GoDaddy is default registrar for Google Apps Domains (support.google.com)
Maybe Google can rethink their selection and make a change? It is strange to oppose SOPA on the one hand and use the services of one of its proponents at the same time. #justsayin
75 comments
[ 0.31 ms ] story [ 123 ms ] threadI hope everyone boycotts GoDaddy and transfers to another provider but we have to understand that something like this may not be feasible for some companies right now. Google may have a long term deal they have to finish out. In addition transferring the thousands of domains they have costs money for not just the transfers but they also have to get people to work on it and provide customer support as there will be many people who will need to know why this is happening and how they'll be affected.
GoDaddy has sucked even before they came out in support of SOPA, there's no doubt about that and the transfer/boycott movement is justified but let's please not put the entire focus on GD and remember the situations some companies are in can make it harder to transfer their domains. Also, using GoDaddy != support for SOPA just as using a gas powered car doesn't automatically make you a global warming denier. Circumstances just don't always allow for people to be idealists.
It's easy to say Google should stop doing business with them when we're talking about an issue that rouses such passionate opinions but we have to think about a few things first:
First, who are we to know what's best for Google? If we're so smart why aren't we all running billion dollar companies? Secondly, if companies went about changing their businesses just to suit a noisy minority there'd be problems. As it stands it seems like the people making the biggest deal about this is our small developer community. Granted there are a lot of powerful people on our side but when you take the big picture into account we're just a noisy minority.
So yeah, I would like them to distance themselves from GoDaddy like everyone else but should they? I also don't think leverage has any part in this. Google is already a registrar but there must be some good reason they use those 3rd parties. I don't think people are giving them enough credit here. They're looking at this one small detail of how Google does business and making broad, sweeping judgements.
(Disclosure: I used to work for Google. I don't now so I have no reason to sing their praise, but Google have always been a few notches above the competition when it comes to trying hard to do the ethical thing)
"mattcutts @benhuh I think we use eNom too. But safe to assume people has passed this feedback on."
http://twitter.com/#!/mattcutts/status/149988873726984192
Larry Page is trying to focus the company, not make it do everything under the sun.
See: Almost every extraneous service being cut.
[Update - Yep still on the list http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/accredited-list.html]
There was speculation at the time it was done to get hold of domain registration data, which could be used by search algorithms.
http://www.techspot.com/news/46481-judge-oks-private-domain-...
Big companies can't maneuver well. An elephant can't do acrobatics. They know they can't compete head-to-head with smaller companies.
So big companies start to create artificial barriers to entry. They form partnerships (i.e. Google), they begin to advertise heavily (i.e. Superbowl), and they start to lobby the government (i.e. SOPA). All of these actions are there to create lasting relationships that will help a large company like GoDaddy compete with smaller, more maneuverable firms.
GoDaddy couldn't give a damn about SOPA. They simply want to have a solid relationship with various members of congress, the senate, and parts of the executive branch. I'll scratch your back, you scratch mine down the road.
Also, although I don't believe this is a significant motivating factor, SOPA would reduce legal costs for GoDaddy. Currently, if there's a court order for a seizure or something along those lines, it has to go through a process in legal. One of the features of SOPA, is that it would take the process out of the courts, at least initially. No courts = no court orders to process.
Congressmen live and die by response to constituent concerns. If the folks get worked up about cyber-bullying or unsafe skateboard videos or kitten porn or whatever depredations those Internet freaks invent next, Congressmen want some avenue to Do Something. GoDaddy may get little from SOPA, but they could get a lot offering to help manage all of this . . .
New domains I get through name.com and they offer you the option to set up Google Apps for your domain.
It's essentially become useless for people interested in intelligent hacker/startup topics.
If you want a good community, whatever you do, don't have an open policy on membership and equal votes to everyone. That's a recipe to decline to idiocy pretty quickly.
RIP HN. Sad to see you go.
Edit: Really? Are we just on a downvoting spree today? That button isn't there to silence opinions you don't like and I'm getting really sick of seeing that happen around here. There are trolls and off topic comments that are safe to push down and ignore but there's people who don't have the same thoughts as you which are a different story. This really is becoming a big circle jerk/pat-each-other-on-the-back-for-being-so-smart club.
> 140
Not sure if that was meant to be ironic...
First hit for "seclists godaddy" on Google for me...
Where a company, like MySpace, deems that one page on a large well respected website, like seclists.org, aggravates them -- they can just dns block it and it is no longer accessible.
Holy..
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111129/20471916928/court-...
As for your argument about censoring the censors, it's daft.
Are you sure about that?
Sure there are.
http://www.godaddy.com/newscenter/release-view.aspx?news_ite...
Just as free as the people who think they should lose business for it, in shifting to a more social responsible company.
They are trying to enact broken and biased laws. Why shouldn't they go out of business?
No, they aren't the issue, but it's not like it takes energy or money away from fighting SOPA. And it adds ammunition to the anti-SOPA camp by establishing the instantaneous and painful consequences of speaking out against the 99%.
I've been seeing a list of companies that support SOPA posted on Facebook lately, but I think a list of reps would be a lot more useful.
Another key thing is that this is a bill being pushed through with corporate support. We're not going the change the minds of Big Media, but we can -- and have -- change the minds of companies that are supporting it for reasons periphery to their core businesses.