Don't Use Stripe

350 points by alienfemale ↗ HN
I used Stripe for about 2 years to run a fashion brand in the uk. In the case of my business, I never had an issue processing my small payments for dresses, ranging from a couple hundred dollars up to $1000. All of a sudden, we start getting attention we get payments of $3300 and more. We had around 50000$ dollars on stripe. Stripe flagged the account and is now holding the money from me for "at least 120 days"

It is one thing to say this is a red flag, fine... I hear you... no problem. a transaction multiple times the size... sure. I get it. However, A normal payment processor would then query you for documents authorizing the charge, bank statements, financial statements, some sort of procedure to remedy the issue. Stripe provides NO SUCH METHOD TO RESOLVE these issues.

There are reports of Stripe continuing to add "30 days" to the reserve hold past the initial 120 days, indefinitely. Stripe is taking advantage of a lack of regulation in this space to steal small merchant's large transactions. They see a big, outlier transaction and lick their chops, hiding behind KYC and "Fraud prevention" To hold your money indefinitely.

You cannot call Stripe. They do not have a phone number. Their support page on their website has Phone call and messaging grayed out. You can only email. If you email, you get robots. Even in the same email thread, a different "agent" (with a different name and everything) answers each time with not prior knowledge of your history. There are no ticket numbers to your support request; nothing tracking it. The robots respond with what is quite obviously a template response.

If you do a little bit of research about this topic, you immediately see this is a prevailing issue. Reports of Stripe taking up to $31,000 are all over the internet! Again, Stripe gives no manner to remedy this. There is NO ONE you can call. NO ONE you can talk to. More disconcerting, it seems that anyone who posts about this issue on reddit gets downvoted and teamed up against by established Reddit accounts, that I have to imagine are owned by Stripe. These account have some established reddit history on them, mainly talking about coding in PERL. It's a little sus.

In my case, I sent my EIN letter, Sales Tax Receipt, Articles of Org, Statement of Trade Name, Certificate of Good Standing, Bank Statements, Website links, Signed transaction receipts, and anything I could think of to Stripe to review. I just received robot-responses.

I challenge anyone here to connect me to a human being at Stripe that can tell me how to resolve the issue. It can't be done. This is a big problem and should be brought to the attention of small business owners, and regulators!

TL;DR: Stripe is a faceless enterprise with no humans you can talk to, no publicly listed phone number, and will allow your small account to operate just fine for a while. As soon as they see that you are growing (and thus your chances of leaving Stripe for a larger, more favorable processor) they will Freeze your account, disallow you to issue refunds, and hold your money indefinitely. You've been warned!!!

143 comments

[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 204 ms ] thread
I mean, come on, you've all been through this already, how could you fall for a reissue of PayPal?

I assumed that support and transparency were selling points of Stripe. If not, why bother? Just go with a good old local bank.

uhm, I assumed the ease or start and use were the the selling points
Collect it all and go to court. I can't see how they have a chance. Document losses their incompetence caused you and request these too.

IANAL ofc...

Yes, it's CLEAR you are not a lawyer.

They consented when they signed up. Read the terms. They have NO liability.

Are you a lawyer? Did you ever talk to one about an issue you had? You'd be amazed how much wiggle room for action a good lawyer can find on an issue that seems cut and dry at first.
That does not absolve them from abiding to applicable law.
“I consent that Stripe can hold my money for ever and ever without recourse or any way to connect with them. Every once in a while an account may simply be taken over as sacrifice to the gods and it may very well be my account”
I'm not a lawyer of course, but I don't think it's as simple as saying you signed it. You could give up your right to any form of holidays or accept to offer your first born in case of default on a contract but those clauses would be unenforceable when presented to a judge.
What exactly do you think a signature on a contract means?

It's a serious question. In you layman's view, what do you THINK signing something means?

Not every contract term is enforceable. And every contract has an implied obligation of good faith and fair dealing.

I’m not saying this is a sure winner: I don’t know the case law well enough to have an opinion. But I don’t think it’s capitalization-level obvious. And really the goal would be to get the attention of a human at Stripe who can just fix it.

The fact something is in a contract doesn't make it legal or enforceable.
Yes. It DOES.

In fact there is case law that confirms that.

That's what consent IS.

You can find similar stories about literally all online payment processors, including Paypal, Stripe, & all the "legacy" ones too (like First Data). Is it possible this isn't some nefarious conspiracy to steal money, but rather a reality of dealing with payments online given the regulatory environment it operates in?

Also this is the biggest season for sales and tech companies in general are dealing with navigating an extremely volatile macro economic environment - companies are planning for doing more with less staff and Q4 is likely pushing the limits for the customer support of many companies.

