A particularly bad headline, as even if you accept the premise that humans had nothing to do with it, the climate does seem to be changing with some dramatic effects.

From this page[1] on the site:

> Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. In particular, scientists should emphasize that their modeling output is not the result of magic: computer models are human-made. What comes out is fully dependent on what theoreticians and programmers have put in: hypotheses, assumptions, relationships, parameterizations, stability constraints, etc. Unfortunately, in mainstream climate science most of this input is undeclared.

> To believe the outcome of a climate model is to believe what the model makers have put in. This is precisely the problem of today’s climate discussion to which climate models are central. Climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound self-critical science. We should free ourselves from the naïve belief in immature climate models. In future, climate research must give significantly more emphasis to empirical science.

[1]: https://clintel.org/world-climate-declaration/

The ascot on one guy and the dead eyes on the other… I’m not sure I’m buying it. I’ve considered the notion that there’s not a climate emergency but this just optically seems like billionaire greenwash