Ask HN: why is Johnson & Johnson listed as supporting SOPA?
I'm a regular customer of Johnson & Johnson products, so I emailed them about their support for SOPA.
To my suprise, they're denying any explicit support for the legislation:
http://cloud.github.com/downloads/duncan-bayne/duncan-bayne.github.com/Email%20Response.pdf
... and they don't appear on the official list of supporters here:
http://judiciary.house.gov/issues/issues_RogueWebsites.html
However, they do appear on this list:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmGJz_37ojoqdFZhYlBhN2hQOGRoN2R0ZGh3VDZlblE&pli=1#gid=0
... and many others like it.
Could someone familiar with this issue please explain the apparent discrepancy?
3 comments
[ 0.23 ms ] story [ 15.3 ms ] threadI don't know the specifics of SOPA support and J&J, but if it's not simply a "mistake" as darth_static postulates, it may be a matter of seeking to control physical counterfeiting. J&J has its hands in many things, these days; in fact, drugs may enter this topic, as well -- a focus of much counterfeiting effort. I believe many if not all of the pharmaceutical companies have been reported to be supporters of SOPA.