Sorry. I realized this would just get flaged and then dang would admonish me.
I do not see the value in this post. In particular, it basically says that Musk fired Baker because ... his scurrilous past means he shouldn't be vetting documents? I must be missing something obvious here because it looks like Musk is just being petulant.
Where does it say he suppressed information? Elon only says he had a “possible role in suppression”. They do say he vetted the information before it was public. For Twitter's sake I hope a lawyer did vet it!
4 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 25.1 ms ] threadSorry. I realized this would just get flaged and then dang would admonish me.
I do not see the value in this post. In particular, it basically says that Musk fired Baker because ... his scurrilous past means he shouldn't be vetting documents? I must be missing something obvious here because it looks like Musk is just being petulant.
Same guy that blocked the hunter biden laptop in 2020 & lawyer behind the debunked Steele Dossier.
You don't see an issue with this corrupt ex-FBI lawyer?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11509621/Elon-fires...