5 comments

[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 23.5 ms ] thread
3 days a week seems like a good compromise. I'd rather do 2 days one week and 3 days the following. So 5 days every 2 weeks but must be spread out over the 2 weeks. So not 1 week on / 1 week off.

My commute is epic (2hr - 2.5hr) it's by choice due to a lot of other personal factors. I enjoy the downtime during the commute, but I also enjoy not to have to wake up so early to get to the office daily during the WFH era.

Strangely the 5 hours / day that I get back is not that effective ha! I'm not reading as much books as I used to and actually spend more time lazing around the house.

What a conundrum. In that 5 hours daily commute I used to read lots, self study lots (reading tech books, Udemy courses etc). Now I just lazing around more.

Sometimes I feel like I need that 5 hours commute to force me to do my study.

I find myself much more productive at home than in an office. Between long commutes and deliberately noisy offices, I can get so much more done at home.
I don’t get this line of reasoning:

> office space they intend to make use of

That office space is sunk cost for those companies, or isn’t it? What would “making use of” that space actually accomplish?

(comment deleted)
I like the 3 day / 2 day. I'd also like to see fully remote offered as an option to people who've been in the same role/team for 5 years. At that point, you have enough time in the role/on the team and in the company that you can carry the culture with you and leverage those relationships to be just as effective at home unlike someone brand new to a company/role/team.