Ask HN: Consultants, what tax software do you use?

33 points by Eumenes ↗ HN
I've been paying a CPA $1800 a year to prepare my taxes and realized I'm getting ripped off. Can anyone suggest tax software for a simple return (several 1099s, maybe 2-3 dozen invoices, solo 401k, minimal expenses, home office deduction, etc)?

64 comments

[ 0.27 ms ] story [ 135 ms ] thread
I used TurboTax for years. Last year I used the free tax prep offered by Square. The result was the same as TurboTax and not any more tedious to use. E-filed with IRS just fine. It doesn't handle everything TurboTax does (for example no Foreign Earned Income Exemption, no partial year state resident returns), so look at what it does and doesn't support.

You can usually deduct what you pay a CPA or tax preparer if you need to continue getting professional tax help.

TurboTax works just fine for me. Integrates with my investment accounts and handles the typical combo of 1099, W-2, and supplemental income without issue.

The dark patterns have been getting worse, though, so look up what should and should not be free for filing.

Hrm... I guess I'm not getting as 'ripped off' as some folks. CPA does my business as well as personal/home - price went up to ~$1200 last year, from $1000/year for the previous several years. 'Business' has both consulting and some real estate/rental component, but it's likely a bit low-effort for them. Has still felt like a decent deal. Having to start over and do it myself feels like it's more trouble than it's worth...
past edit time:

I realize I'm also paying $500/year for payroll via gusto, so closer to ~$1700/year overall. It's helpful for myself, but also paying any subcontractors I deal with too.

(comment deleted)
I’m moving away from software and cloud solutions, and have selected a local accountant to prepare my filings.
We’re at a similar price level. But I refuse to feed the tax software lobbying machine. They are responsible for how hard it is to file taxes, and their lobbying kills every attempt to fix it.
For a few years, I got one of the pricier Intuit Turbo Tax desktop software options. And ran it from a Windows VM that would never have Internet access after the initial updates of Turbo Tax, so Intuit couldn't steal my data.

The last few years (no longer a consultant) I've just done my tax returns manually. The IRS offers editable PDF forms, and working through the instructions isn't that much harder than going through tax software's prompts.

(The home office deduction, for example, is simply a matter of understanding the rules, and using a measuring tape, and tax software can't automate much of that for you. And, as much as you have to do a little extra work for Solo 401k contributions when you do it manually, if you're using tax software, you still have to make sure you didn't miss or misunderstand the prompts that account for the pre-tax contributions, since that could be a very expensive mistake.)

For 2022, though, I'll probably wimp out, and go back to airgapped tax software, or find an accountant (who won't inadvertently hand my data to Intuit or others). The reason is that my particular state's forms are much more work than federal and they don't offer conveniently editable PDFs. Last time, I decided I would've gladly paid $1k not to have some forms feel like they were shortening my life by years.

Find a CPA who will earn their worth every year? Software isn't ever going to replace a human who cares about other humans.
Also, business owner and independent contractors can deduct tax preparation fees, correct?
Correct, I did my own taxes one year and the next year had my CPA review them, he found thousands of dollars I left on the table, so in the end it ended up costing me thousands more to do my own taxes.

Also, one of the most important lessons to learn in business is that business expenses that come off the gross are completely different than personal life expenses that come off post tax money.

What was this thousands of dollars you left on the table? I’m always confused by these stories…did you literally just sit down with the raw federal and state forms? I’ve always used TurboTax, and it’s hard for me to understand how you could go through their process and answer all the questions and somehow miss thousands of dollars worth of deductions or credits, unless you have a very esoteric tax situation.
It had to do with a real estate sale, also I have a business that's incorporated in a different state than in which it operates so I pay multiple states taxes, etc.

I also used turbo tax, did it right (as far as I thought). That's exactly the thing, I just mindlessly filled out each step in turbo tax and did what it said, I don't truly know like my CPA does. Some of the things he does for me aren't really options on turbo tax as far as I understand.

OK, but your situation is significantly more complicated than OPs…
I have been pretty happy with QuickBooks self-employed. I have the version which comes with TurboTax filing.