It is frustrating having your money on hold and there is a meaningful business impact that can have, but if you have tens of thousands of dollars tied up in Stripe (or any other payment processor), may I suggest expanding your other credit facilities such as lines of credit and loans, to allow you to navigate these sorts of situations, especially during Q4.

Pretty sure those other processors at least have phone numbers you can call.
PayPal does. And they have indeed helped me when my account was frozen.
(comment deleted)
But does anybody actually answer? In my experience a large number of companies with numbers just put you in a waiting queue that never ends. Might as well have some system to request a call, which is exactly what Stripe does.
So does Stripe. I've talked to Stripe humans over the phone for multiple accounts probably dozens of times.

Sometimes even, I send an email and they respond by phone.

> may I suggest expanding your other credit facilities such as lines of credit and loans, to allow you to navigate these sorts of situations, especially during Q4.

The story state of credit card payments forces this solution. Card payments are not your money, it's a statement of intention that someone wants to receive your product, try it out, and then pay for it only when they have found it completely satisfactory.

Your processor cannot simply launder that to hard cash and be on the hook when a large wave of chargebacks comes crushing in.

Surely there should be a way to do consumer protection better and more granular, with an actual dispute resolution system.

Fine, but can you forward the interest payments to Stripe? No?
Not sure what you mean with "You can find"? I'm not the one making the claims?

> reality of dealing with payments online given the regulatory environment it operates in?

In my book not having a phone number and not attempting to answer and resolve the issue isn't "dealing with it". That would be not dealing with something.

I was curious and looked at some.

2C2P 02-026-3000

Adyen - no phone

Alipay +65 68307260

Amazon Pay - no phone

Apple Pay - no phone

Atos +33 1 73 26 00 00

Authorize.Net 1-888-323-4289

BHIM 1800-120-1740

BitPay 1-404-907-2055

bKash 16247

BPAY +61 130 036 8098

https://pastebin.com/Kmb6Ju1K

I couldn't think of an automated way of obtaining the numbers. Maybe someone else (you lol) has some idea or is willing to do a few lines of data entry.

Most of those are sales numbers not support.
I think at least some of them but to say "most" one would have to do the work.

How many calls before the sales department would take legal action against me? Would they talk with support first?

Oh, here we go again. The hazy macro-economic environment strains the capital efficiency of tech as they learn-anew why traditional businesses aren't quite as efficient as they are. The world is complex, and hard to navigate, and hard to encode into the sterility of a computer program, and jeeze I guess things like customer support and humans and special edge cases may actually matter when it comes to building a sustainable business.

You don't keep legitimate customers by subjecting them to erroneous fraud mitigation. That's the end of the story. Stripe can figure it out, or they can die. "Stripe cuts 14% of its workforce, CEO says they ‘overhired for the world we’re in’" Stripe handled an estimated $350B in payments annually (as of 2020) with around 8,000 employees. JP Morgan Chase handles somewhere around $2T, with around 250,000 employees. They didn't overhire. They never had enough people in the first place. They certainly don't now. It's going to get worse, and it may not get better.

Stripe is a low interest rate environment corporation, with $2.3B in venture funding, which will not exist in 10 years. You give a great piece of advice: diversity your payment processing.

>"... diversify your payment processing."?<
What's the name of the fashion brand? I mean I'm no Stripe fan either, but how we supposed to know your not actually running a money laundering op? Or a Stripe negative advertising campaign ... or whatever. There is zero verifiable in your post.
Just curious, is there a real alternative that:

1. Has customer service

2. Doesn’t charge high fees

I feel like those two things are mutually exclusive, the high fees can be thought of as an insurance policy to ensure good cs. The lower fee options are like those fly by night insurance companies.

Everyone wants a fantastic experience without paying for it, turns out cs is very expensive, and even if stripe offered a paid support option, then we’d have people here complaining about being forced to pay to get their money back… no you took a discount service and now are being charged for premium.

1) I don't think the OP wants CS, they just want to get their damn money instead of having it held with no end in sight. Are there other contexts where someone can punt their obligations for 120 days (plus indefinite extensions) and not take heat about it?

2) On the back of my credit card there is an 800 number that I can call 24/7 and reach a human and get my problems sorted out. That's for my piddly 5 and 10 dollar transactions. For my checking account I can not only reach someone on the phone, I can go to a branch and sit across a desk from a bank officer in person, again with relatively piddly balances on account. OP has 10's of thousands on hold if the story is accurate: that seems to be deserving of at least as much attention.

3) I'm not a seller but on the buying side, it's also a huge hassle that I have to frequently jump through hoops and get some company's permission to spend my own money. The OP's story shows that the chokehold happens to sellers too. For me at least, bypassing that was a much bigger attraction of cryptocurrency than any of the cypherpunk weirdness was. (I never pursued it though). We need some kind of low-dollar payment product where the customer can choose to assume their own risk. I can understand if it doesn't extend to bigger transactions without qualifying the customer more extensively.

