10 comments

[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 27.8 ms ] thread
Written by GPT?
Even GPT is aware that something that does not yet exist has no substance and is all hype.
Yes, that's been obvious from the beginning, and the rebranding as Meta. It is almost never wise to trust any company that rebrands itself. The only exception might be if GM rebranded itself as Government Motors.. Next question?
There was a time when people messed around with technology. You iterate, do some random stuff and you see what happens. Breaking even was great, but now if the nanosecond you spend on a project doesn't fart exponential revenue, everyone in the room mounts your back. The metaverse is nothing but a glorified store front... a bad one even :/
I feel like the “metaverse” will fare actually worse than 3D TVs did, which would be quite the accomplishment.
Once the development is completed, the virtual meeting experiences will be much more appealing than the current demos featuring cartoonish avatars without legs.

No one wants VR meetings. It just combines everything that sucks about Zoom meetings with everything that sucks about real meetings.

VR meetings are surprisingly good, actually.

I work at a VR startup, we have employees across the country. Once a week we meet in horizon workrooms, and it's usually pretty productive.

I wouldn't say it's more or less effective than a regular video call, but it does add a certain something to help feel connected with our remote employees.

That said, I fully recognize and admit that an office full of people talking to each other through VR headsets while sitting in the same room makes you look absolutely fucking insane. We had an HVAC technician during one of our VR meetings, and I'm a little embarrassed that he had to watch that.

I second this. I've done many company wide tests with VR meeting software (Arthur and Spatial) and everyone was impressed after trying it. Even the cartoony look didn't matter, though both products generate a nice avatar face from a picture. Horizons and its workspace wasn't even announced yet and it's still far behind these two.

People were sceptical but after actually trying always commented how much presence they felt compared to videomeeting and even dedicated conferencing rooms. It's most suited for the more interactive brainstorming workshop than the passive thing - incidentally also the most likely kind of meeting people tend to travel for at my work.

Pressure on alternatives to face to face meetings subsided after the pandemic. But as flying becomes more environmentally charged I think interest will pop up again.

This is the problem with VR IMO. Nobody can tell you how great the matrix is. You have to see it for yourself. That's the biggest barrier for entry, that red pill you have to take. There's not enough headsets around to introduce everyone.

Also, Google's project cardboard is a huge barrier to adoption. Many people think "I've already tried that VR thing and it was useless". I get this every day when I'm showing people VR. Yes, Cardboard was totally useless in terms of quality, capability and usability. But it's not even close to what a real 6DOF headset with handtracking is. It's like the difference between watching a 3D movie and experiencing something. If you've tried cardboard you have not tried VR.

Even simple things can really make the experience. One day we discovered that you can high-five each other in horizon workrooms, which immediately interrupted the meeting. We spent the next few minutes just high-fiving and laughing.

For our CEO's birthday, we all conspired to secretly change our avatars into a copy of his. It was kind of terrifying, but also hilarious.

Yes, one of the things that really captures the feeling for me is that when I take off the headset I often have this feeling of surprise, finding myself in my livingroom. It's really that immersive if you put aside the cartoony looks and just focus on collaboration. Especially if that involves company products because it's really easy to import 3D models of those into the various meeting software. It's really nice to hold a product in your hand while talking about it.

It's just so hard to explain this to people. They really have to try it. Also, it's not something you'd replace a night out with your friends with. Not at all. Meeting up in person is always much better. However when that's not an option or it's difficult due to international travel or other reasons, then I think it's much better than a videomeeting.