You can classify all of your income and expenses throughout the year, including your home office, deductions and any other deductions that you qualify for and then it automatically transfers it over to TurboTax.

It also calculates your quarterly filings and helps facilitate paying those.

No way. That's a bargain, you are not getting ripped off. I pay more than that happily, and (knock on wood) haven't been audited or had any issues yet. I did my own taxes one year and it was a total nightmare. Say it takes you 20 hours, which is a low estimate. You would save the equivalent of 90 bucks an hour, if your rate is 90 or more an hour your loosing money. If your rate is less, your an hourly employee not a consultant. Plus you get all the support, advice, and protections that come with having a CPA.

A side point, OP and all the comments here saying CPAs are "ripping off" people is unfair. It's not easy to become a CPA, these people need to pay for school, run a business, and pay their bills and support their family like everyone else. Their time is valuable, they charge for that value. That isn't ripping you off, it's providing a service that you are buying. As a consultant you wouldn't appreciate people saying you were ripping them off just because you sold them your services.

did my own taxes one year and the next year had my CPA review them, he found thousands of dollars I left on the table, so in the end it ended up costing me thousands more to do my own taxes.

The tax situation described by OP would take more like 2 hours, not 20. The exception would be if bookkeeping is included, but I bet it’s not. And CPAs don’t get all that education and training so they know how to prepare the ultra-complicated tax return of a freelancer with a few 1099s. If you have employees or complicated accounting or whatever, yeah, hire a CPA. But their expertise is overkill here.

Source: have done my own semi-complicated taxes (multiple businesses, multiple states, real estate investments, mix of retirement accounts) for 20+ years, never been audited. Had a CPA do them for a few years, it was fine, but nothing I can’t easily do myself.

But what about the opportunity cost? Wouldn't you rather do what your passionate about and good at, not taxes? How do you know you weren't missing out on deductions, leaving money on the table?
I understand what you’re saying, I wrestled with this myself for years.

But in the end, I feel pretty confidant that a CPA isn’t going to find some magical (legal) deduction in OPs situation that TurboTax wouldn’t find. And I consider it my responsibility as a business owner to understand the basics of finances, accounting, bookkeeping, taxes, etc. It’s not that complicated at this level, any software engineer can pretty easily grasp this stuff with a little effort.

Also, CPAs are human and make mistakes, something I’ve personally encountered multiple times. So unless you check their work, how do YOU know you aren’t missing out on deductions or overpaying even if you do use a CPA? But then we’re right back to opportunity cost and expertise.

I don’t think using a CPA is a horrible idea, but you’re overstating the difficulty and risk of doing it yourself.

As I said elsewhere in this thread, the real value for me is in paying for bookkeeping and advice, but I doubt OPs $1800 includes much of either of those.

There is a reason that many tax prep services and CPAs give free reviews to folks who do their own taxes, because it's common to find meaningful deductions and mistakes that cost real money.

As a business owner I feel that its my responsibility to understand the basics of finance, accounting, bookkeeping also. I also know when it's time to ask for help and get advice and checks and balances. It's called due diligence.

You are just assuming that you've done it awesome without ever even checking. Maybe once in 10 years get it double checked, you could have been leaving a lot of money on the table and not even known it. You just say your smart, awesome at taxes, but have not proven it to yourself. Companies pay external firms to do audits all the time for exactly this reason. It's a complex subject, the laws change every year, and a good CPA (yes, there are bad ones, but again that's part of the responsibility of running a business is vetting the people you trust) will keep you up to date with those changes and help you minimize your tax burden. Mine also gives me advice, helps me when I have a business or finance question with real experience from his other clients. Who better to learn these things from than a CPA? It's not as if we come out of school just knowing this stuff. It's like a doctor, they know stuff, provide value way beyond just looking up symptoms on webmd.

Again, I used a CPA multiple times, and it sounds like your tax situation and your interests are such that it makes sense for you to use a CPA. That doesn’t mean it makes sense for a freelancer with a few 1099s to use one.
Yes, no bookkeeping with the annual $1800 fee. They do however give me quarterly estimates and remind me when to pay them, but that seems like a simple calculation I can do myself moving forward. I have 6+ years of returns they did at this point, so plenty of info to cross reference if I get stuck using turbo tax or similar.
I also look at it from a liability perspective. I pay a marquee accounting firm such that big government will likely never second guess its accurate & legal. (And if they do I have recourse on the firm.)

