6 comments

[ 0.25 ms ] story [ 25.7 ms ] thread
What benefit have we seen?
Where is the paper?
Research on Highly Pathogenic H5N1 Influenza Virus: The Way Forward: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484390/

While searching for the above paper, I also came across this one: Research on enhanced transmissibility in H5N1 influenza: Should the moratorium end?

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121009093027.h...

> Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases contributes his voice as a representative of an organization that is a key funder of influenza research. Although Fauci acknowledges that the benefits of gain-of-function research outweigh the risks, he argues that scientists have yet to fully meet their responsibility for engaging the public in weighing these matters and making the case for proceeding. He outlines how the U.S. government plans to augment policy guidelines related to "dual use research of concern" like the experiments on enhanced influenza transmission.

Also, The Weekend Australian article: https://archive.ph/Ow7v2

Are we still pretending COVID-19 was unrelated to gain of function research or have they finally admitted that yet?
It's pretty much inconceivable to most people that Fauci committed gross malfeasance, but the evidence has only grown over time.

It's the sort of thing that would melt minds and violate the sense of reality for far too many people.