveraged! trust us!" and then hoping people are... foolish enough?... stupid enough?... to not know to ask... "ok... and liabilities?..."
15 comments
[ 2.1 ms ] story [ 51.1 ms ] threadDeloitte.
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)
Ernst & Young.
KPMG.
In case nobody has heard (I hadn't)
Like, as a customer, you have 0 insight/auditing into whether their reserves are 1:1 with liabilities, 2:1, 1:2, etc. etc.
It's almost like... dishonest?
Saying "look! our reserves! we're above water! we're not over-leveraged! trust us!" and then hoping people are... foolish enough?... stupid enough?... to not know to ask... "ok... and liabilities?..."
It's interesting to me that the Bitcoin network itself is the ultimate authority for truth here.
They also have a guilt by association issue due to them being closely affiliated with FTX.
Their fractional reserve rates (which are inferior to tether) aren't likely to impress many who have been paying attention.