If you're making 6+ figures, you should be treating your business like a corporation and paying a firm to do your bookkeeping. Especially true if your the only employee because in some countries single-employee corporations can be re-assesed and taxed at a much higher rate.

The idea that you would have recourse against the accounting firm is specious. That's exactly why they have you sign something that says they've only prepared based on what you've told them. From their perspective, everything they've filed is fully congruent with what you've told them - think of them like a more advanced TurboTax. So the only benefit is that you can attribute errors to a misunderstanding, rather than your own singular willfulness.

But if your goal isn't to commit tax fraud, then you probably don't need plausible deniability. I just dealt with a tax auditor from my state, over something my CPA judged as a toss-up, and it really wasn't was bad as you'd think. To interact with them, my CPA wanted explicit direction for what to do (handle the initial phone call for me, and fish for details of what they actually want). Next, they referred me to the most knowledgeable attorney at a prestigious regional legal firm: "You likely don't have an argument, be happy if they don't come after more. If you really want I can represent you in tax court for a $10k retainer".

I decided to represent myself, typed up a few statements outlining the details and my position, and sent them in. A few weeks later, I had a phone call with the auditor and their manager where they immediately proposed that based on the details I sent they could meet me half way. I verbally agreed, the manager seemed content to have a quick amicable resolution, and a few weeks later I got the formal assessment notice with a bit of interest (no penalties). I considered that a major win given what I was staring down. A++ would get taxed again.

"I have recourse on the firm"

Don't know about your firm but for our 7 figure business, I was paying a firm 6k+ just for taxes (no help with anything else, no strategy on tax savings) and they all make you sign a 0 liability thing. Ultimately, it is on YOU if you screw up your taxes and not the tax preparer. Fraud may be an exception but unless you can prove that, IRS will ultimately hold you responsible for mistakes, not the preparing firm.

I bet you are signing that fine print somewhere.

Even if there is no true protection, I look at it that the professional is less likely to make a mistake than myself. If I make a mistake that later requires further review/justification, that is a true loss.
I wouldn't say its a bargain. I started using this firm in a very high cost of living metro area/city, and have since moved to a very low cost of living rural area. The local firms here charge 1/3rd of what I was paying. So I'm paying a premium based on where the firm is located. Its great having a CPA on your side and they are quick to answer questions, but my financial/living situation isn't changing, so at this point I can just cross reference my 6+ years of returns through them and use an online solution for a few hundred dollars. The $1800/year would be hands down my largest expense. They were very useful when I had multiple state returns and some mix of W2 and 1099, but at this point, seems fairly trivial.
Depends on the revenue that is being generated, the complexity of OP's personal and professional situation combined and what the CPA actually is doing. $1800 by itself is meaningless. It is not always a bargain just like it could be a bargain in many cases.

Lot of CPAs just do the taxes and ensure you are doing the right way. They don't really want to/care about giving you advice on how to save more. That doesn't necessarily make them bad CPAs but it also doesn't give them the license to charge crazy numbers. For example, I had a great CPA when I was consulting solo but they wouldn't help me on how to save money pre tax. I figured out on how to do a SOlo 401K which allows almost 44K per year pre tax (this was a few years ago. limit is higher now). Of course, once I told them, they said yea not a bad idea considering my situation.

So, it depends.

Just to add, you want to pay your accountant or bookkeeper enough that they can afford to stay in business and do business the right way.
I’ve always used TurboTax, and I don’t think it’s worth paying a CPA to punch the numbers into their tool instead of me punching the numbers into mine.

What’s worth paying for is: 1) bookkeeping, and 2) advice on how to structure things for maximum tax benefit, but it’s very hard to find an ethical CPA who will have any advice for an operator of your size that you can’t figure out yourself with a few hours of research.

None, taxation is theft and slavery.
I recently discovered https://keepertax.com through OpenAI, does anyone have experience with KeeperTax?

