It sounds like suing a gun manufacturer after a shooting. NSO software might not be used ethically but it certainly can be used legally. They have no responsibility to disclose anything.
Selling and/or using NSO and similar software in the US, with certain exceptions about use by the government, is very arguably a violation of a couple of different US laws, including the CFAA.
They should have a public first contact and then use an exclusive and private contact for each source. A cheap samsung or huawei. iphones can't be inexpensive.
14 comments
[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 44.9 ms ] threadA private company does not.
It seems reasonable that this might prevail in court given the arguments in the post. No guarantee, but as they say, that’s why we have the trial.
Uh maybe, but you make it sound like the sue-er will lose. I would count a settlement as a win in this instance [1].
> They have no responsibility to disclose anything.
[Citation Needed]
Refusal to disclose information is why Alex Jones lost his lawsuit.
[1]: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/15/remington-agrees-to-settle-w...
They should have a public first contact and then use an exclusive and private contact for each source. A cheap samsung or huawei. iphones can't be inexpensive.
One time pads over hf seems like a decent avenue but practically eliminates all sources except for trained intelligence operatives.