Obviously not easy - but how quickly do you think you can get on another payment processing platform? If you're desperate, is it possible to jump to Braintree or Square or Shopify or something in the immediate future?
Are there no real banks in USA provide API to process payments?
Several banks here in Switzerland offers an alternative. Some with a third party, some even using their own gateways.

Not sure about other countries, the only downside is they have setup fees and don't usually accept low volume.

Low volume is really what make PayPal and later Stripe so approachable.

yeah.

the service that got traction because paypal fucking sucks is now rapidly becoming just as bad

From the documentation side it still kicks paypals ass all over the floor.

Will definitely be collating the few stories of this I've seen though. We have a couple of large clients considering moving from PP to stripe, and while slow and somewhat useless, they could always talk to a human account manager at PP..

It’s sad that you regard your large clients as slow and useless ;)
why would you get Perl mixed into this rant? great programming lang
Have you consulted a lawyer?
> anyone who posts about this issue on reddit gets downvoted and teamed up against by established Reddit accounts, that I have to imagine are owned by Stripe.

You seem to be underestimating the power of fanboyism. If someone is a fanboy for a company/technology/whatever, they will defend it vehemently without even being paid for it.

> mainly talking about coding in PERL. It's a little sus.

But this now makes me want to ask you if you think those accounts are in the room with you right now.

It really depends on which subreddit you ask. I see plenty of support to people in these situations on r/entrepreneur and r/smallbusiness.

https://old.reddit.com/r/Entrepreneur+smallbusiness/search?q...

Developers may be biased towards Stripe because their API is among the best, and likely best-documented. (I had run into issues with the docs before, but was able to get to actual humans to resolve them. Eventually. Their first line support is just as bad as is described in any dilbertesque horror stories about outsourced support drones, giving you canned responses and having comprehension problems all the time.)

Now my theory is that Stripe will be a tad more inclined to help developers who help them build their empire via integrations and platforms and such, while actual merchants are a dime a dozen (in their eyes). I also have a perception that they have become way more MBA-aggressive in the recent years.

A large company I was working for transfered all money out from Paypal every night. I would never leave money with Paypal or Stripe.
It's a typical setup, PayPal even have the automated daily bank withdrawal for merchants. What you probably fail to mention or notice that the company transferred the money once they clear the mandatory hold window.

Exact width of the window may be adjusted case by case and depends on the stuff you sell — e.g. if it's digital goods with immediate delivery it may be shorter, if it's physical goods it may be certain amount of days after delivery verified by tracking number. In my case I was working for a company that provided proxy auction participation support, PayPal forced 30d non-negotiable hold on all our transactions.

So, you may transfer it every night, but it's safe to assume that 25-100% of your monthly revenue going through PayPal is sitting there at all times.

Even if you withdraw it, they can still come after you to get ‘their’ money back. PayPal (in the UK at least) requires a direct debit authorisation to be able to withdraw funds to a bank account. Part of that agreement is that they can also take money from your bank account if they decide to.

My experience with this is that I sold an iMac on eBay, then a week later PayPal informed me that the person who paid in fact has stolen someone else’s login, and so they sent a debt collection agency after me to make me refund the money, even though I no longer had the iMac.

Whatever the backstory of this particular incident is... It's clear that Stripe, Paypal, et al need to be regulated like a bank. Period.

If it looks like duck...

PayPal is a bank in the EU. Seems to work fine. Same needs to happen everywhere.
It's not. It is an electronic money institution, which is far from a bank, it can only keep customer funds and process payments.
I don’t know the difference, but it does say that on the tin: https://www.paypal.com/lu/webapps/mpp/about

> PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. et Cie, S.C.A. is a credit institution (or bank) authorised and supervised by Luxembourg’s financial regulator, the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (or CSSF). CSSF’s registered office: 283, route d’Arlon, L-1150 Luxembourg.

A bank can lend out deposits, ie. client money, ie. someone else's money. A normal regulated entity, like say an exchange, cannot.

Can't comment re PayPal specifically.

That is a very selective and borderline illegal description they are using. A bank is a credit institution, but now every ci is a bank.

Paypal and revolut are 100% not banks, they are financial institutions or emis, They can manage your money but not lend out anything and they have to hold the assets at 3rd party banks.

All global corporations need to be regulated. I heard a number of cases, when people could not reach FB support, they just ignore everyone. Did you know? It took Stripe 10 years to do it and 7 years for Robinhood. What do you think it is? 24×7 phone and chat support!
Facebook support has an interesting feature: you have to be logged in to access it, and if they have decided that your support request is ‘closed’ then in my experience the option to contact them again is disabled.
Why would Stripe need to be regulated "like a bank"? It's a payment processor.