Per https://openai.com/api/ "Helps freelancers automatically find tax-deductible expenses by using GPT-3 to interpret data from their bank statements into usable transaction information."

My situation is very similar to yours. For annual filings, I just use TurboTax Self-Employed (online). I'm not necessarily endorsing it. I haven't tried other solutions out of a fear that I would miss out on potential reduction of friction from the tool not having the context of previous years' returns.

For quarterly taxes, I use my own spreadsheets, including one that implements the annualized income installment method from Publication 505. (I can't fathom how some freelancers can have income so consistent and/or a crystal ball revealing their total year income that use of simpler methods is possible.)

I do the same in April, but skip quarterly tax entirely.

The fine is only a hundred dollars or so, and TurboTax will calculate it for you and include it. For the hassle it saves, and in the context of a 5 figure tax bill, it's a pretty simple choice not to bother with it.

Interesting re: skipping quarterly taxes and taking the hit on the small penalty. I wonder if it would raise suspicion if you just stop paying estimates and pay up in April.

FWIW, Ally bank has a 3% savings account atm, so you could easily make up that penalty by parking your future tax payments in a high yield savings.

Couple states I've lived in, missed payment penalties are 10% of what was owed. Parking, say, $3k at 3% for a few months to net ... $100 to then pay a $300 fine doesn't seem to make much sense.

I've missed payments, and paid the fines, and typically it's a small % of the total tax burden, so it's not hit me hard, but I wouldn't plan to explicitly withhold payments to try to pick up small % in savings.

If you take the previous year's tax and pay that as your estimated tax (split into quarters) you avoid any penalty. Only issue is if your income drops significantly from one year to the next but you can always calculate your taxes in January and reduce your final quarterly payment in that case.
At least in Ontario 1800 would be a really good deal. I pay mine about $6000/y.

To answer your question though, Xero and it's pretty great once setup correctly

$6k per year?! That is 2x my healthcare premium. Is your situation complicated? Like employees, benefits for them, office, depreciating assets, etc?
Are you talking about bookkeeping or tax preparation? We run about a $5M annual revenue business with multiple employees, thousands of charges, tons of 1099s, and we pay $3k/yr for bookkeeping and $800 for business tax prep, $400 for person tax prep.
That’s a phenomenal deal, especially for the bookkeeping.
I’m quite surprised by the amount of commenters here that don’t do their own taxes. I feel like the numbers being mentioned are also quite high, even for those with ballooned salaries..
TurboTax business. It’s the same underlying engine tax preparers use.
There are many professional tax software vendors. Intuit products are far from dominating the market.
Just pay a CPA.

I was a contractor/consultant for a while. CPA was worth every penny (and very similarly priced). I never had to think about my taxes because my CPA knew told me everything he needed me to do.

My taxes were simple, so I could have done my CPA did, but it would have taken much longer and I would have likely missed things.

I asked Stallman what he does for taxes once and I believe he downloads the relevant PDFs and uses xournalpp for modifying/signing them as needed. I was planning to give this a go rather than give in to using turbotax like most people I know.
I use xournal for many things, but its function is only being able to mark up non-fillable PDFs. The federal forms are fillable (do them right in evince or whatever PDF viewer you use). If your state's forms aren't fillable PDFs, then xournal can save some paper and avoid handwriting errors, but that's about it.

Sometimes your taxes are simple enough to do directly on the forms, but sometimes they aren't.

(Thanks for the reference to xournalpp, I should check that out some time)

Why not DIY it? Particularly with "minimal expenses", it's really just math for what you are describing. Almost any tax software package will be able to handle what you describe.
Self-written, in Lisp dialect I made myself, based on a ledger entered into a text file (which compiles!).

Got every cent in tax I could get: capital cost allowance on business use of personal car, and such.

Used the output of the software to successfully fight tax-related misreporting from a company I was contracting for. Canada Revenue Agency sided with me, agreeing with my interpretation of how accounting should be done.

That's got to have cost a heck of a lot of time though, no? I've tried beancount myself - had to conclude it was not worth spending that many billable hours tinkering with the ledger.