It handles money. You're not supposed to keep money IN it, not for very long anyway. It's a path, not a destination.

Paypal is different. They are b2c and heavily advertise their wallet service. They have crypto and ways to earn interest off of it. They upsell insurance and credit cards.

How are they comparable?!

Considering you are posting this on HN, and you crated a new account to do this suggest you should have known about HN for quite some time.

The quickest way to get Stripe support is by posting on HN. You should have done that first.

I don't know what you can do except make noise here. I hope it works out.

>...we start getting attention we get payments of $3300 and more.

Thinking of others that may encounter this issue, I wonder if it's possible to spread orders between separate payment processors based on order $ value.

Processor #1: low average order value

Processor #2: high average order value

That way each processor handles orders within 1 standard deviation of the 30 day average (or however you might calculate it). I've never handled inventory for ecommerce. Just wondering.

If that's not possible, should ecommerce sites only ever have a min - max per unit value that isn't too large? e.g. $10 - $100 unit values, with avg $50 orders. Not $10 - $1000 unit values, with avg $50 orders.

I don’t see how those price bands would work for a fashion company. Charging more once you’ve been noticed is the whole business plan.
You're a business. Any reason why you didn't sue them?
Cost? It just happened and they’re still mourning for the loss?
A demand letter that will be processed by a human and probably resolve the issue is practically free.
Not defending Stripe here, but DO NOT HAVE A SINGLE POINT OF FAILURE! Have 2-3 payment processors hooked to a common abstraction layer, split transactions between them. If one fails, switch to others while you try to sort it out. Unfortunately, "computer says no" has become the harsh reality when dealing with any kind of corporate entities, so you need to be ready. It sucks, but that's the world we live in.
doesn't your common abstraction layer become your single point of failure in this situation? The only robust economical way to do that is too use a third party multiplatform abstraction service, especially given the complexity of maintaining functional billing across multiple payment processors, you're kinda screwed if you try to implement this in house for a small business (either losing revenue to bugs or losing money to in house implementation time/costs)
Not if it's an open source self-hosted abstraction layer, or built directly into the framework, like Laravel Cashier or Lago Billing.
Well, you can always fix your abstraction layer if it breaks. This is not true if you use a closed-source solution.

So, are there any open-source solutions available?

The abstraction layer has no vested interest in shutting you down for reasons related to your transaction flow, fraud, etc.
It's expensive to build 2-3 integrations for every service you rely on though. And losing 1/3 of your money can still be detrimental to your business.
Not necessarily: https://primer.io/
Isn't primer then the single point of failure?
I know nothing about the product, but I would be surprised if some federation service had the same financial liabilities (just offering software) as a payments processing company underwriting transactions.
Precisely. If it fails, it's possible to replace its integration by manually adding one or more of the payment processors directly; but it never holds your money itself, unlike PayPal or Stripe.
Losing 1/3 of your money is better than losing all of your money.
Yes indeed, every integration costs:

- kyc onboarding, getting and processing the docs and forms never goes smooth, can take 2 to 10 business days.

- integrating the gateway, 3k setup fee on average, plus dev cost for mapping the servers, doing the front end and the tests

- sometimes, due to being labeled a high risk sector industry, only trusted visa traffic, or an allocation thereof

And indeed, losing 30 percent would be the end, we operate with a 4 to 12 percent net margin, thanks goodness credit card payments are only 10 percent or so.

I am a total crypto sceptic, and the crypto psps are immature, but they are causing the least hassle.

I agree with this. Last week out of a sudden we had an increase in rejected payments from Stripe so we simply switched to Verifone for which we already had an integration. The switch is manual however so we're currently automating it.
We have 3 credit card processors and every freaking rule is always in their favor.

They have a downtime for visa, lasting 3 weeks? Nothing you can do, the gateway still charge you one quid per failed TX.

The worst was a single chargeback collapsed a MID and the processor refuses or claims they will not honor the settlement.Something like 20k usd for a months business.

All due to them miscoding and the chargeback exposing their miscoding practices.

Is there any recourse for this?

Any fintech news outlet where they can be named and shamed?

Don't use US American payment providers if you can avoid it.

It's a national sport over there to figure out new ways of getting people's money, whether it's peculiar made-up fees, or like in your case plain robbery under the ironical guise of crime prevention.

This sounds like theft. Maybe you should consider taking legal action.
(comment deleted)
The best option for you is to open case with EU competition commissionaire.
OP is in the UK, would they still be able to do this?
They are pretty responsive and I believe these things are happening in EU as well.